Notices
ECU Flash

2.3L, 10:1 CR Tuning Advice Needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2014 | 08:28 AM
  #16  
TurboTylerIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
making some progress. the butt dyno agrees with virtual dyno. but i did get 4 counts of knock at about 3k so that pulled some timing at peak boost. its probably phantom though right? everyone says e85 doesnt knock...




Last edited by TurboTylerIX; May 30, 2014 at 08:31 AM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 01:16 PM
  #17  
jeffbeagley's Avatar
Evolving Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 364
Likes: 3
From: Springfield, MO
Completely ignore knock on E85. You're still hitting really low timing for peak tq/load. Try and hit 2-3 in that area. Is it an 8 or 9 head?

When you quit gaining tq with timing then you know you've gone past mbt.

Last edited by jeffbeagley; May 30, 2014 at 01:19 PM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 01:28 PM
  #18  
TurboTylerIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Originally Posted by jeffbeagley
Completely ignore knock on E85. You're still hitting really low timing for peak tq/load. Try and hit 2-3 in that area. Is it an 8 or 9 head?

When you quit gaining tq with timing then you know you've gone past mbt.
ok cool thanks, its a IX head. are you sure about 2-3* at peak? I thought thats the same amount of timing that guys with 9:1 compression would run on a IX? would that not be too much for 10:1? I guess I'll see by watching MBT as I go...
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 04:22 PM
  #19  
ReaperX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 914
Likes: 2
From: Greenville, SC
Here's my advice you. Protect your investment with either of the options below.

Option 1: Put it on a dyno. You're going to be chasing your tail and always wondering if you rely on the vd for tuning e85

Option 2: If you can't rent a dyno, or don't want to, then give it a solid pump gas tune and work from that. Run the non ethanol timing from peak load to 5k, and then ramp up the timing to around 3* more than pump out the top. It'll help keep your investment safe and happy.

Also, I'd run 11.5afr around peak load/torque, and gradually lean it out up top.

One thing I haven't seen anyone ask is, what does your mivec map look like?
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 04:34 PM
  #20  
TurboTylerIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Originally Posted by ReaperX
Here's my advice you. Protect your investment with either of the options below.

Option 1: Put it on a dyno. You're going to be chasing your tail and always wondering if you rely on the vd for tuning e85

Option 2: If you can't rent a dyno, or don't want to, then give it a solid pump gas tune and work from that. Run the non ethanol timing from peak load to 5k, and then ramp up the timing to around 3* more than pump out the top. It'll help keep your investment safe and happy.

Also, I'd run 11.5afr around peak load/torque, and gradually lean it out up top.

One thing I haven't seen anyone ask is, what does your mivec map look like?
Your advice makes a lot of sense, thanks. I definitely don't want to hurt this motor, I can't afford to do it over again...

Whats the reasoning for 11.5 at peak load?

when you say 3* more than pump you probably mean 93 right? my pump here is CA 91. also, when you say 3* more than pump...well there is no way that I can run the same boost (30psi) that I am now... I could probably only run like 22psi on CA 91 with this 10:1 motor. so 3* more than pump at 22 psi?

My mivec is just the JDM RS basically.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 04:56 PM
  #21  
ReaperX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 914
Likes: 2
From: Greenville, SC
In my experience with E85, an 11.5afr at peak yields more torque than a leaner afr would.

Yes I was referring to 93, I keep forgetting about the lovely 91 you guys get in Cali.

I would do a pump tune for a flat 22psi to determine how much timing you can realistically run out the top (since 22psi is all you'll be able to hold on the stock turbo up top anyway). I would run 1* at peak load, and ramp smoothly to 5* by 5k. Since you're on 91, I'd set timing 4* higher than pump out the top, and interpolate from 5k to 7.5k.

Also, you may want to look at posts 731 - 733 in this thread: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...tuning-49.html
for some ideas on your mivec map. With S2's you'll want to take a look at some changes from the jdm rs map.

But.... the best thing to do is to really strap it to a dyno as VD is very difficult to get repeatable results when trying to find MBT on ethanol fuels.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 05:07 PM
  #22  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
On 2.0L with stock comp, on E85, stock turbo, cams... average timing would be 2-4* at 3500 and ramp it up slowly to 5500 and then 18-21 out the top. That's a couple degrees from MBT and average timing numbers for about 30+ Evo 9's I've tuned on E85 on a Mustang dyno.

