Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

540hp FP Black Stock Motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 04:58 PM
  #16  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
nice work Petey!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:03 PM
  #17  
mitsael's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Wichita ,KS
hey what is the the list mod for this car and type of gas ???? i am thinking about going with fp black when i come back from the desert
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #18  
milford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: nj/ny/pa
Originally Posted by mitsael
hey what is the the list mod for this car and type of gas ???? i am thinking about going with fp black when i come back from the desert
the mods are clearly stated. fp black and such on ethanol
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:12 PM
  #19  
lillev23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
great power guys. Should be a beast at the track
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #20  
mrdevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Ct
What kind of torque could you have made?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #21  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by mrdevo
What kind of torque could you have made?
over 500 pretty easily with e85.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #22  
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Jersey
Originally Posted by evodood
This thread brings to mind




For lots of reasons
Please, do enlighten me what you are getting at
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #23  
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Jersey
Originally Posted by dyezak
I hate when people scale a dyno graph differently for tq and hp...
And I hate when people post mustang graphs with a filter (smoothing) value of more then 6, but you don't see me complaining about it


Thanks for the comments.. The baseline numbers on the graph were good for 10.5's give or take a pound or two of boost.. Seeing the gains we picked up on the upper rev range it will be interesting to see what it is capable of.. Like I said before 64 lb/min

This is one of our sponsored cars, as well as a freind of mine, hopefully this power will be put to work to get the 10.5 down to something closer to the single digit range

Edit: boost plot also posted in first post.

Last edited by PeteyTurbo@KHC; Oct 19, 2010 at 07:55 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #24  
EvolutionVIIIrs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Union County, NJ
nice work. Any chance of seeing this beast run at the Shootout this Saturday?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 12:45 AM
  #25  
white_evo27's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NJ
what kind of numbers would you have expected if this was run on 93 pump only? and what boost would you be running on 93?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #26  
evodood's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: cali
Originally Posted by PeteyTurbo@KHC
Please, do enlighten me what you are getting at
Well you know how the robot is known for the catch phrases "Danger, danger Will Robinson." and "Does not compute." ? That's what I meant.

1. Your running 33 psi on a stock block. This seems way high for a stock block.
2. Does your Mustang dyno read like a Dynojet? Cause those numbers seem way too high for a Mustang.
2.5 If it doesn't read high and that really is 540/420 then man are you trying to kill that motor. Way too agressive for a stock block
3. E85 is E85 cause it's 85% alcohol (that where the 85 comes from) so how you you have E85 that is 77% alcohol?

These things make me cautious about the quality of data your posting. (Ergo the Robot comment)

Last edited by evodood; Oct 20, 2010 at 09:51 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #27  
chu's Avatar
chu
Evolved Member
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 2
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by evodood
Well you know how the robot is known for the catch phrases "Danger, danger Will Robinson." and "Does not compute." ? That's what I meant.

1. Your running 33 psi on a stock block. This seems way high for a stock block.
2. Does your Mustang dyno read like a Dynojet? Cause those numbers seem way too high for a Mustang.
2.5 If it doesn't read high and that really is 540/420 then man are you trying to kill that motor. Way too agressive for a stock block
3. E85 is E85 cause it's 85% alcohol (that where the 85 comes from) so how you you have E85 that is 77% alcohol?

These things make me cautious about the quality of data your posting. (Ergo the Robot comment)
1. He must feel safe running the car at 33psi to be running it.
2. Does running 10.5s with slightly less power mean anything? 508hp vs 540hp. Yes, on the same dyno
2.5. Read #1. Also, have you looked at the "fastest stock turbo" list lately? There are alot of ppl making huge power on the stock block.
3. You must know nothing of E-85.

What's there to be skeptical about? Timeslip tells it all.

Last edited by chu; Oct 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #28  
evodood's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: cali
Originally Posted by chu
Originally Posted by evodood
Originally Posted by PeteyTurbo@KHC
Originally Posted by evodood
This thread brings to mind




For lots of reasons
Please, do enlighten me what you are getting at
Well you know how the robot is known for the catch phrases "Danger, danger Will Robinson." and "Does not compute." ? That's what I meant.

1. Your running 33 psi on a stock block. This seems way high for a stock block.
2. Does your Mustang dyno read like a Dynojet? Cause those numbers seem way too high for a Mustang.
2.5 If it doesn't read high and that really is 540/420 then man are you trying to kill that motor. Way too agressive for a stock block
3. E85 is E85 cause it's 85% alcohol (that where the 85 comes from) so how you you have E85 that is 77% alcohol?

These things make me cautious about the quality of data your posting. (Ergo the Robot comment)
1. He must feel safe running the car at 33psi to be running it.
2. Does running 10.5s with slightly less power mean anything? 508hp vs 540hp. Yes, on the same dyno
2.5. Read #1. Also, have you looked at the "fastest stock turbo" list lately? There are alot of ppl making huge power on the stock block.
3. You must know nothing of E-85.

What's there to be skeptical about? Timeslip tells it all.
I'm glad these comments were directed at you.

Please let the man respond for himself.

Last edited by evodood; Oct 20, 2010 at 11:21 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #29  
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Jersey
Originally Posted by evodood
Well you know how the robot is known for the catch phrases "Danger, danger Will Robinson." and "Does not compute." ? That's what I meant.

1. Your running 33 psi on a stock block. This seems way high for a stock block.
2. Does your Mustang dyno read like a Dynojet? Cause those numbers seem way too high for a Mustang.
2.5 If it doesn't read high and that really is 540/420 then man are you trying to kill that motor. Way too agressive for a stock block
3. E85 is E85 cause it's 85% alcohol (that where the 85 comes from) so how you you have E85 that is 77% alcohol?

These things make me cautious about the quality of data your posting. (Ergo the Robot comment)
I was not aware of the danger will robinson robot unfortunately, good one..

I will be as friendly as possible and answer your questions as it looks like you may not know as much about data plots and how to spot graphs that read artificially high..

1. Is that a question or statement?
2. No, thanks for the compliment.
2.5 No, but thanks for your input.
3. I test ethanol content in the lab where I work, I am guessing you don't know how E85 mixtures with gasoline change during the course of the year..

If anyone else has concerns of of these numbers please feel free to ask. I am VERY familliar with many different types of mustang dynos as well as the various software versions and I know how to actually spot artificially high numbers on a graph, and this is not one of them. Lets just leave it at that and carry on like grown ups..Anyone that knows anything about how dynos work will also be able to see this. I welcome any vendor in here to debate the graph in regards to the numbers being spat out by this dyno, I am NOT one of those people..

Last edited by PeteyTurbo@KHC; Oct 20, 2010 at 11:39 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #30  
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Jersey
Originally Posted by evodood


Yes, you are correct it is typical of this board for people to answer for others.

Please stay out of this conversation and stop taking this thread off topic as my comments were not originally directed to you.
Chu would know how this dyno reads, he made 187 hp here on the stock tune with bolt-on's!!!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 AM.