My first tune at CBRD with the BBK Full
Sep 22, 2010, 02:20 PM
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow! I am so so very tempted to go with the full instead of waiting for the B! Waiting to talk to chad to see what he thinks will be right for my setup. I have to run 91 octane
so I will be doing meth and may just do the full to keep the spool. I don't care about drag times, but the car will see dyno time and want to crack at leat 400(dynojet) and put all the V8's in there place
Sorry for the rant, great numbers sir, I can't wait to be part of the CBRD family
so I will be doing meth and may just do the full to keep the spool. I don't care about drag times, but the car will see dyno time and want to crack at leat 400(dynojet) and put all the V8's in there place Sorry for the rant, great numbers sir, I can't wait to be part of the CBRD family
Sep 22, 2010, 08:13 PM
#20
Whoa. You made 389 and 337 at 24.9 psi. I made 376 and 344 at 27.9 psi on the same dyno with almost exactly the same mods.
I don't mean to hijack your thread and I apologize if that's what I am doing, but I'm seriously scratching my head about this. Why less power with more boost? Could it be down to temperature/humidity? Chad? Anyone?
Here is my graph for comparison.
I don't mean to hijack your thread and I apologize if that's what I am doing, but I'm seriously scratching my head about this. Why less power with more boost? Could it be down to temperature/humidity? Chad? Anyone?
Here is my graph for comparison.
Sep 23, 2010, 07:17 AM
#23
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (65)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Oxford, Pa
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blitz, You made great numbers. It was a good day to dyno weather wise and part selection was key in my build. I'm very very happy with the car but I know I will be pressured by the evom crowd into doing more mods lol
Sep 23, 2010, 10:09 AM
#25
Hey Chad,
Do you like the Kelford 272's more than the Cossie M2's on a IX with a full? From other graphs I have seen it didn't look like a super huge difference. The highest power BBK full here on the GST dyno has been the guy that ran the 280/276 Kelfords and made 400whp on 91. Wondering if you have tested a car with that combo?
Do you like the Kelford 272's more than the Cossie M2's on a IX with a full? From other graphs I have seen it didn't look like a super huge difference. The highest power BBK full here on the GST dyno has been the guy that ran the 280/276 Kelfords and made 400whp on 91. Wondering if you have tested a car with that combo?
Sep 23, 2010, 10:17 AM
#26
Hey Chad,
Do you like the Kelford 272's more than the Cossie M2's on a IX with a full? From other graphs I have seen it didn't look like a super huge difference. The highest power BBK full here on the GST dyno has been the guy that ran the 280/276 Kelfords and made 400whp on 91. Wondering if you have tested a car with that combo?
Do you like the Kelford 272's more than the Cossie M2's on a IX with a full? From other graphs I have seen it didn't look like a super huge difference. The highest power BBK full here on the GST dyno has been the guy that ran the 280/276 Kelfords and made 400whp on 91. Wondering if you have tested a car with that combo?
rarely do i know what combos are in them, but they always rip.
cb
Sep 23, 2010, 11:47 AM
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lancaster, PA.
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whoa. You made 389 and 337 at 24.9 psi. I made 376 and 344 at 27.9 psi on the same dyno with almost exactly the same mods.
I don't mean to hijack your thread and I apologize if that's what I am doing, but I'm seriously scratching my head about this. Why less power with more boost? Could it be down to temperature/humidity? Chad? Anyone?
I don't mean to hijack your thread and I apologize if that's what I am doing, but I'm seriously scratching my head about this. Why less power with more boost? Could it be down to temperature/humidity? Chad? Anyone?
Great #'s for both of you guys.
Sep 23, 2010, 02:05 PM
#29
Whoa. You made 389 and 337 at 24.9 psi. I made 376 and 344 at 27.9 psi on the same dyno with almost exactly the same mods.
I don't mean to hijack your thread and I apologize if that's what I am doing, but I'm seriously scratching my head about this. Why less power with more boost? Could it be down to temperature/humidity? Chad? Anyone?
I don't mean to hijack your thread and I apologize if that's what I am doing, but I'm seriously scratching my head about this. Why less power with more boost? Could it be down to temperature/humidity? Chad? Anyone?
