My Experience with the Difference of Road Tunes vs Dyno
That's true but I think that's only part of it. You, me, and everybody else knows you can put the same car on 5 different dynos and you'll be lucky if they're within 20whp of eachother, and that would be using the same type of dyno. Start throwing Mustang vs. Dynojet numbers in there and well... you know how that turns out.
One thing I've noticed in my own experience is the change of Afr in the tune of Dyno vs road. This may only be in my case but I tuned my other vehicle via Dyno at 11.5 Afr but in real time down the road in similar conditions its consistently 11.1-.2 along with a few froeda vehicles on a dyno showing similar results again this may be my specific tune but my log road tune in the Evo is dead on Afr since it was tuned or real time road conditions. I agree a Dyno is a more controlled environment for consistent numbers and can be a great way tp dial in a car with repetitive conditions but I've never been a huge number guy I just like the track results
One thing I've noticed in my own experience is the change of Afr in the tune of Dyno vs road. This may only be in my case but I tuned my other vehicle via Dyno at 11.5 Afr but in real time down the road in similar conditions its consistently 11.1-.2 along with a few froeda vehicles on a dyno showing similar results again this may be my specific tune but my log road tune in the Evo is dead on Afr since it was tuned or real time road conditions. I agree a Dyno is a more controlled environment for consistent numbers and can be a great way tp dial in a car with repetitive conditions but I've never been a huge number guy I just like the track results 

I wish more people would understand how a mustang dyno or the powerdyne software worked. If they did, it would be understood the the OP's discrepany in loading would be due to dyno setup or operator error..The dyno is not to blame here. Mustang dyno's are perfectly capable of matching road conditions 100% even down to the windspeed, live inertia,rolling and wind resistance, hell even driving down a hill. Everyone has they're own opinion, this one just happens to be alittle off base in it generalizations.
The mustang data posted is useless and corrected. The test report will tell more of the story if not all of it since it has more data.
The mustang data posted is useless and corrected. The test report will tell more of the story if not all of it since it has more data.
It was a mustang Dyno. It was my lightning truck I've never dynoed my Evo. But it seemed to be a consistent thing from my friends who have tuned there. Idl what the deal is to be honest
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
a datalog acquired on a dyno will not correctly generate a representative whp/tq curve for two reasons: 1) the effective mass of the rollers is typically not set to the mass of the vehicle. 2) there is no wind resistance on the dyno. wind resistance is non-trivial for a 3rd gear pull. off the top of my head, i think it takes about 25 whp at 80 mph. all the road dyno programs estimate the additional power needed to cut through the air.
with that said, i've caclulated whp/tq curves from my dyno datalogs at English Racing and found pretty good concurrence. its purely coincidental though.
with that said, i've caclulated whp/tq curves from my dyno datalogs at English Racing and found pretty good concurrence. its purely coincidental though.
a datalog acquired on a dyno will not correctly generate a representative whp/tq curve for two reasons: 1) the effective mass of the rollers is typically not set to the mass of the vehicle. 2) there is no wind resistance on the dyno. wind resistance is non-trivial for a 3rd gear pull. off the top of my head, i think it takes about 25 whp at 80 mph. all the road dyno programs estimate the additional power needed to cut through the air.
with that said, i've caclulated whp/tq curves from my dyno datalogs at English Racing and found pretty good concurrence. its purely coincidental though.
with that said, i've caclulated whp/tq curves from my dyno datalogs at English Racing and found pretty good concurrence. its purely coincidental though.
1. The effective mass of the rollers (inertia) Can no doubt match the vehicle, having it setup correctly I cannot speak for.
2. Wind resistance IS in fact compensated for in mustang powerdyne software by EPA default values and 3rd party measurements or frontal areas included in the vehicle PDF sheet which is available for aditional cost. You can also do the measurements yourself and calculate the values, I have a nifty spreadsheet for just that.
I have to disagree.
1. The effective mass of the rollers (inertia) Can no doubt match the vehicle, having it setup correctly I cannot speak for.
2. Wind resistance IS in fact compensated for in mustang powerdyne software by EPA default values and 3rd party measurements or frontal areas included in the vehicle PDF sheet which is available for aditional cost. You can also do the measurements yourself and calculate the values, I have a nifty spreadsheet for just that.
1. The effective mass of the rollers (inertia) Can no doubt match the vehicle, having it setup correctly I cannot speak for.
2. Wind resistance IS in fact compensated for in mustang powerdyne software by EPA default values and 3rd party measurements or frontal areas included in the vehicle PDF sheet which is available for aditional cost. You can also do the measurements yourself and calculate the values, I have a nifty spreadsheet for just that.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I have to disagree.
1. The effective mass of the rollers (inertia) Can no doubt match the vehicle, having it setup correctly I cannot speak for.
2. Wind resistance IS in fact compensated for in mustang powerdyne software by EPA default values and 3rd party measurements or frontal areas included in the vehicle PDF sheet which is available for aditional cost. You can also do the measurements yourself and calculate the values, I have a nifty spreadsheet for just that.
1. The effective mass of the rollers (inertia) Can no doubt match the vehicle, having it setup correctly I cannot speak for.
2. Wind resistance IS in fact compensated for in mustang powerdyne software by EPA default values and 3rd party measurements or frontal areas included in the vehicle PDF sheet which is available for aditional cost. You can also do the measurements yourself and calculate the values, I have a nifty spreadsheet for just that.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Here's a video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha2QqxVBAL0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha2QqxVBAL0
I like the idea of a car being tuned in the exact environment of which it will be ran in. Street cars on the street, and dyno queens on the dyno.
I do believe a MD can be setup to simulate road conditions. One of the problems is that the fans used on the dyno will never produce the volume of air the front of your car sees going down the road.
I do believe a MD can be setup to simulate road conditions. One of the problems is that the fans used on the dyno will never produce the volume of air the front of your car sees going down the road.
I disagree with most of peteyturbo's posts, no point to argue though, in this thread... I think all tunes should be touched up on the street or track if first dyno tuned. Saying for one you can replicate airflow on the street on the dyno is just not possible and it's more about tuning the cells u enter on the street, vs numbers you can influence by a bunch of dyno settings(like wind resistance). That is just missing the point mr pturbo.
Dyno's have their place, but to think a dyno can replicate every condition is....just wrong. It's also ludacris to think people at these shops have time to play with the dyno for every car, please..
Dyno's have their place, but to think a dyno can replicate every condition is....just wrong. It's also ludacris to think people at these shops have time to play with the dyno for every car, please..
What a pleasant surprise of awesome! Everything I said was wrong and you are correct!
I disagree with most of peteyturbo's posts, no point to argue though, in this thread... I think all tunes should be touched up on the street or track if first dyno tuned. Saying for one you can replicate airflow on the street on the dyno is just not possible and it's more about tuning the cells u enter on the street, vs numbers you can influence by a bunch of dyno settings(like wind resistance). That is just missing the point mr pturbo.
Dyno's have their place, but to think a dyno can replicate every condition is....just wrong. It's also ludacris to think people at these shops have time to play with the dyno for every car, please..
Dyno's have their place, but to think a dyno can replicate every condition is....just wrong. It's also ludacris to think people at these shops have time to play with the dyno for every car, please..






