Notices
ECU Flash

LC-1 vs. Stock O2 readings..

Old May 14, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #1  
tkklemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
LC-1 vs. Stock O2 readings..

Hey all,

In some recent data logs,

The lambda values aren't correlating to the AFR values.. This is on E85..

I have been tuning off my LC-1, not the stock O2.. Am I looking at this right?

My AFR's off the LC-1 are 11.76 - 11.65

The Stock O2 is reading 0.89792...

Which one is right?

My understanding is 0.89792 is 13.199 AFR....

Last edited by tkklemann; May 14, 2008 at 07:20 PM.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 07:23 PM
  #2  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
narrowband means nothing. I've seen .91/.89/.95 for 10.5afr to 12 afr and everything in between.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 07:25 PM
  #3  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
+1

your LC1 is several order of magnitudes more accurate than a NB..

/when it works :P
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #4  
tkklemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
I am knocking like crazy with only 27psi and the car is trying to run 0* at 3500 rpm.. FWIW, the Load is 300..

Knock counts wer 9, and the timing was -4* from the ECU pulling timing.. The pull made my octane level 96.86.. Argh..

I was doing better with 93 than this, which is why I am wondering if my wideband is off....

I am thinking of recalibrating, even though I did this recently, and changing the LC-1 calibration to Ethanol..

I don't have Winzip on this watered down logging/flashing laptop, so I will post the actual log tomorrow...

So far, I'm not really seeing the real benefits of E85...
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #5  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
you need a lot more alcohol than gas to get the same result. I don't have it on the top of my head but stoich for alcohol is in the single digits isn't it.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #6  
merkzu's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 392
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
I would leave the WB on gasoline mode since thats what everyone here uses. Need a log to really help any.. FWIW I run 1* of timing at 3500rpm with E85 on the stock turbo at 28psi, and I ran 0* for a long time before that
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 04:04 AM
  #7  
tkklemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Here is the Datalog that I am speaking of..

Some data has been removed, it was irrelevant...
Attached Files
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:22 AM
  #8  
JoeBee's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Narrowband Sensors can only operate at Stoich. It's Voltage jump around this stoich point from 1Volt to 0V (ideal). So the only think you know is: A Voltage near 1V means richer than 14.7 (or better: richer than lambda 1) and a Voltage nearer 0V means leaner than 14.7.

Thats why we all buy the wideband lambda Sensors.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #9  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Complete list of mods?

I have to wonder if its phantom knock too like a downpipe banging around or something. You could always turn the boost way down to figure that one out though.

Edit:

After reviewing the log the thing that is the most interesting to me is after he stops the pull the TPS immediately snaps close but the AFR remains around the same even though the injector pulse width drops to near zero. I would think that would push the AFR to 21 very quickly but it appears to not do anything..

Could that mean what we are seeing is a missfire?

Last edited by RoadSpike; May 15, 2008 at 10:05 AM.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #10  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
You'll be much more successful tuning in lambda on your wideband instead of an AFR which is lying to you because you have it set for gasoline and your actually running 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. Also you can run MUCH richer on ethanol based fuels than gasolene and still make power. Ethanol IS a coolant whereas gasoline is a poor coolant. FYI high 11's is probably too lean on good E85.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #11  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
I agree lamba would be more of an effective tuning tool for getting the AFR right.

Here's a chart i pulled from the web.
Code:
Fuel                      AFRst     FARst     Equivalence   Lambda
----                      -----     -----       Ratio       -----
=======================--====================================

Gasoline   stoich          14.7    0.068       1           1
Gasoline Max power rich    12.5    0.08        1.176       0.8503
Gasoline Max power lean    13.23   0.0755      1.111       0.900

=======================--====================================

E85 stoich                 9.765    0.01235    1          1
E85 Max power rich         6.975    0.1434     1.40       0.7143
E85 Max power lean         8.4687   0.118      1.153      0.8673


=======================--====================================

E100 stoich                9.0      0.111      1          1
E100 Max power rich        6.429    0.155      1.4        0.714
E100 Max power lean        7.8      0.128      1.15       0.870


=======================--====================================
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #12  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Mid to high 11's on an wideband set for 1.0 lambda=14.7 AFR is pretty average for most users and would equate to .78 to .81 lambda for E85.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 03:19 AM
  #13  
tkklemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
Mid to high 11's on an wideband set for 1.0 lambda=14.7 AFR is pretty average for most users and would equate to .78 to .81 lambda for E85.

That's where the "problem" (If it is a problem) I am seeing is, that the wideband is showing high 11's but the lambda radings out of my primary O2 are reading like the car is in the low 13's. I am not sure which one to believe..

I think I am going to change the LC-1 calibration to Ethanol, and see if it better correlates. I am wondering if my primary O2 is on its way out.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 03:56 AM
  #14  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by tkklemann
That's where the "problem" (If it is a problem) I am seeing is, that the wideband is showing high 11's but the lambda radings out of my primary O2 are reading like the car is in the low 13's. I am not sure which one to believe..

I think I am going to change the LC-1 calibration to Ethanol, and see if it better correlates. I am wondering if my primary O2 is on its way out.
At WOT? Man, never...ever...trust the narrowband O2 sensor readings for any tuning (as this ENTIRE thread is full of people telling you this). Like mentioned earlier, the narrowband sensor is basically an on/off switching sensor. Its either above .45 volts or its below .45 volts. Thats it and thats all the ECU is looking for. One day my front O2 sensor will read .88v at 11.2AFR (on my wideband) and another day it'll read .81 at the same AFR.

There shouldn't be ANY question that you should even remotely trust the front O2 sensor over a wideband for tuning ever.

Also, don't forget that a "lambda" narrowband sensor reads the lambda for the fuel being used. When you use gas, the front O2 will switch at 14.7 but with E85 lambda is 9.7AFR. The sensor only looks for a stoich burn of whatever fuel its seeing being burned. It doesn't look for "14.7:1", just 1.0 lambda. People forget that.

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; May 16, 2008 at 04:01 AM.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 04:52 AM
  #15  
JoeBee's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Germany
@Jack
This is exactly what I mean in my post earlier, but you find the right words.
The Sensor Voltage at the right and left of the stoich point is very unstable. Temperatur for example have a huge impact on this voltage and many other parameters also.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 AM.