GT35R Turbo?
Jun 14, 2005, 11:28 PM
#46
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: VEGAS
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GregGSC
GT40R with an AEM and a two step and let the big dawg eat!
Jun 15, 2005, 01:20 AM
#48
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: san gabriel valley
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is the GT35R good for running on a 2.0L and used for a track car 91 octane(road course) or should i go with the 3071 or 3076? i have the same problem deciding. i really want teh 3071 but on a fairly stock car running 91 i wont get 400 and thats my goal and i want to keep close to stock spool. i thought the gt35r was a straight away turbo not good for track. is that true? thanks in advance
Jan 18, 2008, 02:44 AM
#51
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry to bump an old thread, but has anyone tested the 3 housings back to back on a dyno?
Im running the 1.06 and it's lazy as hell, just want to get an idea how much power i will lose and how much midrange i will gain going to either the 0.8 or 0.6.
Im running the 1.06 and it's lazy as hell, just want to get an idea how much power i will lose and how much midrange i will gain going to either the 0.8 or 0.6.
Jan 19, 2008, 04:15 AM
#55
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC via Puerto Rico
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've played with all 3. the most fun is the .63. the 1. is a beast on the top end but you wont like it from light to light. I recomend yhe .63 with the .70 compressor housing also ported compressor exhaust with anti surge. youll have fun.
