What is the limit of stock Evo IX MAF ?
Thank you!
that is, I just install a GTX3582 ETS kit with stock MAF intake , and tune it all as usual, without any manipulation and calibration on ecu?
In Russia maximum result on stock ecu with MAF si 550hp, and our tuners believe thats more is unreal !!
that is, I just install a GTX3582 ETS kit with stock MAF intake , and tune it all as usual, without any manipulation and calibration on ecu?
In Russia maximum result on stock ecu with MAF si 550hp, and our tuners believe thats more is unreal !!
Trending Topics
there are ipw and load limits that must be eliminated past a certain point on the maf also. other then that, i would also recommend you remove the maf screen as well, so the turbo can not suck it in.
That I´ll like to know! Next project is a T3 turbo kit with 6266 or 6466 i don´t know yet, but I want to know if always tune with stock maf or Speed Density... How much hp´s you can get with SD with big turbos capare to stock MAF?
over 30whp~ with a 6266 with a full 4" intake pipe & filter.
hey thanx Tom!!!
I think I will choose 6262 CEA Bb for my car with SD... I will buy the MAP T3 kit.. I hope to get good results!
And OP.. I think MAF is ok fot those stock fram turbos until FP Black, but with larges turbo is better SD.
Hello,on the car KameloT have set turbo kit GTX35, EUR ECU transferred to TephraMOD 88582714 v-7 SD, recording the first log showed a mismatch of actual load with load in the log. The actual angle of ignition does not coincide with the desired approximately 100 load, such as a corner on a load of 100 corresponds approximately to the corner of the 200 load in the log. Why such a discrepancy? Sorry for my language
Hello,on the car KameloT have set turbo kit GTX35, EUR ECU transferred to TephraMOD 88582714 v-7 SD, recording the first log showed a mismatch of actual load with load in the log. The actual angle of ignition does not coincide with the desired approximately 100 load, such as a corner on a load of 100 corresponds approximately to the corner of the 200 load in the log. Why such a discrepancy? Sorry for my language



