Patch request discussion: rev-down maf clamp (stalling issue)
Jan 20, 2010, 10:16 PM
#17
Evolved Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I think collection of criteria is a hard part in this approach as well.
I would rather implement dynamic correction of MAF according to MDP (actually takiing advantage of both MAP and MAF worlds), but I cannot tell the consequences.
I would rather implement dynamic correction of MAF according to MDP (actually takiing advantage of both MAP and MAF worlds), but I cannot tell the consequences.
Jan 21, 2010, 04:30 AM
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
My .02
The idle dip, from my experience, has been related to the 0 load cell timing and the decel fuel cut delay tables. If you remove the 0 load cell the engine tries to interpolate where it should be. The conditions are always different during decel so the ECU never has a series of timing cells to go by. Also, if the decel tables are too high or too low there is issues on run down.
I see that a lot of "tuners" remove the 0 load cell, and several other drivability region loads. I do not recommend this.
I may be completely wrong....but this is what I believe the issues are from.
For me, I believe that anyone can basically tune for a WOT pull, but tuning for drivability seems much more important. After all, most people want both.
Paul
The idle dip, from my experience, has been related to the 0 load cell timing and the decel fuel cut delay tables. If you remove the 0 load cell the engine tries to interpolate where it should be. The conditions are always different during decel so the ECU never has a series of timing cells to go by. Also, if the decel tables are too high or too low there is issues on run down.
I see that a lot of "tuners" remove the 0 load cell, and several other drivability region loads. I do not recommend this.
I may be completely wrong....but this is what I believe the issues are from.
For me, I believe that anyone can basically tune for a WOT pull, but tuning for drivability seems much more important. After all, most people want both.
Paul
Jan 21, 2010, 05:22 AM
#19
I agree speed density is the ultimate solution. As a matter of act, when I had this problem with my DSM, I compeltely solved it by installing a GM MAF in blow-though.
However, I think we should be able to code this relatively simply. One of the devices that I was mentioning that does this sort of thing is the HKS EIDS. All it has is an input for the MAF Hz and TPS. So, I'm sure it's doing something along the lines of what I was mentioning above.
I think it would be good to include coolant temp and AC on/off just so cold start and AC conditions wouldn't be affected.
Eric
However, I think we should be able to code this relatively simply. One of the devices that I was mentioning that does this sort of thing is the HKS EIDS. All it has is an input for the MAF Hz and TPS. So, I'm sure it's doing something along the lines of what I was mentioning above.
I think it would be good to include coolant temp and AC on/off just so cold start and AC conditions wouldn't be affected.
Eric
Edit, here's a page from the manual on how the ECU+'s version works.
http://cid-a5ff1875a08be401.skydrive...anti-stall.pdf
Last edited by honki24; Jan 21, 2010 at 05:37 AM.
Feb 13, 2010, 08:42 PM
#21
Evolving Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My .02
The idle dip, from my experience, has been related to the 0 load cell timing and the decel fuel cut delay tables. If you remove the 0 load cell the engine tries to interpolate where it should be. The conditions are always different during decel so the ECU never has a series of timing cells to go by. Also, if the decel tables are too high or too low there is issues on run down.
I see that a lot of "tuners" remove the 0 load cell, and several other drivability region loads. I do not recommend this.
I may be completely wrong....but this is what I believe the issues are from.
For me, I believe that anyone can basically tune for a WOT pull, but tuning for drivability seems much more important. After all, most people want both.
Paul
The idle dip, from my experience, has been related to the 0 load cell timing and the decel fuel cut delay tables. If you remove the 0 load cell the engine tries to interpolate where it should be. The conditions are always different during decel so the ECU never has a series of timing cells to go by. Also, if the decel tables are too high or too low there is issues on run down.
I see that a lot of "tuners" remove the 0 load cell, and several other drivability region loads. I do not recommend this.
I may be completely wrong....but this is what I believe the issues are from.
For me, I believe that anyone can basically tune for a WOT pull, but tuning for drivability seems much more important. After all, most people want both.
Paul
I would really love to see a fix for this for us MAF users as I have no interest in going SD at this time.
Last edited by tnt1106; Apr 28, 2010 at 10:30 AM.
Apr 27, 2010, 04:04 PM
#23
Evolving Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
convert to SD still same issue (only with a/c on) rock solid with a/c off since SD. I have tried every posted suggestion thus far I have found.
edit: ISCV tables with rpm control suggested from another thread seem to be helping.
edit: ISCV tables with rpm control suggested from another thread seem to be helping.
Last edited by tnt1106; Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM.
Apr 11, 2011, 07:21 PM
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reviving this thread. Any solutions besides SD or a blow thru MAF? I run 94170715 My car consistently stalls if I clutch in after giving a little gas (happens in parking lots or the driveway).
Apr 11, 2011, 10:52 PM
#25
Look at a stock timing map. Notice a strange bump in timing thats completely out of place in the 0-1000rpm/60load area? This is for decel catch. If you have cams, large injectors or both, this area can SOMETIMES be adjusted to aid a bit as the fuel is being re-applied by the ECU.
-Jamie
(jack_of_trades)
-Jamie
(jack_of_trades)
May 31, 2011, 12:24 PM
#27
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it seems like there are a lot of us with this problem 
coming to a stop next to some ladies is usually awesome....unless I stall or my wife is in the car (I'm pretending she isn't over my shoulder right now)
coming to a stop next to some ladies is usually awesome....unless I stall or my wife is in the car (I'm pretending she isn't over my shoulder right now)
Aug 11, 2011, 03:27 PM
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mars
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am also reviving this thread, as I am on a stock rom but having the same exact issue. Has anyone EVER found a good fix as I have been searching and searching to no avail.
Aug 11, 2011, 05:51 PM
#30
Post a log of your car stumbling at idle during decel. DataLog the following: Timing, Airflow HZ, RPM and Load. I will see if I can't help out. The key is to find the engine load your car is seeing during the 'stumble'. It will most likely be between 60-90 load, around 500-1000 rpm.
-Jamie
-Jamie
Last edited by Dynotech Tuning; Aug 11, 2011 at 05:55 PM.