ETS TS T3 HTA 3586 w 1.06
Jul 24, 2010, 07:57 PM
#31
It looks like your boost control or tuning is off based on the boost and torque curve.
It doesn't look right...
it honestly looks like you're missing around 8 degrees of ignition advance between 4 and 5k. What were your AFRs? Have a hard time dialing them in? AFR seem to jump around a lot?
It doesn't look right...
it honestly looks like you're missing around 8 degrees of ignition advance between 4 and 5k. What were your AFRs? Have a hard time dialing them in? AFR seem to jump around a lot?
Jul 27, 2010, 08:59 AM
#34
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: s.c.
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no need to go through threads, i am gonna tell right now. This ETS t3 3586 kit made around 515 whp on bone stock evo X around 25 psi. pump gas. I assume the evo 8, 9 could be pretty closed to it. Call michael@ETS , he will let u know more. This kit are one of the best around.
Jul 27, 2010, 09:25 PM
#35
no need to go through threads, i am gonna tell right now. This ETS t3 3586 kit made around 515 whp on bone stock evo X around 25 psi. pump gas. I assume the evo 8, 9 could be pretty closed to it. Call michael@ETS , he will let u know more. This kit are one of the best around.
Needs some correction...
1) Bone stock on pump ETS did 457hp @22psi (not 25psi nor 515hp)
2) Ivey did the 515hp and that was 22psi (not 25psi) and on a built motor, not stock!
3) Both ETS and Ivey used a Single Scroll T3 3586 .63a/r...
laying everything else aside that you said incorrectly, you also can't compare the 4B11 to the 4G63 and you certiantly can't compare data between the SS 3586 on a 4B11 and the TS 3586 we are discussing for the 4G63.
Mikey
Jul 28, 2010, 07:22 AM
#36
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: s.c.
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He should be looking through the threads, and not listening to people that tell him wrong information...
Needs some correction...
1) Bone stock on pump ETS did 457hp @22psi (not 25psi nor 515hp)
2) Ivey did the 515hp and that was 22psi (not 25psi) and on a built motor, not stock!
3) Both ETS and Ivey used a Single Scroll T3 3586 .63a/r...
laying everything else aside that you said incorrectly, you also can't compare the 4B11 to the 4G63 and you certiantly can't compare data between the SS 3586 on a 4B11 and the TS 3586 we are discussing for the 4G63.
Mikey
Needs some correction...
1) Bone stock on pump ETS did 457hp @22psi (not 25psi nor 515hp)
2) Ivey did the 515hp and that was 22psi (not 25psi) and on a built motor, not stock!
3) Both ETS and Ivey used a Single Scroll T3 3586 .63a/r...
laying everything else aside that you said incorrectly, you also can't compare the 4B11 to the 4G63 and you certiantly can't compare data between the SS 3586 on a 4B11 and the TS 3586 we are discussing for the 4G63.
Mikey
Jul 28, 2010, 10:03 AM
#38
Anyways, bigric09, where's the updated numbers? Surely you have a bigger fuel system in this thing by now!
Jul 28, 2010, 10:36 AM
#39
He should be looking through the threads, and not listening to people that tell him wrong information...
Needs some correction...
1) Bone stock on pump ETS did 457hp @22psi (not 25psi nor 515hp)
2) Ivey did the 515hp and that was 22psi (not 25psi) and on a built motor, not stock!
3) Both ETS and Ivey used a Single Scroll T3 3586 .63a/r...
laying everything else aside that you said incorrectly, you also can't compare the 4B11 to the 4G63 and you certiantly can't compare data between the SS 3586 on a 4B11 and the TS 3586 we are discussing for the 4G63.
Mikey
Needs some correction...
1) Bone stock on pump ETS did 457hp @22psi (not 25psi nor 515hp)
2) Ivey did the 515hp and that was 22psi (not 25psi) and on a built motor, not stock!
