EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices

Requested Torque/Throttle Ramp Rate Tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2011 | 07:59 PM
Share
  #16  
tephra's Avatar
tephra
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I added in a few more defs.

I also renamed them to "Requested Torque Ramp Rate" as that is more accurate and put them into the Torque category.
Reply
0
Old Oct 16, 2011 | 07:01 AM
Share
  #17  
itzwolf's Avatar
itzwolf
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Any love for 2011 USDM? I'm interested in ROM 56890010.
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 07:31 AM
Share
  #18  
murlo26's Avatar
murlo26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Interesting. I might try this out eventually.
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 09:30 AM
Share
  #19  
fostytou's Avatar
fostytou
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Nice work as always!
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 10:06 AM
Share
  #20  
RazorLab's Avatar
RazorLab
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
A note:

These have much more impact (side effects) on the SST cars then on the 5MT.

Just know this when messing with them.
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 10:50 AM
Share
  #21  
linkbeat's Avatar
linkbeat
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Originally Posted by itzwolf
Any love for 2011 USDM? I'm interested in ROM 56890010.
Ditto that. I had this done on my old STi to help with daily driving through Engine Load Compensation tables IIRC. Would also love to do this on my 2011.
Last edited by linkbeat; Oct 17, 2011 at 11:25 AM.
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 11:41 AM
Share
  #22  
RazorLab's Avatar
RazorLab
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Just in case people didn't know the RPM/MPH breakouts:


Evo X GSR
* 1st gear = 175 rpm/mph
* 2nd gear = 119.3 rpm/mph
* 3rd gear = 88.4 rpm/mph
* 4th gear = 67 rpm/mph
* 5th gear = 46.5 rpm/mph

Evo X MR
* 1st gear = 194.3
* 2nd gear = 125.9
* 3rd gear = 93.2
* 4th gear = 70.3
* 5th gear = 53.6
* 6th gear = 41.2
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 05:43 PM
Share
  #23  
tephra's Avatar
tephra
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by razorlab
A note:

These have much more impact (side effects) on the SST cars then on the 5MT.

Just know this when messing with them.
Care to elaborate?
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 06:36 PM
Share
  #24  
RazorLab's Avatar
RazorLab
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by tephra
Care to elaborate?
Changes up/downshift characteristics in Auto, etc.

Same with changing requested torque tables.
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 06:37 PM
Share
  #25  
tephra's Avatar
tephra
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
as in more aggresive shifts (ie clunkier)?
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 06:44 PM
Share
  #26  
RazorLab's Avatar
RazorLab
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by tephra
as in more aggresive shifts (ie clunkier)?
More aggressive (or less) up/downshifts. Will "kick-down" much faster (or slower) and at different RPM in Auto. Engine braking changes (clutches take longer or slower to release), etc etc

I've told you a lot of this already David.

Seems like almost all of the torque related tables tweak these things in some way. Probably indirectly.

That 1D table we last talked about in Email (Adjust Offset 2D) for sure changes it. Really bad downshifts (bad rev matching/gearbox meshing) into lower gears with it maxed out.
Last edited by razorlab; Oct 17, 2011 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
0
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 09:59 PM
Share
  #27  
Bernhard's Avatar
Bernhard
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Germany
I drive with changed ramp rate maps since about 2 months now and I am quite sure that the cruise control behaves different than before.
Can anyone confirm this?
Reply
0
Old Oct 18, 2011 | 12:52 AM
Share
  #28  
RS200Z's Avatar
RS200Z
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
I think the VehicleSpeed address for 2011 EDM should be 62cea instead of 62ce8.
Reply
0
Old Oct 18, 2011 | 01:23 AM
Share
  #29  
RS200Z's Avatar
RS200Z
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Originally Posted by itzwolf
Any love for 2011 USDM? I'm interested in ROM 56890010.
If you are using Golden's definition, you can add the following into 56890009.XML as 56890010 inherit from that. Otherwise replace the scaling="Percent255" with just "Percent" as per Tephra's post #1.


Code:
  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - SST Normal Mode" category="Torque" address="5f853" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
  <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>

  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - SST SPORT Mode" category="Torque" address="5f81b" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
    <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>

  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - SST S-SPORT Mode" category="Torque" address="5f7e3" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
    <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>

  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - 5MT" category="Torque" address="5f7ab" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
    <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>
Last edited by RS200Z; Oct 18, 2011 at 01:32 AM.
Reply
0
Old Oct 18, 2011 | 06:59 AM
Share
  #30  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Jumperalex
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
Originally Posted by razorlab
More aggressive (or less) up/downshifts. Will "kick-down" much faster (or slower) and at different RPM in Auto. Engine braking changes (clutches take longer or slower to release), etc etc

I've told you a lot of this already David.

Seems like almost all of the torque related tables tweak these things in some way. Probably indirectly.

That 1D table we last talked about in Email (Adjust Offset 2D) for sure changes it. Really bad downshifts (bad rev matching/gearbox meshing) into lower gears with it maxed out.
So are you saying somewhere there is a way to change the behavior, predictably, of Auto-Normal? Because OMG I could love to tweak that to be a bit more agressive. I'd also like to tweak Auto-Sport to be a tad less agressive. They are just to ofar apart to be useful.

Of course I just default to manual-Sport as a result which is what I should be doing anyway
Reply
0



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 PM.