If you want to send me some logs, I'd be happy to give some input. send me a PM if you wish.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 05:22 PM
  #23  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Here is a log from a 2.3L, E85, CBRD BBKB, Everything ported.

This car was happy with timing, this log was right about MBT and I dialed it back a degree or two after this.

This was also back before load clip was found. I'd say this was around 400 load at peak too. Boost @ 33-34psi peak

Code:
RPM	TimingAdv	WideBandAF	KnockSum	Load1B
3250	8	12.9	0	265.9375
3312.5	7	12.7	0	292.5
3468.75	6	12.6	0	318.125
3562.5	6	12.4	0	342.8125
3656.25	5	12.2	0	359.0625
3781.25	5	11.9	0	376.875
3906.25	5	11.6	0	379.6875
4125	6	11.8	0	379.6875
4281.25	6	12.1	0	379.6875
4406.25	6	12.2	0	379.6875
4562.5	7	12.1	0	379.6875
4718.75	8	11.8	0	379.6875
4812.5	9	11.8	0	379.6875
4937.5	10	11.8	0	379.0625
5062.5	10	11.8	0	379.6875
5250	10	11.5	1	379.6875
5375	11	11.5	1	379.6875
5500	13	11.6	0	379.375
5687.5	14	11.5	0	377.1875
5781.25	14	11.5	0	378.4375
5875	15	11.6	0	378.4375
6000	15	11.6	0	373.4375
6156.25	17	11.7	0	363.4375
6250	17	11.8	0	355.9375
6375	18	11.8	0	349.6875
6531.25	18	11.9	0	346.875
6625	18	11.9	0	344.375
6718.75	18	11.9	0	343.4375
6812.5	19	11.9	0	340
6937.5	19	12	0	336.875
7031.25	19	12	0	333.75
7093.75	19	12.1	0	331.25
7218.75	19	12	0	327.1875
7312.5	20	12	0	322.5
7375	20	12	0	320.3125
7437.5	20	12	0	316.25
7500	20	12	0	313.125
7625	20	12	0	308.75
7687.5	21	12.1	0	305.625
7781.25	21	12.2	0	301.25


Hope this helps
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 05:40 PM
  #24  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Here is a 2.4L 10:1 CR, E85, OG FPgreen, cossy cams, ported. This one is a little bit more average for timing and higher comp than the above example.

Code:
RPM	TimingAdv	JDMMAP	WideBandAF	KnockSum
2968.75	4	16.64867	12.8	0
3000	4	17.80949	12.7	0
3062.5	4	19.35725	12.7	0
3093.75	3	20.13113	12.6	0
3156.25	3	22.06583	12.6	0
3218.75	2	23.42012	12.6	0
3250	1	26.1287	12.6	0
3343.75	1	27.86993	12.5	0
3375	2	29.61116	12.5	0
3437.5	2	31.15892	12.4	0
3531.25	2	31.73933	12.3	0
3625	2	32.51321	12.3	0
3656.25	3	32.51321	12.4	0
3750	3	32.51321	12.3	0
3812.5	3	32.70668	12.3	0
3875	3	32.70668	12.2	0
3968.75	3	32.70668	12.2	0
4031.25	3	32.70668	12.2	0
4093.75	3	32.70668	12.3	0
4156.25	4	32.31974	12.3	0
4250	4	32.12627	12.2	0
4312.5	4	31.73933	12.1	0
4375	3	31.73933	12.1	1
4406.25	3	31.15892	12.1	1
4468.75	3	30.57851	12.2	1
4562.5	4	29.9981	12.2	1
4593.75	4	29.80463	12.2	1
4687.5	5	28.83728	12.2	1
4750	5	29.03075	12.2	1
4781.25	5	28.25687	12.2	0
4843.75	6	27.86993	12.2	0
4937.5	7	27.09605	12.2	0
4968.75	7	26.90258	12.2	0
5000	7	26.90258	12.2	0
5093.75	7	25.93523	12.2	0
5156.25	8	25.93523	12.1	0
5187.5	8	25.54829	12.2	0
5250	8	25.35482	12.1	0
5312.5	9	24.96788	12.1	0
5343.75	9	24.77441	12.1	0
5406.25	10	24.38747	12.1	0
5468.75	10	24.38747	12.1	0
5500	10	24.194	12.1	0
5562.5	10	23.61359	12.1	0
5625	10	23.61359	12	0
5656.25	10	23.42012	12	0
5718.75	10	23.22665	12	0
5750	11	22.83971	11.9	0
5812.5	12	23.22665	12	0
5843.75	12	22.83971	12	0
5906.25	12	22.45277	11.9	0
5937.5	12	22.83971	11.9	0
6000	12	22.83971	12	0
6031.25	13	22.45277	12	0
6093.75	13	21.87236	12.1	0
6125	13	21.67889	12.1	0
6156.25	13	22.2593	12.1	0
6218.75	13	21.09848	12.1	0
6250	13	21.67889	12.1	0
6312.5	14	21.67889	12.1	0
6343.75	14	21.09848	12.1	0
6375	14	21.09848	12.1	0
6406.25	14	21.09848	12.1	0
6468.75	14	21.29195	12.1	0
6500	14	20.71154	12.1	0
6531.25	14	20.71154	12	0
6593.75	14	20.71154	12	0
6625	15	20.71154	12	0
6656.25	15	20.3246	12	0
6687.5	15	20.13113	11.9	0
6718.75	15	20.13113	11.9	0
6781.25	16	19.93766	11.9	0
6812.5	16	19.74419	11.9	0
6843.75	16	19.55072	11.9	0
6875	17	19.74419	11.9	0
6906.25	17	19.35725	11.9	0
6937.5	17	19.55072	11.9	0
6968.75	17	19.16378	11.9	0
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 08:05 PM
  #25  
TurboTylerIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Originally Posted by razorlab
Here is a 2.4L 10:1 CR, E85, OG FPgreen, cossy cams, ported. This one is a little bit more average for timing and higher comp than the above example.