3) Both ETS and Ivey used a Single Scroll T3 3586 .63a/r...
laying everything else aside that you said incorrectly, you also can't compare the 4B11 to the 4G63 and you certiantly can't compare data between the SS 3586 on a 4B11 and the TS 3586 we are discussing for the 4G63.
Mikey
In for new numbers
Jul 28, 2010, 11:11 AM
#40
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: s.c.
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Results...
Graph posted is at 28psi and running out of injectors around 6000 to 6500 rpm.
Epic Motorsports Mustang Dyno
Base pull made 415/340 at 26psi with no timing
Final pull made 470/420 at 28psi running out of injectors.
With fuel, the car should sit pretty close to 500 to 525 on 93 Oct on our Mustang Dyno.
On the dyno 28 psi comes around 5300 rpm
On the street however, 28psi is right about 4700 rpm
Review of setup.
Overall I thought the HP would be higher while TQ would be lower. I'm sure the numbers will go up with bigger injectors. The kit feels like a monster on the street. In 2nd it feels like the damn front wheels come off the ground. I'd have to say I'm pretty happy with the results for now and can't believe how well this kit fits. ETS crammed a lot of stuff into a compact well designed kit.
Mod List:
ETS HTA 3586 TST3 mani w/1.06 hotside
Wiseco drop ins (stock compression)
Eagle rods
Ported Intake Mani
ETS 3.5 IC
HKS HiPower Catback
Spoolin up COP
PTE 1000s
GSC Beehive springs w/ stock retainers
Cosworth 272s
Engine Bay:
Dyno Graph:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Here is the comparison between my last setup...
T3 GT35R w/ 82 hotside. Same boost controller, same mods basically as i have now.
The solid lines are my current setup and the dotted the previous
Thanks for looking.
Graph posted is at 28psi and running out of injectors around 6000 to 6500 rpm.
Epic Motorsports Mustang Dyno
Base pull made 415/340 at 26psi with no timing
Final pull made 470/420 at 28psi running out of injectors.
With fuel, the car should sit pretty close to 500 to 525 on 93 Oct on our Mustang Dyno.
On the dyno 28 psi comes around 5300 rpm
On the street however, 28psi is right about 4700 rpm
Review of setup.
Overall I thought the HP would be higher while TQ would be lower. I'm sure the numbers will go up with bigger injectors. The kit feels like a monster on the street. In 2nd it feels like the damn front wheels come off the ground. I'd have to say I'm pretty happy with the results for now and can't believe how well this kit fits. ETS crammed a lot of stuff into a compact well designed kit.
Mod List:
ETS HTA 3586 TST3 mani w/1.06 hotside
Wiseco drop ins (stock compression)
Eagle rods
Ported Intake Mani
ETS 3.5 IC
HKS HiPower Catback
Spoolin up COP
PTE 1000s
GSC Beehive springs w/ stock retainers
Cosworth 272s
Engine Bay:
Dyno Graph:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Here is the comparison between my last setup...
T3 GT35R w/ 82 hotside. Same boost controller, same mods basically as i have now.
The solid lines are my current setup and the dotted the previous
Thanks for looking.
Jul 28, 2010, 11:22 AM
#41
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can not compare the two engines.... That is like comparing a f20 vs a 4g63. The F20 flows a hell of a lot better and WILL make more POWER at LOWER boost levels. I don't understand what you can't understand. You claim to be an "Xpert" per your sig but you sound like a complete idiot.... Sorry man.
Jul 28, 2010, 04:47 PM
#42
You can not compare the two engines.... That is like comparing a f20 vs a 4g63. The F20 flows a hell of a lot better and WILL make more POWER at LOWER boost levels. I don't understand what you can't understand. You claim to be an "Xpert" per your sig but you sound like a complete idiot.... Sorry man.
Mikey
Last edited by BLKCarbonEVO; Jul 28, 2010 at 05:41 PM.
