Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur Racing dyno thread.....new developments.

Old Dec 9, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #16  
my3000gt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Thanks Dave for this informative post...many can benefit from this!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 01:21 PM
  #17  
wingnut's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Brew City
An 03 ringer? Interesting theory.

In any case, this thread is exactly what I need to know about parts. Actual data consisting of facts and numbers. The more I read about Buschur Racing the more impressed I am. I wonder if any of the JDM manufacturers put up their numbers so candidly. Truth be told I'd rather buy parts with test data available to the general public than some mystical overseas magic part. The only thing to make this better would be a tuner face-off. Get the east coast guys vs. the west coast guys vs. the red states on the same dyno hardware on the same day on the same gas. Break down the results by price, whatever you can get on the car for under $1000, $2000, $5000, etc..

Cheers David, fight the good fight and you'll have customers coming back again and again.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 01:24 PM
  #18  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
All the haters always thought Dave was inflating his figures with the 03 EVO somehow. I think this shows he had a factory freak in the 03.... not a defective car in the 04

Keith

I think o5s make more power stock then 03s on the dynos because of the 10.8housing.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #19  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Eric Lyublinsky
I think o5s make more power stock then 03s on the dynos because of the 10.8housing.
Yup. Less restriction in the exhaust.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #20  
use2vtec's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: Bossier City, LA
Awesome thread. Im subscribed to it. Im real curious as to what its gonna do because I just bought there stage one kit.

Last edited by use2vtec; Dec 9, 2004 at 02:10 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 02:07 PM
  #21  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Thanks for all this information! The cars are certainly different. Sometimes tuners/shops get a bad rep when the real problem is that the customer got a weaksauce car. Interesting stuff, please keep it up!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 02:14 PM
  #22  
badlooser's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 704
Likes: 1
From: west palm beach,Fl
The grass always looks greener on the other side of the fence. Great job thanks for the info.Will keep watching.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #23  
BadazzCR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
subscribe
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #24  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
From what I know - David's RS is an '04 and the variation could be easily explained with normal car to car variance

At Pruven the weakest stock evo was 208 and the strongest 267

Its a lot more interesting for me to see where the car winds up than where it started !

This will be a great journey to follow
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #25  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by DynoFlash

At Pruven the weakest stock evo was 208 and the strongest 267
Wow!! That is one heck of a difference!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #26  
GOKOU's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Noize
Wow!! That is one heck of a difference!

Maybe this explains the monday and friday car theory
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #27  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Noize
Wow!! That is one heck of a difference!
Keep in mind that is over a sample pool of prob 40 totally stock ones - over 1 1/2 year and with varying air temps, humidity and most importantly FUEL

I am still convinced - BTW - that the guy with the 267 whp - which wound up making over 280 with his Dyno Flash must have beeb running race gas - although at the time he adamently denied having anything in the pump but 94 octane

What is very interesting for me is that 95% of the post tuned stock evos make within 10 whp of each other - usually between 255 - 260 on bone stock evos with the flash. Obviously proper tuning and adjustment to match the individual car is some what of a leveling influence on the power outputs.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #28  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by GOKOU
Maybe this explains the monday and friday car theory
IMHO - more of this variance is due to the fuel used and also the COOLANT temps which you run while on the dyno. Evos are very sensitive to coolant temps.

Also - to a lessor degree - we have found on some of the so called "ringer" evos that the wastegate actuator arm is usually adusted a bit tighter and the cars are able to make stronger boost

Timing, a/f and boost are the building blocks which set the power levels. These are the variables which change and which are the root of the whp variance.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #29  
EVIL MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
subscribe
me too
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #30  
modvp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Great test Dave. Thanks for taking the time to perform such a test. I'm not sure if you did a similar test with the 03. If you did, it would be interesting to compare the total HP gained (with airfilter, dp, axel back, boost controller, etc.) between both cars.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 PM.