TTP Engineering

iTrader: (465)

That sounds like a definite combo for 400+. You might consider moving to an internally dumped O2 housing when you change the turbo. Expelling the exhaust gasses through the exhaust system will insure that the wideband AFR can be measured perfectly and without any dilution from outside air.

surferjeff

iTrader: (6)

Awesome work TTP and congrats to the owner! You are now part of the E85 club! Scott tuned me to 530whp on the red and E82. Best of luck.

cinek

iTrader: (2)

I know that AWD have dealt with EPM dump on many evo's with good results.I'll give it a try

TTP Engineering

iTrader: (465)

What is interesting is how David Buschur has stated that external dump O2 housings do not add power either, the same results we have found in our dyno testing.

If they made power, we are sure that Dave would be making them.

Evo Girlie

iTrader: (55)

take it to the track and let's see what it traps

big block ix

iTrader: (1)

This car Wouldn't even produce those numbers on a Mustang and its a 2.3L :

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...q-453-whp.html

Casper.

iTrader: (3)

There is evidence everywhere that the external dumps work. You are the only person who doesnt believe in them, why is that?

marcovgv

iTrader: (1)

we plan to. but the purpose of the car is not for 1\4 mile. I just have never been into the straight line stuff. to see some number why not

TTP Engineering

iTrader: (465)

You have a $40,000.00 MR, and I don't blame you. The 6sp transmission was not designed for extreme torque. We lost our 6sp at only 16,000 miles $4571.00.

marcovgv

iTrader: (1)

what we want is a car that will road race well as a total package reliably. if I was so crazy about just building a tq monster high hp car that was just for 1/4mile i would do just that. the car will shine at the track where it matters. Ask scott when we came to him to get this car tuned we didnt tell him " it has to make 500 hp". We told him what we wanted to do with the car and we have been putting together a plan on how to get there. We have been conservative taking all the right precautions and doing things the right way so everything is safe and reliable.

big block ix

iTrader: (1)

Did you tell him to make 500+TQ?

That's what it takes on a dynojet to make 450tq+ on most mustangs..

I don't think ANYONE is making that on the stock turbo/motor stg 1 car with Kelfords on E-85

These are Ridiculous numbers and I think its wrong for them to inflate their results..

TTP Engineering

iTrader: (465)

Torque is higher on Dynojets than Mustang dynos in my experience as well as with customers who have done back to back testing on our dyno.

Who said anything about "stage 1" and what is your definition of stage 1?

Your post does not make any sense.

This car is a TTP Stage III and will be moving to stage IV on Thursday.

The dyno is factory calibrated and no figure has ever been changed on it.

big block ix

iTrader: (1)

When you say stg 3

Do You mean adding a downpipe test and Cat-back ?

HILARIOUS

TTP Engineering

iTrader: (465)

You need to go reread the modifications list. It appears you were to predisposed with critiquing the numbers achieved that you did not even read the mods list.

Let me help you:

downpipe, testpipe and catback exhaust.
INJEN intake kit with full upper and lower pipes.
GReddy Profec B-II EBC.
TX272 Kelford cams for the Evo 9,
Supertech single springs
ARP head studs.
walbro 255LPH HP
Modified stock IX BOV
TTP Ethamax 1250cc injectors
AMSOIL's Racing Dominator oil in the 10w30 blend
AMSOIL MTG synthetic for the 6sp transmission

25-26psi on 93, 387whp/384wtq

E82 Ethanol tune 412whp before turning up the boost
28-30psi and achieving 432whp and 450wtq

Fast_Freddie

iTrader: (50)

It just seems like their Mustang reads like a Dynojet... at the end of the day, its just a number for what you produced before, and what you produced afterwards... I don't understand why everyone gets so butt hurt about dyno numbers and what they seem to read...