Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

E85 Fp black, stock block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:02 PM
  #46  
leonevox's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: s.c.
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
You know you didn't have to post anything!!! You can close your thread for all I give a ****!

Mikey
chill out brother. Let's discuss more about fp black on e85
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:03 PM
  #47  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by leonevox
chill out brother. Let's discuss more about fp black on e85
If you want to do that then you can go to my thread. I'm done with this one!

Mikey
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #48  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Kasey
Mikey has a point, the 03 engine is a little weaker. Your are referring to a 35r compared to a black that is spooling around 400 to 500 rpms faster. Although, I do think this dyno is reading a little higher than a dynojet. To the Op, I think you have a fun ride and nice power curve! So I hope you enjoy it.


Where did you get your info? Don't talk anymore.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #49  
Timmay81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
Originally Posted by tsi20gawd
Hey ease up guys after all This sucker Is JM tuned dont you know who your messin with lol
and there is something wrong with that? Jake's tunes have always been top notch for me and all of the people i know. Anyone that can go 8.66 in a talon obviously knows what they are doing

Originally Posted by leonevox
nice number dude, bet it is pretty fast car, but you better start saving up for the new block.

yea it feel damn good and ive turned it down a notch for everyday use , that and i really dont rod the **** out of my car so im not to worried about my motor right now. Hopefully over winter i will be 2.3 anyway then i can see what that black really can do
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:15 PM
  #50  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Even if this dyno reads a little high I don't think 28-29 psi on the stock block is unsafe especially on a good e85 tune.

And I don't think 450tq is the automatic breaking point for the motor even on a DJ.

Good work by JM on the tune, looks like a fun ride timmay. Where in idaho do you live?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #51  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by project_skyline


Where did you get your info? Don't talk anymore.
I didn't say anything about the 03 having a weaker block... wtf... That was Kasey that used to work for MAP that said that. So hope you are not directing that towards me!

Mikey
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:24 PM
  #52  
Timmay81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
i dont think any of those guys were saying you said it mikey

skyline im in eastern idaho(pocatello)
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #53  
evodude32's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
I didn't say anything about the 03 having a weaker block... wtf... That was Kasey that used to work for MAP that said that. So hope you are not directing that towards me!

Mikey
Mikey, he didn't quote you, he quoted Kasey, stop being so touchy about it,,holy cow..
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #54  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Just seemed like everyone got their **** in a bind when I say be careful with the tq on the stock motor.

I see a lot of people losing the stock motor becuase of tuners. Boost isn't the problem as much as the cyclinder pressure and tq numbers. I believe that all stock motor should never see more than 15* timing or more than 425tq if you expect for it to last. jmo

Mikey
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #55  
Timmay81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
i fully agree on the tuning, tq numbers depend i think over reving would cause more stress personally

im not doubting what your saying, like i said above ive turned it down a touch so less to worry about

and btw my peak timing is about 16 deg

Last edited by Timmay81; Jun 15, 2010 at 02:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #56  
evodude32's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
One thing that you need to account for is elevation, at higher elevations you can get away with a tad more timing. Timmay is at 5000 feet of elevation. At sea level obviously timing would be a bit lower.
Elevation plays another roll in cylinder pressures. So 2 degrees at peak boost/tq and 16 degrees peak RPM (7700rpm) is not going to hurt the motor, not on E85 and 5000 feet of elevation anyway.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #57  
Insanity Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 215
Likes: 3
From: Sacramento
Sick numbers. When does it fully spool? Also what turbo did you come from previously? I'm trying to decide if I should just sell my red since it's not installed and get a black lol.

Also on another note, what causes people to throw rods? Is it from the rod bolts breaking?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #58  
Timmay81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
id have to check logs to see RPM it depends on where i go from, i want to say around 5-5500 im full boost, i came from a gay *** buschur 20g, made 400/400 on it last year on e85

Last edited by Timmay81; Jun 15, 2010 at 02:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #59  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
I didn't say anything about the 03 having a weaker block... wtf... That was Kasey that used to work for MAP that said that. So hope you are not directing that towards me!

Mikey
Of course not man!

Originally Posted by Timmay81
i dont think any of those guys were saying you said it mikey

skyline im in eastern idaho(pocatello)
Nice, my sister lives in Challis and so we got thru Pocatello on our way up there. Next time I come thru we should meet up, I'd like to check out your car.

Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
Just seemed like everyone got their **** in a bind when I say be careful with the tq on the stock motor.

I see a lot of people losing the stock motor becuase of tuners. Boost isn't the problem as much as the cyclinder pressure and tq numbers. I believe that all stock motor should never see more than 15* timing or more than 425tq if you expect for it to last. jmo

Mikey
I wasn't saying you were wrong I just disagree to an extent. As far as the stock SB goes TQ isn't the ultimate factor. Its dangerously high spikes in cylinder pressures which comes from detonation. With a good tune things can be kept together pretty well. Each motor is different and yes there is a certain safe limit for TQ on the stock bottom end but I don't think its automatically 425TQ or 15* of timing.

Originally Posted by evodude32
One thing that you need to account for is elevation, at higher elevations you can get away with a tad more timing. Timmay is at 5000 feet of elevation. At sea level obviously timing would be a bit lower.
Elevation plays another roll in cylinder pressures. So 2 degrees at peak boost/tq and 16 degrees peak RPM (7700rpm) is not going to hurt the motor, not on E85 and 5000 feet of elevation anyway.
Also 8's and 9's take different timing.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #60  
evodude32's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Of course not man!



Nice, my sister lives in Challis and so we got thru Pocatello on our way up there. Next time I come thru we should meet up, I'd like to check out your car.



I wasn't saying you were wrong I just disagree to an extent. As far as the stock SB goes TQ isn't the ultimate factor. Its dangerously high spikes in cylinder pressures which comes from detonation. With a good tune things can be kept together pretty well. Each motor is different and yes there is a certain safe limit for TQ on the stock bottom end but I don't think its automatically 425TQ or 15* of timing.



Also 8's and 9's take different timing.
Also 8's and 9's take different timing.
Yes that is correct, timmay's is an 03 evo. evo 9's seem to only take about 3-5 degrees less then an 8 from my experiences.

I wasn't saying you were wrong I just disagree to an extent. As far as the stock SB goes TQ isn't the ultimate factor. Its dangerously high spikes in cylinder pressures which comes from detonation. With a good tune things can be kept together pretty well. Each motor is different and yes there is a certain safe limit for TQ on the stock bottom end but I don't think its automatically 425TQ or 15* of timing.
Couldn't have said it better myself Every car is going to be different, some evo's can take some timing while others cannot. It's all about how the car is setup. Just gotta tune each car to what it likes, and tuning via MBT too.

Last edited by evodude32; Jun 15, 2010 at 04:46 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 PM.