Changing only (1) cam - pro's/con's???
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Changing only (1) cam - pro's/con's???
Is there any benefit in just changing out one cam?
i.e.:
1) stock intake cam/ 264 or 272 or 280 exhaust cam
2) stock exhaust cam/ 264 or 272 or 280 intake cam
Also, would doing this require a fuel pump upgrade?
Has anyone done just the one cam change?
Thanks in advance...
i.e.:
1) stock intake cam/ 264 or 272 or 280 exhaust cam
2) stock exhaust cam/ 264 or 272 or 280 intake cam
Also, would doing this require a fuel pump upgrade?
Has anyone done just the one cam change?
Thanks in advance...
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Labor and Tuning are free...
Anyone??? Is this possible - pro's/con's? I'm looking to retain the stock fuel pump - not to max out the stock injectors - keep boost no higher than 21 psi (spikes) and to increase exhaust gas velocity...
Anyone??? Is this possible - pro's/con's? I'm looking to retain the stock fuel pump - not to max out the stock injectors - keep boost no higher than 21 psi (spikes) and to increase exhaust gas velocity...
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
Fuel Pump aside, I'm most interested about getting info on only changing 1 cam - in my case just the exhaust side cam...
If you are wanting to change only the exhaust cam go to a 264 but honestly I think you would get better resutls going to a 264 intake cam and keeping the stock exhaust cam. This is just my .02 but I think it would work out best. Fuel pump not needed.
Anything bigger than a 264 in on the stock exhaust cam will probably not benifit you much but I could be wrong I have wondered the same thing myself before. As well as a 280 intake with a 272 exhaust might be the best of both world combo.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by GTVEVO
If you are wanting to change only the exhaust cam go to a 264 but honestly I think you would get better resutls going to a 264 intake cam and keeping the stock exhaust cam. This is just my .02 but I think it would work out best. Fuel pump not needed.
Anything bigger than a 264 in on the stock exhaust cam will probably not benifit you much but I could be wrong I have wondered the same thing myself before. As well as a 280 intake with a 272 exhaust might be the best of both world combo.
Anything bigger than a 264 in on the stock exhaust cam will probably not benifit you much but I could be wrong I have wondered the same thing myself before. As well as a 280 intake with a 272 exhaust might be the best of both world combo.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
My goal is to:
1) retain the stock fuel pump
2) increase torque as opposed to hp
3) prevent "idel lope"
4) etc. ...
I'll be glad to play the guinea pig - but I need to know if the 264in (or) the 264ex cam will increase torque.
Cam gurus, chime in...
1) retain the stock fuel pump
2) increase torque as opposed to hp
3) prevent "idel lope"
4) etc. ...
I'll be glad to play the guinea pig - but I need to know if the 264in (or) the 264ex cam will increase torque.
Cam gurus, chime in...
i dont remember the thread, but someone a long while back claimed that scca style rally drivers prefered to only change 1 cam!
Unfortunately I dont remeber which 1.
Unfortunately I dont remeber which 1.
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
So 264 intake cam and stock exhaust cam... Would this result in a tq increase or hp invrease?
Hopefully somone who has tested this can chime in. I haven't tested it so I can't say to how much it would increase and what the exact difference would be.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Did some quick reading and I believe that the overall consensus is that to increase torque you have to change out the "intake" cam. Doing so will essentially allow the engine to "breathe" better and to make more power.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Cheaper indeed. What if it turns out that the intake cam is the only cam that really improves tq/hp numbers - kind of like the lower v/s upper intercooler piping misconception (where the upper pipe is for show and the lower pipe is for go). Would'nt that leave a couple feathers ruffled


