Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Tuned at TTP.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 07:55 AM
  #16  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
Here's the problem as I see it:

1) TTP (or customer) posts a graph
2) Compsciboi bumps it and cheerleads
3) People get all bent about the props and have to call out the dyno
4) Off topic trainwreck ensues.

People, #2, #3, and #4 do not need to be a part of this at all. This is a dyno results thread.
It has been well documented on the site how TTP's dyno reads. Scott has provided time and again baseline numbers for comparison. He's not baselining low and wicking it up, it reads what it reads.

I am beyond tired of posting and explaining this. It is stupid that people lack the self control to not post in the thread.

Here's what needs to happen:

If you are just going to bench race or call out the dyno, don't bother to even post in this thread (BLKCarbonEVO).

If you just want to be a cheerleader and stir the hornet's nest, don't bother to post (the original post by compscibOi).

If you choose to ignore the warning, get ready to be put in time out. I don't have time to play thread watcher all day for people who can't be tactful.

Last edited by Noize; Mar 10, 2010 at 08:04 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 08:03 AM
  #17  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by compscibOi
While a dyno is only a number - it should be within range of others who are tuned on the same dyno. There are many who visit this facility that you can realistically compare your power to. While peak numbers are something to "brag" about, the area under the curve, drivability and if you were happy with the shops experience is what counts.

I actually agree with this 100%.
Stop the dyno wars already, people!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 10:30 AM
  #18  
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 15
From: Lexington Park, MD
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
The numbers are uncorrected and the blurred info is his tag number and name. 1.00% correction factor.

92% INJECTOR DUTY CYCLE ON BASELINE STREET TUNE FROM 2007.

103.8% INJECTOR DUTY CYCLE ON CUSTOM DYNO TUNE 3/5/2010.


Thanks for playing.

I'm confused the run was uncorrected (no WSC) with a 1% correction factor (dyno correction)
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #19  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddie
I'm confused the run was uncorrected (no WSC) with a 1% correction factor (dyno correction)
He means 1.0 or 1:1. 100%, no correction.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #20  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Originally Posted by Noize
Here's the problem as I see it:

1) TTP (or customer) posts a graph
2) Compsciboi bumps it and cheerleads
3) People get all bent about the props and have to call out the dyno
4) Off topic trainwreck ensues.

People, #2, #3, and #4 do not need to be a part of this at all. This is a dyno results thread.
It has been well documented on the site how TTP's dyno reads. Scott has provided time and again baseline numbers for comparison. He's not baselining low and wicking it up, it reads what it reads.

I am beyond tired of posting and explaining this. It is stupid that people lack the self control to not post in the thread.

Here's what needs to happen:

If you are just going to bench race or call out the dyno, don't bother to even post in this thread (BLKCarbonEVO).

If you just want to be a cheerleader and stir the hornet's nest, don't bother to post (the original post by compscibOi).

If you choose to ignore the warning, get ready to be put in time out. I don't have time to play thread watcher all day for people who can't be tactful.
This by far is one of the best things i have seen a mod say in a long time.... I think you hit that one on the head.

Sounds like the car feels nice...
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #21  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL




Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #22  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
who is ITP ?

Looks like someone needs a new sticker
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #23  
hmsevo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: florida
Unhappy

Originally Posted by bigric09
who is ITP ?

Looks like someone needs a new sticker
Lol I agree. I guess some hater ripped it off My car.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #24  
vicksen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: East of things.
Originally Posted by Luis@TTP
With who's tuning? At what AFR? With what ignition timing? With what intake manifold? At what boost pressure? With what cams? With what compression pistons?

Claiming that injectors max out at XXX whp without knowing the above information is a foolish display of ignorance.
Okay, I'll play. Who's doing the tuning? What was the AFR at? Where was the timing? What intake manifold are you using? How much boost? What pistons are you running?
I'm guessing that because there was nothing listed in the OPs sig about an IM upgrade, high compression drop in pistons (or and engine build) that those parts are sill factory. Also one can speculate that when someone goes to ttp to get a tune the tuner would be the TTP house tuner, but that's just speculation. As for the timing and afr's, I'm hesitant to speculate. If my assumptions and speculations are wrong feel free to correct me, and if you'd like to fill in the blank i doubt anyone will get upset.
Thanks Louie
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #25  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by hmsevo9mr
Lol I agree. I guess some hater ripped it off My car.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #26  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Those decals have lasted a many years. Time to renew!
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #27  
yahu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,282
Likes: 0
From: Monroe - WA
Originally Posted by hmsevo9mr
Lol I agree. I guess some hater ripped it off My car.
Wasn't BlkCarbonEvo in FL a couple months ago?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 04:54 PM
  #28  
DIGGER9's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Those decals have lasted a many years. Time to renew!
Mine rip off from the torque
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 05:52 PM
  #29  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by yahu
Wasn't BlkCarbonEvo in FL a couple months ago?
Good one Dan

Mikey
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #30  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by DIGGER9
Mine rip off from the torque
Due to forum rules we can't expound on that further.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 PM.