Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

05 Evo- ported IX on E85 438Tq/417Whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 10:46 PM
  #1  
ViscoS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Madison, AL
05 Evo- ported IX on E85 438Tq/417Whp

The thread title lies.
Updated dyno after TB boost leak fix (thanks MIL SPEC)and BOV change





Uploaded with ImageShack.us

412tq/403whp.
Retuned for larger DP (2.75->3in) and from RRE HFC to Gruppe-S test pipe.
438/417
TB shaft seal fix and Forge RS(9 clicks)
450/443


AEM Intake, IX turbo hotside hand ported and coated, 3in DP, Gruppe-S resonated test pipe, RRE Stealth exhaust, HKS 272s, BC cam gears +1/-1, 3-port BCS, Nisei FMIC, Nisei LICP, RC1000s, Forge RS BOV, load based boost control, light flywheel, light crank pulley, ARP studs, blox mount, beatrush diff bushings, E-85, boost peak to 30 and taper to 24 at redline.

peak torque at 3650, peak whp at 6200. Over 400 lb/ft from 3200 to 5600.

Last edited by ViscoS2000; Aug 24, 2011 at 06:33 PM. Reason: new dyno plot
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 02:03 PM
  #2  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Nice power!

IX turbo + E85 = and
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 10:35 AM
  #3  
ViscoS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Madison, AL
Thanks, she has been a constant work in progress. I love to tinker and DIY.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
fqjdmct9a's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Congrats!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #5  
EvOSean06's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii *****!!
nice numbers e85 is sick
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 10:56 AM
  #6  
zthirtythr33's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
great numbers!
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #7  
SloEvo05's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Yukon, Ok
Great numbers on minimal mods!!! Congrats
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 08:34 AM
  #8  
killerpenguin21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 11
From: Big city, Bright lights
i really wish e85 was more easily available.

nice numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 02:08 PM
  #9  
ViscoS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Madison, AL
Boost leak test showed two leaks: TB shaft seal and BOV
Throttle Body shaft seal replaced with MIL SPEC seals and IX BOV changed to Forge RS
Retuned at Church
New numbers: 450 lbft and 443 Hp
Dyno sheet to follow
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 02:52 AM
  #10  
dtrackstar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 2
From: U.S of A
Just to check: that measures power to the wheels or flywheel?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 12:43 PM
  #11  
YogSaahoth's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 8
From: NY/PA
Those TB leaks rob a ton of power and spool...I also gained back a good bit of both when I fixed my leaking seals
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 03:30 PM
  #12  
4xforce's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: norcal
I'm sure you're making good power but if I were a betting man I would bet that the dyno you are using is reading a bit high considering your mods. I'm sure it's a blast to drive though. On second look at that dyno sheet it looks as though it's estimating flywheel horsepower. Makes sense now.

Last edited by 4xforce; Aug 23, 2011 at 03:32 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #13  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Sorry for the offtopic OP.. looks like a Dynapack to me (measures power at wheel hubs). They read close to Dynojet. 5 years ago I made 340whp on a Dynapack then a few days later made 335whp on a Dynojet with the addition of a test pipe and nothing else changed tune/boost/part wise. I'll share if the OP wants me to.

Nice! Have to love E and the stock turbo!!

Last edited by boostedwrx; Aug 23, 2011 at 05:33 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 07:35 PM
  #14  
4xforce's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: norcal
For comparison sake look at this:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tang-dyno.html

A more well thought out parts lineup and making 360 something on a mustang. Give that 8-10% for a dynojet number and you see what I'm saying. I'm not knocking this dudes results I just don't want him to be misled or misinformed. Of course I could be wrong bit I still think there is something missing to explain these numbers here.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 07:45 PM
  #15  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by 4xforce
For comparison sake look at this:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tang-dyno.html

A more well thought out parts lineup and making 360 something on a mustang. Give that 8-10% for a dynojet number and you see what I'm saying. I'm not knocking this dudes results I just don't want him to be misled or misinformed. Of course I could be wrong bit I still think there is something missing to explain these numbers here.
More like ~13% for BR's Mustang to a DJ. Sorry, didn't mean to make this a dyno comparo thread, that's why it's so impossible to really know what it's making unless it's ran on a... Dynojet. That car in the link you posted is making over 400 on a DJ.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 AM.