Code:
RPM	TimingAdv	JDMMAP	WideBandAF	KnockSum
2968.75	4	16.64867	12.8	0
3000	4	17.80949	12.7	0
3062.5	4	19.35725	12.7	0
3093.75	3	20.13113	12.6	0
3156.25	3	22.06583	12.6	0
3218.75	2	23.42012	12.6	0
3250	1	26.1287	12.6	0
3343.75	1	27.86993	12.5	0
3375	2	29.61116	12.5	0
3437.5	2	31.15892	12.4	0
3531.25	2	31.73933	12.3	0
3625	2	32.51321	12.3	0
3656.25	3	32.51321	12.4	0
3750	3	32.51321	12.3	0
3812.5	3	32.70668	12.3	0
3875	3	32.70668	12.2	0
3968.75	3	32.70668	12.2	0
4031.25	3	32.70668	12.2	0
4093.75	3	32.70668	12.3	0
4156.25	4	32.31974	12.3	0
4250	4	32.12627	12.2	0
4312.5	4	31.73933	12.1	0
4375	3	31.73933	12.1	1
4406.25	3	31.15892	12.1	1
4468.75	3	30.57851	12.2	1
4562.5	4	29.9981	12.2	1
4593.75	4	29.80463	12.2	1
4687.5	5	28.83728	12.2	1
4750	5	29.03075	12.2	1
4781.25	5	28.25687	12.2	0
4843.75	6	27.86993	12.2	0
4937.5	7	27.09605	12.2	0
4968.75	7	26.90258	12.2	0
5000	7	26.90258	12.2	0
5093.75	7	25.93523	12.2	0
5156.25	8	25.93523	12.1	0
5187.5	8	25.54829	12.2	0
5250	8	25.35482	12.1	0
5312.5	9	24.96788	12.1	0
5343.75	9	24.77441	12.1	0
5406.25	10	24.38747	12.1	0
5468.75	10	24.38747	12.1	0
5500	10	24.194	12.1	0
5562.5	10	23.61359	12.1	0
5625	10	23.61359	12	0
5656.25	10	23.42012	12	0
5718.75	10	23.22665	12	0
5750	11	22.83971	11.9	0
5812.5	12	23.22665	12	0
5843.75	12	22.83971	12	0
5906.25	12	22.45277	11.9	0
5937.5	12	22.83971	11.9	0
6000	12	22.83971	12	0
6031.25	13	22.45277	12	0
6093.75	13	21.87236	12.1	0
6125	13	21.67889	12.1	0
6156.25	13	22.2593	12.1	0
6218.75	13	21.09848	12.1	0
6250	13	21.67889	12.1	0
6312.5	14	21.67889	12.1	0
6343.75	14	21.09848	12.1	0
6375	14	21.09848	12.1	0
6406.25	14	21.09848	12.1	0
6468.75	14	21.29195	12.1	0
6500	14	20.71154	12.1	0
6531.25	14	20.71154	12	0
6593.75	14	20.71154	12	0
6625	15	20.71154	12	0
6656.25	15	20.3246	12	0
6687.5	15	20.13113	11.9	0
6718.75	15	20.13113	11.9	0
6781.25	16	19.93766	11.9	0
6812.5	16	19.74419	11.9	0
6843.75	16	19.55072	11.9	0
6875	17	19.74419	11.9	0
6906.25	17	19.35725	11.9	0
6937.5	17	19.55072	11.9	0
6968.75	17	19.16378	11.9	0
Awesome! Thanks razor, this is the kinda stuff I was hoping for. Much appreciated.
Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 04:50 AM
  #26  
jeffbeagley's Avatar
Evolving Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 364
Likes: 3
From: Springfield, MO
Originally Posted by razorlab
Here is a log from a 2.3L, E85, CBRD BBKB, Everything ported.

