Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

E85 Results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:05 PM
  #1  
jtbell86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: cheyenne, wy
E85 Results!

so the results are in after the clutch install and E85 tune, 382 whp and 430 tq! Sorry for the horrible pictures I just cant seem to get a good cell phone pic. Anyway, current mods are:

Turbo back
New FMIC and piping
cai
manual boost controller
fuel rail
880cc injectors
fuel pump
and a few others

anywho thanks to Tobz at Tobz performance tuning for a great job on the tune and clutch!





Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:29 PM
  #2  
fqjdmct9a's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
congrats! are you running cams?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:39 PM
  #3  
joshesh's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Soquel, CA
how much boost? that is crazy high torque
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #4  
jtbell86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: cheyenne, wy
no cams yet, that was at 27psi on a conservative tune. maybe dial it up for better numbers after cams and a few other things
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:59 PM
  #5  
fqjdmct9a's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
oh ok I just thought you had cams since on your mod list you put a few others. Really good number specially without cams! the torque is crazy!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #6  
dude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, NM
At higher altitude it takes an awful lot of WGDC to achieve full spool when compared with sea level. Then once the turbo reaches full boost it starts to quickly run towards the outside of the efficiency island of the compressor map. This is why you see the torque spike very high and then taper off rather quickly, gotta love mile high tuning.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:50 PM
  #7  
4xforce's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: norcal
I am super skeptical about your torque. Something is amiss. What's your IDC's on 880's? What other mods? This is a conservative tune? I think there is something your are not telling us.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:57 PM
  #8  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by 4xforce
I am super skeptical about your torque. Something is amiss. What's your IDC's on 880's? What other mods? This is a conservative tune? I think there is something your are not telling us.
its a mustang with i believe 1.6-1.7 CF which makes it read like a dynojet. its not conservative. i dont know why he would think that.. 27psi is not conservative on stock turbo a mile above sea level

regardless it looks very fun.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:08 PM
  #9  
Ian0611's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 5
From: IL
That torque definitely looks like it make driving a lot of fun! Maybe it's just me but I'm surpirsed you're running E85 on 880 injectors. I always thought the minimum was 1000cc even on a stock turbo? But hey if it's working, kudos to you!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #10  
4xforce's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: norcal
Originally Posted by tscompusa
its a mustang with i believe 1.6-1.7 CF which makes it read like a dynojet. its not conservative. i dont know why he would think that.. 27psi is not conservative on stock turbo a mile above sea level

regardless it looks very fun.
I still have a tough time believing 430 ft lbs on what appears to be a stock turbo at elevation with apparently minimal mods especially without cams. I hope to be proven wrong but it seems a bit high for the mods.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:15 PM
  #11  
3gEclipseTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: ma
Unless he has a stroker/2.4l I call bs on the tq, unless its spiking like 36psi.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:20 PM
  #12  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by 4xforce
I still have a tough time believing 430 ft lbs on what appears to be a stock turbo at elevation with apparently minimal mods especially without cams. I hope to be proven wrong but it seems a bit high for the mods.
Well if you take the correction out it's actually 355 whp / 399 wtq so a bit more rooted in reality.

It's too bad Tobz still doesn't list the CF on his mustang prints...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #13  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by 3gEclipseTurbo
Unless he has a stroker/2.4l I call bs on the tq, unless its spiking like 36psi.
this is the same dyno that showed a fp black almost 700wtq not sure you seen that one or not.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 05:26 AM
  #14  
jtbell86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: cheyenne, wy
Originally Posted by 4xforce
I still have a tough time believing 430 ft lbs on what appears to be a stock turbo at elevation with apparently minimal mods especially without cams. I hope to be proven wrong but it seems a bit high for the mods.

I bought the car used from a dealership and what I was told (true or not) was that the only mods were what I could see....IE exhaust fmic, etc. Tobz said he believes the car may have HKS cams, but I am not sure so I didnt want to go around saying that the car had cams because I'm not sure.

Regardless of if the numbers are believed or not I can assure you that it feels like the numbers are accurate. I honestly almost sh*t myself getting onto the highway after getting her back....It is quite the torque monster
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 05:36 AM
  #15  
4xforce's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: norcal
Originally Posted by jtbell86
I bought the car used from a dealership and what I was told (true or not) was that the only mods were what I could see....IE exhaust fmic, etc. Tobz said he believes the car may have HKS cams, but I am not sure so I didnt want to go around saying that the car had cams because I'm not sure.

Regardless of if the numbers are believed or not I can assure you that it feels like the numbers are accurate. I honestly almost sh*t myself getting onto the highway after getting her back....It is quite the torque monster
I may be a skeptic but congrats on getting it tuned and being happy with it. I guess with the correction factor as Brian mentioned it's at least in the neighborhood of what's possible.

Last edited by 4xforce; Feb 22, 2011 at 05:41 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:12 AM.