before and after HKS 272/272..DYNO
Originally Posted by TURBODAWG
Since both runs were uncorrected, if Pruven still has the files then they can print the SAE corrected graphs and number from both pulls. Then you can compare "apples" to "apples". Evotexas is right, the weather and temperature play a huge part. My guess is the total increase in power will run about 20 whp after the cams after the SAE correction.
Brian
Brian
Both runs were masically maxing out his set up
On cars without cams 90 % are right about 300 - 305 to the wheels - one hit 315 I think but most will be between 290 and 305
On cars with cams - the aveage is 320 - 335 whp with some in the high 310's and a few hitting 340
Here we see typical results from my flash and typical differences between cams and no cams
Usually - cams are good for between 20 - 30 whp on evos
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
My thoughts on this are as follows,
Both runs were masically maxing out his set up
On cars without cams 90 % are right about 300 - 305 to the wheels - one hit 315 I think but most will be between 290 and 305
On cars with cams - the aveage is 320 - 335 whp with some in the high 310's and a few hitting 340
Here we see typical results from my flash and typical differences between cams and no cams
Usually - cams are good for between 20 - 30 whp on evos
Both runs were masically maxing out his set up
On cars without cams 90 % are right about 300 - 305 to the wheels - one hit 315 I think but most will be between 290 and 305
On cars with cams - the aveage is 320 - 335 whp with some in the high 310's and a few hitting 340
Here we see typical results from my flash and typical differences between cams and no cams
Usually - cams are good for between 20 - 30 whp on evos
You tuned my car with just a 3" exhaust (no cat), buschur cone filter, and a Hallman MBC and got 310whp/294 torque...and this was back in last winter
Just thought I would post that
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: milfort ct
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
My thoughts on this are as follows,
Both runs were masically maxing out his set up
On cars without cams 90 % are right about 300 - 305 to the wheels - one hit 315 I think but most will be between 290 and 305
On cars with cams - the aveage is 320 - 335 whp with some in the high 310's and a few hitting 340
Here we see typical results from my flash and typical differences between cams and no cams
Usually - cams are good for between 20 - 30 whp on evos
Both runs were masically maxing out his set up
On cars without cams 90 % are right about 300 - 305 to the wheels - one hit 315 I think but most will be between 290 and 305
On cars with cams - the aveage is 320 - 335 whp with some in the high 310's and a few hitting 340
Here we see typical results from my flash and typical differences between cams and no cams
Usually - cams are good for between 20 - 30 whp on evos
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: milfort ct
Al you should set up your next 272 customer to do 5 runs(tuned for stock), swap cams on the dyno, and then do 5 more runs(tuned for 272). that would truthfully give you an idea of the whp gains.
I would guess the 330WHP is about right. I was at 305 AWHP on a mustang dyno which would put me around 330 or so as well. The sad thing was that I couldnt get anything tuned for anything leaner than 10.6-10.8 or it would knock. crap.
There is potential for a very good discussion here, and Tampa Turbo stands to be the benefactor. Unfortunately, I will be away in Europe for the next week. Perhaps when I return...
Last edited by Ted B; Dec 23, 2004 at 04:02 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Faust
Evo How To Requests / Questions / Tips
76
Nov 6, 2018 06:47 PM
DC2toEVO8
Evo Show / Shine
19
Apr 30, 2008 05:13 AM
TopLevelPerformance
For Sale - Wheels / Tires
3
Nov 7, 2007 03:46 PM
