EcuFlash 1.44 and Mode 23 DoMode Table
EcuFlash 1.44 and Mode 23 DoMode Table
There is an Error in the definition files that came with EcuFlash 1.44. They do give credit to me for the definitions (goldenevo.com), but they changed them slightly to use the better bloblist style. That way you don't have to type in values.
In evo10base.xml
This:
Should be this:
The 00 byte is very important. The address points to two bytes. The first is always 0. So EcuFlash looks at the 0 byte and expects it to be 4D. It doesn't find 4D and says "No Match". This is a good thing, and it prevents you from bricking your ECU.
In evo10base.xml
This:
Code:
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x42 -> 0x52" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="42" />
<data name="enabled" value="52" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4B -> 0x5B" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="4B" />
<data name="enabled" value="5B" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4D -> 0x5D" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="4D" />
<data name="enabled" value="5D" />
</scaling>
Code:
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x42 -> 0x52" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="0042" />
<data name="enabled" value="0052" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4B -> 0x5B" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="004B" />
<data name="enabled" value="005B" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4D -> 0x5D" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="004D" />
<data name="enabled" value="005D" />
</scaling>
Fantastic. I haven't updated my ecuflash/evoscan in over a year, I was trying to do mode23 and got stuck..
Then I upgraded and saw it was added and thought sweet...but I didn't flash it. Glad I didn't. Still reading and learning.
Then I upgraded and saw it was added and thought sweet...but I didn't flash it. Glad I didn't. Still reading and learning.
Trending Topics
Evolved Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
I ditched all the definitions that came with 1.44 because they are formatted differently using inherit base, and I don't want to have to redo all my definitions. If you have a good xml already, you can use it instead of the one that came with the new version.
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
I think I might do that, I can't seam to get the RAX patch to show up and when they do all I can see is the RAX patch items (everything else disappears)
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: pa
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrfred
ECU Flash
496
Sep 14, 2022 07:08 PM