Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Mustang Dyno or Dyno Dynamics?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:46 PM
  #31  
vboy425's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 1
From: Spec Ops
[QUOTE=DG Motors;6884425]
Originally Posted by mad_VIII
Same for dynodynamics. I think it is fair to say the two best, commonly used, all around dyno's in the states are mustang and dynodynamics. I know dyno4mance has had issues getting support from dynodynamics (for feature upgrades etc) but I think that is mainly because the dyno was not purchased through a us distributor, it was purchased from the UK and shipped over here.

I will agree by saying dynodynamics customer service is horrible. Especially from who I have to deal with up here on the east coast. Try getting a wide band sensor, it's like pulling teeth!

yep tech support for DD suck *****, but Luckily Enzo@Enzo Racing is a good friend of ours. So we don't have any issues. I waited 3 months to get my DD.


Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Mustang Dyno does not require punching in any weather info. Mustang Dyno's have a weather station that automatically calculate weather correction factor based on barometric pressure and altitude.
interesting cause i have know couple of MD didn't have one. Maybe the owner rather punching in numbers. Thanks for clearing that up.

Last edited by vboy425; Apr 4, 2009 at 12:08 AM.
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 07:01 AM
  #32  
ourflat's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: USA
Yep, my MD AWD 500 has a really nice weather station pack. All instruments are made in Germany and come with a calibration certificate from their manufacture.

Frank
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #33  
jasonwalton's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
What about DynaPack?
Doesn't tire slip and extra rolling inertia disturb the results?
The DynaPack gets you closer to the power.
You don't want to pull out the motor and measure it's power alone because it's important to see what your flywheel, transmission, transfer case, and differentials are doing to your power and what your real world power is.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #34  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by jasonwalton
What about DynaPack?
Doesn't tire slip and extra rolling inertia disturb the results?
The DynaPack gets you closer to the power.
You don't want to pull out the motor and measure it's power alone because it's important to see what your flywheel, transmission, transfer case, and differentials are doing to your power and what your real world power is.
There is not extra rolling inertia if the car weighs more than the rollers.

Our rollers weigh 2151.92lbs and any additional load is added by the eddy brake.

Wheels do not spin on an awd car with 12.5" rollers locked together with an AWD belt.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #35  
Freddy302's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: CT
Originally Posted by noize
dyno dynamics poop all over mustang dynos. They are both eddy current dynos, you can adjust the ramp rate, and partial throttle load cell on both.

The difference is the software on the mustang units is crude in comparison. The graph outputs look like color crayon drawings from mustangs and the precision for graph analysis isn't there. The dd output is in real time, which i love if you have an event, because you can abort mid run. Heck, compare their prices. I've used a dd exclusively for 5 years and i'm not going back unless i have to.

+1
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #36  
linuxman51's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: montgomery, al
I prefer tuning cars on a Mustang Dyno, takes less time and usually gets better (Drive-able, etc) results.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #37  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Year old off topic bump fail.

Closed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Decker@Forged
Vendor Announcements
13
Jun 29, 2016 08:32 AM
cnote2
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
0
Jun 10, 2016 08:37 PM
Alfordz123
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
19
Feb 11, 2015 12:09 PM
babaz7
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
1
Oct 1, 2011 11:08 PM
1slowassevo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
Jul 12, 2010 08:54 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:01 AM.