Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Tobz built BR 2.3 FP black e85= Awesome trq!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #31  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
That's one bad mother.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 07:22 PM
  #32  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Looks nice dude! Killer tq! Congrats!

Mikey
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #33  
EVODreams's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Not to complain but that video seemed like a 300-400 hp pull. Sure was lack luster for something that had some serious power. I am confused?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 08:31 PM
  #34  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by EVODreams
Not to complain but that video seemed like a 300-400 hp pull. Sure was lack luster for something that had some serious power. I am confused?
strapped down very tight most likely. thats how it should look!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 09:47 PM
  #35  
italianevo88's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: south chicago IL
Originally Posted by FQ4OO
awesome setup! Almost 40psi is mad!
hell yeah it is
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 10:38 PM
  #36  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Lets not forget this is 5000+ Ft above sea level. Great work tobz! You da man.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 01:26 AM
  #37  
tobz's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Denver, Colorado
Originally Posted by EVODreams
Not to complain but that video seemed like a 300-400 hp pull. Sure was lack luster for something that had some serious power. I am confused?
It seems like that because the power comes on so fast and pulls so strong the whole pull, but on the road its totally different.

Maybe we can get some in car video shots.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 05:19 AM
  #38  
Sicboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Boulder colorado
Originally Posted by tobz
It seems like that because the power comes on so fast and pulls so strong the whole pull, but on the road its totally different.

Maybe we can get some in car video shots.

I'm down for some in car video shots
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 06:35 AM
  #39  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Lets not forget this is 5000+ Ft above sea level. Great work tobz! You da man.
What is the correction factor? At high elevations the CF is way off on a turbo car. I usually see 2x the correction that is realistic at high altitude. If it is uncorrected then that is awesome.

Congrats.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 06:47 AM
  #40  
EVODreams's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
I guess I should restate it looks so smooth and that is why it didn't seem as powerful. Something with that much torque I would think would look like it was going to leap off of the dyno. I didn't mean my comment as a negative. Damn def tone text on a screen.lol
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 08:02 AM
  #41  
Timmay81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
Originally Posted by batty200
What is the correction factor? At high elevations the CF is way off on a turbo car. I usually see 2x the correction that is realistic at high altitude. If it is uncorrected then that is awesome.

Congrats.
i would think that those numbers are with no correction factor
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 10:47 AM
  #42  
tobz's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Denver, Colorado
CF was 1.20. We are in Denver.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #43  
Timmay81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
what were uncorrected numbers? Makes me wonder how much more my setup is able to do, im on the stock 2.0 making 550 on about 30lbs, id have to check the correction factor as we are 4500 feet, i know my uncorrected numbers were just over 500


edit- i also had a 1.20 correction using superflow
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #44  
tobz's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Denver, Colorado
take 20% off
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #45  
Timmay81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
superflow has a few different readings

DJpwer(dyno jet readings) im at 550
STP power is 520 with a 1.206
SAE is about 500 with a 1.15
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:23 AM.