Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Big FMIC bad idea with stock turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 04:55 AM
  #106  
matt55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: NC
http://www.diamondstarmotorsport.com...o8-bolt-in.jpg

Not nice end tanks IMO , think the buschur will work better for ya DSMOTORSPORTS
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 07:44 AM
  #107  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by trinydex
you also have to take into consideration larger turbos... you need more flow for bigger turbos.
Correct. No one EVER said anything on this thread about a larger fmic not being effective with a turbo upgrade. And a fmic upgrade still is not 100% conclusive to how much gain there is to be had on the stock turbo.

Im just putting my data in for one example. I didn't see any gain on the dragstrip with a Spearco brand IC. Hopefully BRs kit will be better designed than spearco's and show a gain. BUT the big thing in my mind is that noone's FMIC is going to be a drastic gain over the stock ic. It's not like were going from a 4" x 6" DSM sidemount where you gain 30-40hp from an intercooler. Were seeing 10-15hp average at best. Same cost though.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 07:45 AM
  #108  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
matt55,

I am not argueing but my opinion of those end tanks are the opposite of yours. They are too small and not directional, pretty poor design if you ask me.

How much is that Spearco kit?

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:08 AM
  #109  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
I saw a Buschur IC on a customer's car at Dyno4mance, and it was very nice. I don't feel you could go wrong with either that unit or the AMS.

Still, even with the lower IC pipe and the AMS FMIC, I barely picked up 3whp. In my application, it still made no sense to have an IC upgrade with the 16G for power.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:18 AM
  #110  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
matt55,

I am not argueing but my opinion of those end tanks are the opposite of yours. They are too small and not directional, pretty poor design if you ask me.

How much is that Spearco kit?

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Big bucks Dave, hence why Im getting stuff from you guys now. The cost on the spearco is about $200 bucks more than your standard fmic.

I didn't like the spearco one either, and my limited testing showed it performed worse than the stock ic temperature wise with the same boost pressure. I also saw no gain in mph at the dragstrip on a colder day with the same AEM map.

Last edited by DSMotorsport; Nov 18, 2004 at 08:36 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:22 AM
  #111  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by Noize
I saw a Buschur IC on a customer's car at Dyno4mance, and it was very nice. I don't feel you could go wrong with either that unit or the AMS.

Still, even with the lower IC pipe and the AMS FMIC, I barely picked up 3whp. In my application, it still made no sense to have an IC upgrade with the 16G for power.
Well 3whp is still better than the stock ic. So the AMS FMIC and pipe did make an improvement over the stock IC and pipe.

I just see it that in your case, your money might have been better spent on camshafts.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #112  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Oh yeah... that spearco shown on my site....
That was designed, built, and marketed BY SPEARCO. It's not my design or anything, it's spearco's "off the shelf" Evo8 core. Uses the stock pipes.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #113  
matt55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
matt55,

I am not argueing but my opinion of those end tanks are the opposite of yours. They are too small and not directional, pretty poor design if you ask me.

How much is that Spearco kit?

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Re-read i said "NOT NICE" , btw i ordered mine from you (Buschur) on tue of this week , cant wait
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #114  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by DSMotorsport
Well 3whp is still better than the stock ic. So the AMS FMIC and pipe did make an improvement over the stock IC and pipe.

I just see it that in your case, your money might have been better spent on camshafts.
Got it after the cams, exhaust, everything else pretty much. My car's power is about equal to your Evo (but not your Talon).
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:27 AM
  #115  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Talking

Originally Posted by Noize
Got it after the cams, exhaust, everything else pretty much. My car's power is about equal to your Evo (but not your Talon).
Ahh just noticed DD type dyno. Say no more.

ok..well I guess your in the land of diminishing returns that that stage of mods. Seems to me once you do exhaust, cams, fuel control, clutch, boost controll there isn't any parts that give drastic power gains.

FMIC is like $650-$800 for somewhere between 0-15whp
pipes are likely even less of a power gain for a few hundred bucks

Turbokit is atleast $2300..I want to see if possibly the turbo upgrade is feasable before the intercooler. Want to know if with the stock IC and Cams what kind of power and drag mph gain I can get from the BR440.

once the turbo is on...then Ill reinstall the BR FMIC and do the cams.

Last edited by DSMotorsport; Nov 18, 2004 at 09:30 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 08:44 AM
  #116  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Interesting thread. I dont have an EVO8 but do have an EVO1. The cooler on the EVO1 was even smaller than the factory EVO8. And the piping was like they tried to make it as long as possible. I bought an upgraded EVO8 cooler from AMS. I was very impressed with the design of the cooler and was looking forward to upgrade day. I think I shortened the intercooler piping by five feet. With adding the AMS cooler and the shorter and better flowing intercooler pipes I was hoping to feel a nice little gain in pull. To my disappointment and utter shock, the car did not pull as hard with the new setup. This is with the stock EVOIII-16g turbo, 3 inch exhaust running in the 15-18psi range. Turbo responce was also not as snappy.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #117  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
uhm... you got an evo 8 upgraded intercooler? that means it's a big one... bigger one than stock evo 8. depending on their design it might be more restrictive (lots of the ic kits are but everyone just cares about size. so with a larger size and more restriction you're filling up more ic. if you're keeping your stock turbo and not looking to go big you should try a smaller ic cuz you need to match your ic to your turbo application. biggie ics are only needed for turbos larger than stock, or try a more free flowing one, that might not get you the intake temps desired but it will give you more flow and quicker boost. i'm sure you don't wanna hear this but try the greddy unit, although buschur also claims to have a well disnged flowing unit. and remember it's not just about pressure drop, pressure drop is due to increase in size and intercooler restrictiveness and you don't know which one is contributing how much in each kit.

Last edited by trinydex; Nov 25, 2004 at 01:13 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #118  
lil'evil_evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,424
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Originally Posted by Turboholic
i think for stock turbo with pump gas, stock FMIC is pretty good setup, but piping upgrade will have hugh difference,
I agree. I plan to upgrade the piping first and then do a new Buschur or AMS fmic.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #119  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
The Reasosn why the BR FMIC actually nets WHP with the stock turbo is it actually replaces the Lower IC pipe, which is TERRIBLE on the Evo 8, its an instant 10WHP easilly.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 06:22 PM
  #120  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
...so are you saying the standard Buschur intercooler does not net hp?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 PM.