Replace flywheel or not?
Originally Posted by ACTman
You can't always believe what's in the funny papers. Turbo (and other magazines) are out to sell magazines. I have read some pretty rediculous things in magazines.
Ill be purchasing an ACT clutch at the end of the summer when funds are available but I will be using the stock flywheel resurfaced... however, if ACT would come out with a damn chromoly one that'd be a nice alternative to a 9lb aluminum one...
I have to chime in here. At 11k I replaced my clutch set with ACT and f/w with a Fidanza The reason for this is I got the labor for free. I had lots of disk thickness left but I did not like the look of the f/w. There were thin blue streaks in it. The stock f/w is light and it takes mass to absorb heat so this was not surprising. These facts mean heat on the disk. The pressure plate wasn't discolored but did show some crazing.
I went to Fidanza to gain a replacable friction surface to lower the cost of subsequent replacement and I would have had to pay $319 and tax for a stocker. The difference in weight between the Fidanza and the stock unit are negligible, particularly when you consider where in the rotating mass the reduction resides. Although aluminum will dissapate heat faster than iron the transfer rate to the aluminum form the friction surface may negate the adavantage.
If you resurface the stocker you will expose yourself to a couple of factors that put you at increased risk for warpage. The first factor is lower mass but htis is negligible but the second is relieving stresses in the metal (grain is random in a casting) which might well bring about warpage. ACT is speaking not to run up costs to you but to help you be more staisfied with their products. Is it worth the gamble to ignore their advice? You decide, it's your money.
I went to Fidanza to gain a replacable friction surface to lower the cost of subsequent replacement and I would have had to pay $319 and tax for a stocker. The difference in weight between the Fidanza and the stock unit are negligible, particularly when you consider where in the rotating mass the reduction resides. Although aluminum will dissapate heat faster than iron the transfer rate to the aluminum form the friction surface may negate the adavantage.
If you resurface the stocker you will expose yourself to a couple of factors that put you at increased risk for warpage. The first factor is lower mass but htis is negligible but the second is relieving stresses in the metal (grain is random in a casting) which might well bring about warpage. ACT is speaking not to run up costs to you but to help you be more staisfied with their products. Is it worth the gamble to ignore their advice? You decide, it's your money.
Last edited by WildRice; Jun 5, 2005 at 09:25 AM.
Originally Posted by blitz118
Dirk,
Was your opinion on the EVO stock flywheel? I heard is forged and not cast like the DSM flywheels, which were known to crack. I recently purchased your clutch and bought a new EVO stock flywheel to be on the safe side. Do you see the EVO stock flywheels having the same problems as the DSM ones?
Was your opinion on the EVO stock flywheel? I heard is forged and not cast like the DSM flywheels, which were known to crack. I recently purchased your clutch and bought a new EVO stock flywheel to be on the safe side. Do you see the EVO stock flywheels having the same problems as the DSM ones?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Piro Fyre
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
3
May 6, 2009 02:26 PM




