When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Don't use the Async tables! THe Throttle tables make more sense, use them to make the same adjustments. It has been noted that the Async tables were mis labeled and scaled incorrectly. Further more, the Async tables in the definition file, are not Async tables, they are indeed throttle tables. The true Async tables are different, though you wont find them in a free .xml, like the one you are using that myself and Appuald put together back in 2012, which is the one I gave you, or maybe you got on here. Either way, the tables you see, are throttle tables, ignore the "Async" title that is misleading you.
Try these settings: You will probably have to play around with them a little, but to give you an Idea the way you need to go.
Last edited by Raceghost; Aug 11, 2018 at 10:59 PM.
Very interesting raceghost! I think this thread will help a lot of people. I will give these settings a try and play with those tables. So you’re saying there’s other xmls that are not free which contains more tables?
So i jacked each of those tables way up. It helped a bit but it still goes lean when taking off. Also, lets say im going over a speed bump in 2nd gear and i let off the clutch it will do it since the rpms with be around 1000 or so. I go into open loop mode and it will be fine. Theres something im missing. Ive tried to add fuel every which way i can. I dont know why its doing this. Funny thing is a couple seconds after I flash the car, turn it on, put it in first gear and go it’ll actually go rich instead of lean. My guess is the injectors are still on the timer for post cranking enrichment so they’re dumping fuel.
Last edited by nor11384; Aug 18, 2018 at 04:00 PM.
I thought with stock injectors we weren’t supposed to touch latency.
Also, i just realized that on 9417 the stock injector size is 599 on a stock tephra map and on 9653 it is set at 513. Why is this? Which is the correct one for stock injectors? Ive been on 599 the whole time.
Last edited by nor11384; Aug 19, 2018 at 04:26 PM.
Also, i just realized that on 9417 the stock injector size is 599 on a stock tephra map and on 9653 it is set at 513. Why is this? Which is the correct one for stock injectors? Ive been on 599 the whole time.
SHow the tables your using on scaling.
Yes, stock Injectors are 600 CC Injectors scaled to 513...
There are two scaling tables, on that shows the true size, and the the ECUFlash size.
You may have the True scaling Mitsubishi Size table defined for your Scalings.
Here they are. One picture is 9417 and the other is 9653. 9417 is what ive mostly been using this whole time. You can see that latency is identical in both roms but scaling is different. This is how it was when i downloaded the roms online. I havent touched any of these tables.
I thought with stock injectors we weren’t supposed to touch latency.
Also, i just realized that on 9417 the stock injector size is 599 on a stock tephra map and on 9653 it is set at 513. Why is this? Which is the correct one for stock injectors? Ive been on 599 the whole time.
On JDM GSR stock roms , Scaling we get is 542, for Tephra 9653 stock 513.
I will touch anything to get the desired results.
Yeah I can def try it. Just thought it was weird that the scaling on both roms were so different. I tried to lower it to 513 on 9417 and it will only go 510.
Hey bud, show the actuall defnition for the size scaling... of each of the roms. Then I will know if someone has played with the scaling in ECUFlash, adjusted the calculation in the scaling itself, etc.
SHow me this: See how in the same ROM here, I have two different scaling values. One is true Mitsubishi Scaling, and the other is ECUFlash scaling...
I think this is what youre asking for raceghost. My rom doesnt look anything like yours. Man, the rom xml of yours is pretty sweet. So much stuff. Wish i could get my hands on that. Here are the pics.
Post the same pics with the tabs for 94171715 and 96531706 tabs for me... I think it will show the calculation being used.
Actually, look at the Scalings in the .xmls listed as "Injector SIze Scaling" Within those definitions will be a calculation. You will probably see that within the actual .xml the scaling calculations for both roms will be different. I can help you fi it so you can have both calculations in each .xml, its actually pretty simple to do.
