Make: Mitsubishi
Model: Lancer Evolution VII
Registration Number: PL006
Weight with driver: 3,450 lbs

Horse Power
Stock Horse Power = 280 bhp at 19 PSI
Past Power = 356 bhp at 20 PSI date 2007-04-03
Current Power(1) = 369 bhp at 20.3 PSI date 2007-11-24 - Evoscan and about 405.63 HP at the flywheel.

0 - 60 = 4.294 sec
1/4 mile = 12.977 sec @ 105.29 mph
Weight = 3220 lbs

Engine/Performance Modification
Cams - GSC Exhaust 272 duration 10.2
Cams - GSC Intake 272 duration 10.8
AEM Perfromance Air intake System
Front Mount Intercooler - Greddy Trust
Aluminum Intercooler Pipes
Header Manifold[/color]
O2 Housing - O Tomei EVO Expreme
Down Pipe 3’- O Tomei
Test pipe 3" - Mc Millan
Full Exhaust 3'- Greddy Trust
Catback Exhaust - GReddy Titanium Exhaust
Clutch - ACT HDSS 475 bhp
Clutch Line - Steel Braided
Boost Controller - Greedy Profec B-Spec II
Re-flashed ECU 20.5 psi– by http://www.ttp-engineering.com
Fuel Pump 550cc - Walbro
Blow off Valve Greedy Type S
Oil Catch Can
Spark Plugs - HKS

Exterior Modification
Vortex Generator
F1 Carbon Fiber Mirrors

Interior Modification
Turbo Timer - Greedy Full Auto Timer
Boost Gauge - Auto Meter
Boost Controller - Greedy Profec B-Spec II
Wide Band AFM/Data Logger - Zetronix http://www.zeitronix.com/
Evoscan - Full Data logger of the Ecu http://www.limitless.co.nz/evoscan/
Ecu Flash - for Ecu modification http://www.openecu.org/index.php?title=EcuFlash
G-Tec Pro RR

 

I can make 40 more whp in software dynos if I use no smoothing too.

 

Evoscan has always measured inaccurately after a gear shift for me. I think with a single gear pull it does alright though.

 

Not talking about that. Load a single gear pull, then plot it in the dyno. Then use 0 smoothing like the OP and watch your peak HP sky rocket.

 

Please advise the best way to log data to get the most accurate reading. The intention was to get feedback as to how realistic this program is, as there are no dyno's on my island.

0 smoothing????

Thanks for your advise in advance (Patat Mamaw).

 

EvoScan's estimates are useless in my opinion.

DataLogLab is a much more reliable tool, and even then, you must use some degree of smoothing... typically 4-6 ticks is common, but it all depends on how fast you are logging. The faster you log, the more smoothing you will need.

Robert, the graph should be a smooth curve, not a jagged spikey mess. Those spikes are not your actual horsepower.

 

I agree. From the logs I've taken of Trinidadian evos (VIIs,VIIIs and IXs) evoscans road dyno is bogus.

What octane do u get in DR and what's your 1/4 time and trap speed? If I had to take a wild guess - I'd put you closer to the 330-350 range.

 

I've had the evoscan's #'s be accurate to within 5whp compared my own and other friends dynojet readings. The #'s are about as irrelevant as real dyno numbers. You just need a setup that is consistent with itself so you can make A-B comparisons to see if you are increasing or decreasing performance.

 

Anyone care to elaborate on why after a gear shift Evoscan reads a high "dyno" number?

 

Not DR but DOM, closer to TNT.

Octane 95, i was told

12.9 but that was smoking the tires. I will do another one soon, but I have to change the suspension bushings.
0 - 60 = 4.294 sec
1/4 mile = 12.977 sec @ 105.29 mph
Weight = 3220 lbs +driver 225lb

 

That weight/hp/trap is only about 300whp worth of power.

How do you get 0-60? Are you using a g-tech or are we talking a REAL track?

 

Nice numbers for stock turbo

 

I used the new Gtec pro RR.

 

then those numbers must be right if its new and RR