Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

BBK Full turbo 93 octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 06:11 PM
  #1  
evo4life400's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
BBK Full turbo 93 octane

hey everyone i got my evo tuned today by junior at The Shop in CT and i am very pleased with my numbers. we agreed to stop at only 25psi because this car needs to last for me and i was more than happy with the results! thanks jimmy and junior!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXCMuOje_pY
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 06:15 PM
  #2  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
That's nice
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 06:58 PM
  #3  
kouzman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
congrat man!

Junior is the man!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
evo4life400's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
thanks guys!! the car scares the he'll out of me
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 07:41 PM
  #5  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Correction factor? Mode?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #6  
digitalmethods's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Worcester, MA
Nice. Do you have before and after numbers for the cams?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #7  
evo4life400's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
with a 1.0 correction i made 370 or something like that. he said i would trap over 120 though!!!

as for the cams...i do not have a before and after but they definitely help!!!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 08:42 PM
  #8  
kouzman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by evo4life400
with a 1.0 correction i made 370 or something like that. he said i would trap over 120 though!!!

as for the cams...i do not have a before and after but they definitely help!!!
he is right.

when i had the 3065 on the car at 372 on 1.0 i was trapping 121 full weight on pump and thats a fact...
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 08:47 PM
  #9  
evo4life400's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Originally Posted by kouzman
he is right.

when i had the 3065 on the car at 372 on 1.0 i was trapping 121 full weight on pump and thats a fact...
hey man, thats funny you posted here....junior was mentioning you today when we were talking about if i should raise the boost anymore or not
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #10  
kouzman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
personally i would drive the car as is.

at your power level you have a very fast car with a lot of midrange. you can of course increase boost but if you are on the stock block i would prefer to keep things safe. You cn get a tune for the track if you drag race but for road racing or street driving i would just enjoy the car!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #11  
evo4life400's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Originally Posted by kouzman
personally i would drive the car as is.

at your power level you have a very fast car with a lot of midrange. you can of course increase boost but if you are on the stock block i would prefer to keep things safe. You cn get a tune for the track if you drag race but for road racing or street driving i would just enjoy the car!
yeah i dont plan on tracking the car so i am very happy with the results. i am good the way the car is!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #12  
Brsox10288's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 389
Likes: 1
From: Md
Nice numbers man!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #13  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by evo4life400
with a 1.0 correction i made 370 or something like that. he said i would trap over 120 though!!!

as for the cams...i do not have a before and after but they definitely help!!!
So what correction factor was it at for the 444 Run?

Wait let me guess... 444/370= 1.20

Why so much correction factor? Most people use 1.15 to get dynojet numbers, but...?


No trying to hate and/or start another stupid dyno/CF debate/argument, but ..........

Also why not just post up the CF 1.00 chart?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 10:55 PM
  #14  
atkins's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Shoot out mode?????? Standardized
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2010 | 03:06 AM
  #15  
evo4life400's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
the 1.00 correction is in that graph as well......i could have easily went to 28psi but i liked it right where it was and so did junior on a pretty low boost level
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 AM.