FIC 2150cc notes
Dec 6, 2009, 02:37 PM
#62
Wouldn't regular "E75" take less fuel then E75 cut with Q16 as Q16 requires more fuel system over gasoline due to the oxygenation of Q16? I know i have seen a decent increase in fuel need for Q16 over C16 for obvious reasons.... Not sure how it really compares with mixing Q16 to the crap gasoline they cut our out of the tank E85 with though... Which im sure right now is E70 due to winter blend being in full effect here.
Basically im trying to decide which way i need to go 1st with my fuel system. By looking at my fuel map i don't see the signs of losing fuel pressure ATM just running out of injector.... BUT i also haven't looked at the FP under a WOT pull yet to see for sure what its doing.....
Basically im trying to decide which way i need to go 1st with my fuel system. By looking at my fuel map i don't see the signs of losing fuel pressure ATM just running out of injector.... BUT i also haven't looked at the FP under a WOT pull yet to see for sure what its doing.....
Dec 6, 2009, 09:21 PM
#63
Like Aaron said Q VS gas seems about the same in AFR and going C16 can make you almost .5 ricer then most Gases out there.
I did Q because its what we had around and of course its alot denser then Ethanol.
On the Fuel pump subject one thing to keep in mind is with Aarons pump you will have to run a big FPR and return line to get control of fuel pressure or drop the voltage at low load. Ware as with the dual pumps you can activate the 2nd pump based on boost so there is no need for FPR, Big lines.
Another problem is the EVO has a siphon pump in the tank that is ran off the return line. This peace does not flow well either. So you would have to ditch this or do the low voltage to the fuel pump at light load. Cars with out this will run out of gas at about 1/4 tank.
I did Q because its what we had around and of course its alot denser then Ethanol.
On the Fuel pump subject one thing to keep in mind is with Aarons pump you will have to run a big FPR and return line to get control of fuel pressure or drop the voltage at low load. Ware as with the dual pumps you can activate the 2nd pump based on boost so there is no need for FPR, Big lines.
Another problem is the EVO has a siphon pump in the tank that is ran off the return line. This peace does not flow well either. So you would have to ditch this or do the low voltage to the fuel pump at light load. Cars with out this will run out of gas at about 1/4 tank.
Dec 6, 2009, 09:40 PM
#65
Not sure what you mean by hanger. I think if you are still trying to have your EVO gas tank work right you will have to do some kinda of pump controller that will lower voltage at low loads.
Like this http://www.aeromotiveinc.com/products.php?prod=277
On my Evo I have Dual Bosch 040 pumps external that each have there own 1/2in tube into the tank.
Like this http://www.aeromotiveinc.com/products.php?prod=277
On my Evo I have Dual Bosch 040 pumps external that each have there own 1/2in tube into the tank.
Dec 7, 2009, 04:32 AM
#69
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like Aaron said Q VS gas seems about the same in AFR and going C16 can make you almost .5 ricer then most Gases out there.
I did Q because its what we had around and of course its alot denser then Ethanol.
On the Fuel pump subject one thing to keep in mind is with Aarons pump you will have to run a big FPR and return line to get control of fuel pressure or drop the voltage at low load. Ware as with the dual pumps you can activate the 2nd pump based on boost so there is no need for FPR, Big lines.
Another problem is the EVO has a siphon pump in the tank that is ran off the return line. This peace does not flow well either. So you would have to ditch this or do the low voltage to the fuel pump at light load. Cars with out this will run out of gas at about 1/4 tank.
I did Q because its what we had around and of course its alot denser then Ethanol.
On the Fuel pump subject one thing to keep in mind is with Aarons pump you will have to run a big FPR and return line to get control of fuel pressure or drop the voltage at low load. Ware as with the dual pumps you can activate the 2nd pump based on boost so there is no need for FPR, Big lines.
Another problem is the EVO has a siphon pump in the tank that is ran off the return line. This peace does not flow well either. So you would have to ditch this or do the low voltage to the fuel pump at light load. Cars with out this will run out of gas at about 1/4 tank.
Dec 7, 2009, 02:46 PM
#74
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aaron, can you comment on the reliability of the 16306 aeromotive fuel pump speed controller? I drive my car long distances, sometimes 300 miles from home, and a failure would put me out. I think that controller with the magnafuel pump would be the ticket for my DSM and easier to wire than dual pumps.