K&N drop in filter suppose to be best filter under 400whp?
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
The stock air box is an excelent unit but it is designed to accomidate a large range of priorities, eg. sound deadening, water protection, filtering and cost considerations
Most of the widley used aftermarket intakes, e.g. HKS RS, Buschur and APS all change the manner in which the MAF sensor reads the air flow and result in tuning variations
However, on these well made units the distortion is BOTH consistant and repeatable. Hence, once the changes are noted and measured, they are uniform from car to car using the same intake with the same mods.
I like to say that each air intake has its own air flow "signature"
I disagree with those trying to say that the well known aftermarket intakes will create a uneven or distorted mass air flow reading with turbulence - this is NOT the case
With proper tuning to compensate for the intake's air flow "signature" a aftermarket will make more power than the stock air box in every case
IMHO - the reason why many tuners may not recoemend or tune for intakes is that with through the mail or base tuning you have to create a whole set of maps for every different kind of intake which is very time comsuming
I offer unique tunes for all the major intakes
Here is a A - B comparision of the HKS RS Intake kit vs the stock air box and K & N drop in on the same car - same mods - both tuned for flat 11.1 / 1 a/f ratio
The gains from the aftermarket intake come up on the top end after 5200

Most of the widley used aftermarket intakes, e.g. HKS RS, Buschur and APS all change the manner in which the MAF sensor reads the air flow and result in tuning variations
However, on these well made units the distortion is BOTH consistant and repeatable. Hence, once the changes are noted and measured, they are uniform from car to car using the same intake with the same mods.
I like to say that each air intake has its own air flow "signature"
I disagree with those trying to say that the well known aftermarket intakes will create a uneven or distorted mass air flow reading with turbulence - this is NOT the case
With proper tuning to compensate for the intake's air flow "signature" a aftermarket will make more power than the stock air box in every case
IMHO - the reason why many tuners may not recoemend or tune for intakes is that with through the mail or base tuning you have to create a whole set of maps for every different kind of intake which is very time comsuming
I offer unique tunes for all the major intakes
Here is a A - B comparision of the HKS RS Intake kit vs the stock air box and K & N drop in on the same car - same mods - both tuned for flat 11.1 / 1 a/f ratio
The gains from the aftermarket intake come up on the top end after 5200

This is all well, and good, and "nice for some". However, I've found that the Dynoflash with an intake (which makes great power) does not run as half as smooth as a Dynoflash (or any tune for that matter) without on the cars I've been involved with in daily driving. Maybe the ultra-smooth Works P2 on the OE air box (less over all power) has me spoiled. Damn, it runs well though. The point of my argument is that the intakes DO cause MAF reading inconsistancies... whether a tuner claims to be able to compensate for them or not, I've yet to see ANY tuner show me a system that runs as consistent as an OE box.
For all the narrow minded folks, I'm not bashing any tuner, or system in any way... I'm just relaying personal experience.
Geeze, Ted and I have not agreed in the past, but I'm in the same boat for the most part on this one...
Last edited by Zeus; Nov 29, 2004 at 05:23 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gibby860
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
137
Jan 25, 2020 11:08 PM
FS[MidWest]: Evo 8/9 Perrin Intake, Evo 9 MAF
Ian0611
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
3
Nov 17, 2016 09:15 AM
Depo Racing
EvoX 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
1
Feb 25, 2013 12:23 PM




