Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

578hp/420tq @ 22psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #16  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #17  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Originally Posted by JuniorAWD
Can you take a picture of that same run, but hit the space bar so the CF shows up?
Anything else? I'm not bull****ting anyone here. I know dyno numbers don't really mean **** other than a way to measure changes. In fact, I'll post up the camparo runs from my highest stock turbo dyno run with this one to show the changes.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #18  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #19  
kouzman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
With so much power this car should trap 130+ mph easily. Are you guys hitting the track any time soon?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 04:08 PM
  #20  
JuniorAWD's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Matt, the only thing I have doubts about is the boost.

Congrats on the numbers man, and way to man up and show the CF. Even if its more boost then it shows, that car should be a mid 130mph car!!

Junior
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #21  
k2boarder3187's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by JuniorAWD
Matt, the only thing I have doubts about is the boost.

Congrats on the numbers man, and way to man up and show the CF. Even if its more boost then it shows, that car should be a mid 130mph car!!

Junior
Exactly, cars making big power at such low boost....
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 07:36 PM
  #22  
Dave@TTP's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
LOL at the Description on the dyno sheet.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #23  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Originally Posted by JuniorAWD
Matt, the only thing I have doubts about is the boost.

Congrats on the numbers man, and way to man up and show the CF. Even if its more boost then it shows, that car should be a mid 130mph car!!

Junior
I don't know what to tell you guys. Keep in mind, I have a lot of stuff to optimize airflow: a 2.3ltr block, 4" unrestricted intake, 2.5" IC piping, 75mm TB, SMIM, Buschur stage 3 ported head, full buschur turboback exhaust. Perhaps my setup just allows for a higher airflow at lower pressures. When I get it back on the dyno, I can take pictures of my ZT-2 display, Labonte display, the dyno display and I'll even post the evoscan logs off the JDM 3bar MAP sensor. I'm not trying to con anyone, I have absolutely no reason to.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #24  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
95ft lbs far exceeds the specs on ARP standard headstuds.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #25  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
95ft lbs far exceeds the specs on ARP standard headstuds.
You're right Scott, which is why I refused to do what Dave suggested and had the o-rings removed. Every time I installed the head, I torqued to 85 ftlbs, per ARP sepcs when using motor oil for the lubricant. An additional 10 lbs would not have helped the headgasket seal any better and would have possibly led to stud failure. As for the torque wrench being out of cal, after Dave said the wrench was probably off calibration, I took it to the cal lab at the Navy base I work on and had them check the cal specs. It was within .05% @ 150ft lbs. At this point, I'm just glad the car is running correctly and doing better than I expected, despite the naysayers and nutswingers.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #26  
dsevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: Kailua, HI
I thought o-rings were supposed to be like .006in. .020 seems like a lot. Sick numbers though.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #27  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Originally Posted by dsevo
I thought o-rings were supposed to be like .006in. .020 seems like a lot. Sick numbers though.
From the research I did, the general consensus is the o-rings should protrude no more than 25% of the total gasket thickness:

Recommended O-ring protrusion is not more than 25 percent gasket thickness. Example: Gasket thickness .043˝, O-ring protrusion height is .008˝ to .010˝. This standard works with all thicknesses that are .050˝ and less. Gaskets that are thicker than .050˝ do not require ring height more than .012˝.
If I use a 1.2mm (.047") head gasket, then recommended o-ring protrusion should be no more than .012"
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 06:36 AM
  #28  
Freddy302's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: CT
Originally Posted by batty200
587/1.12=525 so that is the uncorrected #'s. SAE asserts that if the correction factor is above 3% it should be ignored and it is NOT to be used to compensate for altitude either. Good numbers either way.
Wow these are very impressive #'s! with 525 uncorrected on a DD my car runs around 136-138 mph in the quarter mile at 3400 lbs. If you do that with 22psi.. you have found the best combo to date for the evo! your gonna have a line out the door..

Good luck with the car
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 09:37 AM
  #29  
jid2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Glad your car is treating you right. The green didn't last long

Are you using the new speed density patch?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #30  
mixmastermatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Originally Posted by jid2
Glad your car is treating you right. The green didn't last long

Are you using the new speed density patch?
I never even ran it with the green, lol. A deal too good to pass up came along for the FS635 kit, so I decided to go with it.

I'm still using the speed density patch that Bez wrote for me back in the summer of 2007. I tried briefly to convert to John's s/d patch, but the car wouldn't stay running with it, so I switched back.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 PM.