526whp 425tq Pump Gas HTA3582
526whp 425tq Pump Gas HTA3582
526whp 425tq
TurboTrix Drop in set up...Manley TT, Weisco HD
AEM EMS
Kelford 280
Suprtech Valve Springs
RNR Manifold
HTA3582 5 bolt .63 back housing
3" o2 housing
stock IM / TB / head
TTR Fuel System
Pump 93 octane 27 lbs. boost
I want to thank TurboTrix Racing Mark ( aka Frenchy Tuning ) Kieth ( Bean, Wally ) Jeff ( Tony Hawk) Manny ( Mannylito...Guat...Mini Ricky Martin I could go on and on...lol!!!)
Thanks Boys
Got to get to the track now...master this set up...then some Q16 coming to turn the whick up!!!
TurboTrix Drop in set up...Manley TT, Weisco HD
AEM EMS
Kelford 280
Suprtech Valve Springs
RNR Manifold
HTA3582 5 bolt .63 back housing
3" o2 housing
stock IM / TB / head
TTR Fuel System
Pump 93 octane 27 lbs. boost
I want to thank TurboTrix Racing Mark ( aka Frenchy Tuning ) Kieth ( Bean, Wally ) Jeff ( Tony Hawk) Manny ( Mannylito...Guat...Mini Ricky Martin I could go on and on...lol!!!)
Thanks Boys
Got to get to the track now...master this set up...then some Q16 coming to turn the whick up!!!
Glad your finally making some powa!!
The graph reminds me of a question you asked me a few months ago...
Good luck at the track!
The graph reminds me of a question you asked me a few months ago...
Good luck at the track!
huh? my graph looks great...its a 500whp car...not 800...and the tq is smooth...the cams are really overkill on a stock im car...they are huge..
once that goes on you'll see ...
once that goes on you'll see ...
Trending Topics
What is wrong with the graph? The car makes over 500whp from 6200rpm to 8200rpm. Not too bad for pump gas and a stock, untouched intake manifold. The other graph you are talking about did not have a very good powerband as it just barely touched 800whp and nosed over very quickly. Maybe you could post that graph to refresh our memory. Your trying to compare a graph of a car on pump gas and low boost to a car running race gas and high boost.
Keith
What is wrong with the graph? The car makes over 500whp from 6200rpm to 8200rpm. Not too bad for pump gas and a stock, untouched intake manifold. The other graph you are talking about did not have a very good powerband as it just barely touched 800whp and nosed over very quickly. Maybe you could post that graph to refresh our memory. Your trying to compare a graph of a car on pump gas and low boost to a car running race gas and high boost.
Keith
Keith
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwarəs- to cut
Date: 1550
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2 a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b: the use or language of sarcasm"
Who said anything was wrong with his graph? Who said anything about comparing results?
You seem to remember alot about that graph, so I don't think you need your memory refreshed.
No need to really discuss it further since you'll just end up waving the "Harry Potter/vendor magic wand" and "poofing" my posts away...




The thing is going to be ungodly fast on Q and big boost!
