Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

SharkBit Evo Is Back !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 08:51 PM
  #16  
GGevo921's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car looks great, i remember this car when it was at ICS way back when. But if i can read that correctly looks like 750hp? Not to bad, looking forward to the 40 psi tune! btw i had a hard time with the pictures untill i was told where to go. Go to photobucket.com and create an account upload your pics there and then copy them to your thread here and you will have giant size pictures that everyone can see. Good luck with the build.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #17  
alqubaisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by GGevo921
Car looks great, i remember this car when it was at ICS way back when. But if i can read that correctly looks like 750hp? Not to bad, looking forward to the 40 psi tune! btw i had a hard time with the pictures untill i was told where to go. Go to photobucket.com and create an account upload your pics there and then copy them to your thread here and you will have giant size pictures that everyone can see. Good luck with the build.
Yup on 6262 I will .. Cant wait too but Colorado winter is already here which sucks Ill try to upload them on Photobucket and thnks broo !
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 08:58 PM
  #18  
GGevo921's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
^No problem. Impressive for sure on that turbo, what are the goals for the car? Doing any racing?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 08:59 PM
  #19  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Just remember Tobz mustang runs 1.2 correction factor.

So in non fantasy land it's actually 630whp/482wtq

Car is obviously fast from the videos.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #20  
EvoDom's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Joisey Shore
Originally Posted by razorlab
Just remember Tobz mustang runs 1.2 correction factor.

So in non fantasy land it's actually 630whp/482wtq

Car is obviously fast from the videos.
Now that looks more realistic. I was going to say 750awhp on 36psi on a 6262

Still sick car, good numbers
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 09:03 PM
  #21  
GGevo921's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by razorlab
Just remember Tobz mustang runs 1.2 correction factor.

So in non fantasy land it's actually 630whp/482wtq

Car is obviously fast from the videos.
LOL non fantasy land

Didnt get to see the videos, but either way 630hp is still fast! But that turbo has got a lot left in it!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 05:12 PM
  #22  
alqubaisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by GGevo921
LOL non fantasy land

Didnt get to see the videos, but either way 630hp is still fast! But that turbo has got a lot left in it!
yah uncorrected but it alot here in Colorado 1 mile high city :P and Compairing my car to sea level its sounds the same but beating a hayabusa and 1000cc bike is alot like its comparing 850Whp+ cars so i dont think so 630whp evo will beat a 1000cc or hayabusa

but yah its sucks here High elevation
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 05:15 PM
  #23  
alqubaisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by EvoDom
Now that looks more realistic. I was going to say 750awhp on 36psi on a 6262

Still sick car, good numbers
yup thats corrected uncorrected 630 on mustang dyno which is around 700 in dynojet
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 07:31 PM
  #24  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by alqubaisi
yah uncorrected but it alot here in Colorado 1 mile high city :P and Compairing my car to sea level its sounds the same but beating a hayabusa and 1000cc bike is alot like its comparing 850Whp+ cars so i dont think so 630whp evo will beat a 1000cc or hayabusa

but yah its sucks here High elevation
Thats because NA bikes don't make the same power up here and loss even more then turbocharged cars.

I've been 600's on stock turbo and e85.

Uncorrected numbers are still great so its hard to complain.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #25  
GGevo921's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by alqubaisi
yah uncorrected but it alot here in Colorado 1 mile high city :P and Compairing my car to sea level its sounds the same but beating a hayabusa and 1000cc bike is alot like its comparing 850Whp+ cars so i dont think so 630whp evo will beat a 1000cc or hayabusa

but yah its sucks here High elevation
No disrespect was intended. i just thought it was a funny comment about the dyno. And to make the power in the mile high city is amazing. Great numbers. Like i said cant wait to see the 40psi numbers.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 08:08 PM
  #26  
B.J.@ToxicFab's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
Car looks great man! Good to see someone rocking a Force-Fed Head!! I vote throw a 6766 turbo on this bad boy & run 40 psi! Looking forward to more updates, good luck!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 08:15 PM
  #27  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by razorlab
Just remember Tobz mustang runs 1.2 correction factor.

So in non fantasy land it's actually 630whp/482wtq

Car is obviously fast from the videos.
+1000
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 09:24 PM
  #28  
alqubaisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by GGevo921
No disrespect was intended. i just thought it was a funny comment about the dyno. And to make the power in the mile high city is amazing. Great numbers. Like i said cant wait to see the 40psi numbers.
^_^ its fine man but its good to make it clear Yah me too
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 09:30 PM
  #29  
alqubaisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by B.J.@ToxicFab
Car looks great man! Good to see someone rocking a Force-Fed Head!! I vote throw a 6766 turbo on this bad boy & run 40 psi! Looking forward to more updates, good luck!
Thankss Maan .. The Head Rockss .. And I really Want to see it on 6766 that will be just insane here

THanks again
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 09:36 PM
  #30  
alqubaisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Thats because NA bikes don't make the same power up here and loss even more then turbocharged cars.

I've been 600's on stock turbo and e85.

Uncorrected numbers are still great so its hard to complain.
Since U are in colorado ^_^ U knw whts 630 uncorrected on mustangs dyno lol and If they loose to power we loose but less . remmber that turbocharged or superchared loose Boost too and boost is Power and with the 1000cc Repsol when it was STOCK we raced an 850whp Zo6 here in denver and he bearly beat it and with the mods the repsol maybe gained 9 to 10 whp which is ALOT ON BIKES and I own a 600cc which U cannot compare to 1000
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 PM.