This car was happy with timing, this log was right about MBT and I dialed it back a degree or two after this.

This was also back before load clip was found. I'd say this was around 400 load at peak too. Boost @ 33-34psi peak

Code:
RPM	TimingAdv	WideBandAF	KnockSum	Load1B
3250	8	12.9	0	265.9375
3312.5	7	12.7	0	292.5
3468.75	6	12.6	0	318.125
3562.5	6	12.4	0	342.8125
3656.25	5	12.2	0	359.0625
3781.25	5	11.9	0	376.875
3906.25	5	11.6	0	379.6875
4125	6	11.8	0	379.6875
4281.25	6	12.1	0	379.6875
4406.25	6	12.2	0	379.6875
4562.5	7	12.1	0	379.6875
4718.75	8	11.8	0	379.6875
4812.5	9	11.8	0	379.6875
4937.5	10	11.8	0	379.0625
5062.5	10	11.8	0	379.6875
5250	10	11.5	1	379.6875
5375	11	11.5	1	379.6875
5500	13	11.6	0	379.375
5687.5	14	11.5	0	377.1875
5781.25	14	11.5	0	378.4375
5875	15	11.6	0	378.4375
6000	15	11.6	0	373.4375
6156.25	17	11.7	0	363.4375
6250	17	11.8	0	355.9375
6375	18	11.8	0	349.6875
6531.25	18	11.9	0	346.875
6625	18	11.9	0	344.375
6718.75	18	11.9	0	343.4375
6812.5	19	11.9	0	340
6937.5	19	12	0	336.875
7031.25	19	12	0	333.75
7093.75	19	12.1	0	331.25
7218.75	19	12	0	327.1875
7312.5	20	12	0	322.5
7375	20	12	0	320.3125
7437.5	20	12	0	316.25
7500	20	12	0	313.125
7625	20	12	0	308.75
7687.5	21	12.1	0	305.625
7781.25	21	12.2	0	301.25


Hope this helps
Jesus that's a lot of timing.
Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 08:13 AM
  #27  
TurboTylerIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
This is from last night. Still trying to get my AFRs where I want them.



Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 08:28 AM
  #28  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
A question here: Is there any point to running negative timing? When tuning I have always thought that if I have to go negative to keep knock at bay it is better just to turn the boost down until you can run some positive numbers, but I have never actually done any testing to confirm this.
Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 09:17 AM
  #29  
TurboTylerIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Originally Posted by wreckleford
A question here: Is there any point to running negative timing? When tuning I have always thought that if I have to go negative to keep knock at bay it is better just to turn the boost down until you can run some positive numbers, but I have never actually done any testing to confirm this.
From what I have learned you want to get the ignition timing to whatever it needs to be in order to produce maximum cylinder pressure at 15 to 20 degrees after TDC because that is what studies have shown to produce the most power.

The burn speed determines how fast that maximum cylinder pressure is developed and the burn speed is affected by your AFR. Around 12.5 afr for gasoline burns fastest, as you go leaner or richer from there is gets slower.

I have seen the big power guys running negative timing values like this...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ne-800whp.html

I'm not saying that I need to be running negative timing in my current application, I am just being timid and trying to stay safe on e85 since I just dropped so much coin on this 2.3L build and I haven't tuned on E85 before. I'll probably try for 1* max at peak load until I can get on a real dyno and can be more confident in finding mbt.
Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 01:28 PM
  #30  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by jeffbeagley
Jesus that's a lot of timing.
It was at MBT and the engine was lower compression. If you compare it to the other Evo I posted with 10:1 you can see the difference.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:19 PM.