So after my build wknd with Smikeevo:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-smikeevo.html

...I was learning a bit about in hopes of fine tuning the tune myself:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...-ecuflash.html

In the second video it talks about logging 2-byte load so I figured I'd set it up myself. Once I completed that he goes on to mention other features being added to an owner's XML file, adding different things to log better b4 u tune, so I wondered if Smikeevo had added anything to my 88590015.XML when he tuned it.

I had ECUFLASH version 1.41.2483 installed when Smikeevo tuned it, so I installed the same thing, but in a different directory. So now I have two of the exact same ECUFLASHs installed.

I compared the two copies of 88590015.XML with this free software that shows me the differences:

http://3d2f.com/download/17-990-free...download.shtml

And it looks like there are differences between the files. Not just where I added 2-byte load at the bottom, but some commenting is different as well as a table or two.

I asked Smikeevo and he stated he only changed the map, and didn't touch the XML file. Just trying to figure out why there are differences in the 88590015.XML on the same version of ECUFLASH installed twice on my PC. Any ideas?

(I've attached the two files to this post as TXT files)

Thanks,

Bryce

 

The new XML file has comments breaking up each section of the code, just like there are sections in the ecuflash program breaking up the different sections like ROM info, MISC, Fuel, Fuel Lean Spool etc.

There is also this comment:
But there is no "88590015_mods.XML" in my ROMmetadata folder in the new install and that include statement is commented out, as if this is a feature coming in a newer version of ECUFlash. Could it be, the author of ECUFlash changed the XML file in preparation for new features in a future release of ECUFlash, but didn't increment the versioning, because the new features were commented out?