ecuflash guru'sand anyone else (fuel trims)

Subscribe
May 19, 2008 | 06:05 AM
  #16  
If your MAF sensor under-reads because of (some) induction kits, that would explain the lower than expected injector size in the ECU compared with the real size.
Reply 0
May 19, 2008 | 06:09 AM
  #17  
Well, I have the Buschur air filter (no hardpipe). I suppose there are minor changes to the maf reading. My scaling right now for the inectors are 886.
Reply 0
May 19, 2008 | 06:16 AM
  #18  
Doesn't sound bad, JDM and US vary as well, but with a cone filter I'm commonly setting it a good 10% below the real injector size without adjusting the MAF scalings.
Reply 0
May 19, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #19  
Quote: If your MAF sensor under-reads because of (some) induction kits, that would explain the lower than expected injector size in the ECU compared with the real size.
Yep. I used my scaling and latency on 3 cars so far with cone filters with good success. RedLanEvo, sorry my values didn't work for you.
Reply 0
May 23, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #20  
FIXED! Cruise = 0% Idle =3%
Reply 0
May 24, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #21  
Quote: FIXED! Cruise = 0% Idle =3%
What did you change in order to fix your problem.

I am having issues with fuel trims / latency.
Reply 0
Subscribe