Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Is 23lbs of boost safe for me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2005, 08:26 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Stinkapuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by david350Z03
I was considering running 24lbs of boost on some 104 Octane tomorrow. What do you guys think? I need some advice. Am I running too much boost? Will my wastegate and stock BOV be able to handle 23 or 24lbs of boost? Thanks.

david
24lbs on 104 is fine. It would be even better if you could take out some fuel.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 08:48 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
without wastegate line modification, none of these guys are holding 23psi above 5500....

and no, 113 is high for pump gas and stock turbo.....it can be done, but its HIGHLY unlikely.

Ive done just about every bolt on imaginable....and still only hit about 111 on pump gas.
I thought people dyno'd 330-350 all the time with cams on pump gas. That's good for 113-115mph. I'm pretty sure I could hit 110mph (currently at 108) with a full exhaust (w/TP) on my mods, then 112-113 if I tossed in cams. What did you do to hit 117 if you only hit 111 on pump gas? I wouldn't expect a 6mph increase from just race gas. What am I missing? I see the alky kit in your sig, but I thought that was a recent addition...
Old Jul 27, 2005, 08:53 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That was on c16 and 27psi falling to 22. You can't run even close to that on 93 octane....this was also with a minor timing advance. Actually, 350whp is close to the top of the spectrum for a cammed pump gas car.....of course, we are talking about 03-04 cars....the 05 and MR are a tad higher because of the better flowing turbo.

I am running basically the 117mph map on 93 now with the alky....toned down the boost a bit, because its really not safe to run that much boost for more than 1/4 mile at a time with some cool down.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 08:57 AM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
That was on c16 and 27psi falling to 22. You can't run even close to that on 93 octane....this was also with a minor timing advance. Actually, 350whp is close to the top of the spectrum for a cammed pump gas car.....of course, we are talking about 03-04 cars....the 05 and MR are a tad higher because of the better flowing turbo.

I am running basically the 117mph map on 93 now with the alky....toned down the boost a bit, because its really not safe to run that much boost for more than 1/4 mile at a time with some cool down.
Yes, that all makes sense, but 111mph is only indicative of 310-320whp, so I think there's plenty of people who can hit 113mph on pump gas w/cams. My point, though, was to show that they are not running as well as they think when they push 23psi on pump gas on a daily basis, especially in the heat.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 09:04 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
111 is 310-320 whp? by what calculations? you know we have a 3400lb car right?

wit 295 whp on a DD dyno i trapped 109.01 with a 1.70 60' time. thats over 320whp on a dynojet(what i assume you are going by) and that is a pretty low short time(increases trap).
Old Jul 27, 2005, 09:06 AM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Stinkapuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
111 is 310-320 whp? by what calculations? you know we have a 3400lb car right?

wit 295 whp on a DD dyno i trapped 109.01 with a 1.70 60' time. thats over 320whp on a dynojet(what i assume you are going by) and that is a pretty low short time(increases trap).
Warrtalon is dead on with the trap speeds and dynojet whp.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 09:20 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
111 is 310-320 whp? by what calculations? you know we have a 3400lb car right?

wit 295 whp on a DD dyno i trapped 109.01 with a 1.70 60' time. thats over 320whp on a dynojet(what i assume you are going by) and that is a pretty low short time(increases trap).
Yeah, I'm basing it on a Dynojet. I run 107-108 with my 282whp Dynojet reading. I ran 111 on the same setup with some 104 mixed in and some self-tuning in the same weather conditions as when I dyno'd, so I estimate that to be around 310-320whp (320 because I may have hit 112 if not for the 4th gear limitation). I also base it off lots of others numbers I see on here. Joe Rivera ran 117.5 with his 375whp (Dynojet reading) and most people at 350 run 115mph. For 109mph, I would expect right around 290-300. Yes, DD dynos normally read lower, but it can depend on how it's setup and the ambient temp/humidity. I know you're in Hotlanta, but I don't know what month you dyno'd.

Actually, once you get to short times like that, they can often DECREASE the mph, because you have less time to accelerate. Someone with a 2.0 60' will not see this phenomenon when improving to a 1.80 60', but if you go from a slightly spinning 1.75 to a fully-hooked 1.70 on the same shifting in the same conditions, you would potentially see a LOWER trap with a BETTER ET. This is not always the case, but I've seen it happen. I ran a 12.1 at 110 (old 1G) on a 1.62 60', then ran a 12.1 at 113 on a 1.78 60'. This was at 2 different tracks in the same month...one that hooks like crazy and another that was slick as could be (Rockingham). Again, not the best basis for making a theory, but one to keep in mind regardless.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 09:30 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yes, the increases trap was a typo....i was rushing because i am at work...LOL
Old Jul 27, 2005, 01:22 PM
  #24  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (28)
 
PURE EVIL 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Everywhere, Chicago - Washington DC
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
without wastegate line modification, none of these guys are holding 23psi above 5500....

and no, 113 is high for pump gas and stock turbo.....it can be done, but its HIGHLY unlikely.

Ive done just about every bolt on imaginable....and still only hit about 111 on pump gas.
I guess my car must be a factory freak or my cams and extra fuel helps out a lot cuz i hold 22-23 over 5500!
Old Jul 27, 2005, 01:24 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PURE EVIL 8
I guess my car must be a factory freak or my cams and extra fuel helps out a lot cuz i hold 22-23 over 5500!
Must be, then, because Buschur hasn't been able to do it either...
Old Jul 27, 2005, 01:29 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thats called you using the CRAP stock boost gauge, or an aftermarket boost gauge that is off.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 01:31 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
Thats called you using the CRAP stock boost gauge, or an aftermarket boost gauge that is off.
I don't think he has a stock one as an 03, but I use the stock "crap" boost gauge. It seems to work fine for me, but I haven't done any extensive testing to prove otherwise.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 01:54 PM
  #28  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (28)
 
PURE EVIL 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Everywhere, Chicago - Washington DC
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
Thats called you using the CRAP stock boost gauge, or an aftermarket boost gauge that is off.
lol, crap boost gauge......i didnt know that the defi bf series boost gauge was crap. I dont know if my mods matter at all but i have 680cc injectors, 272's, fuel pump, intake, ams front mount, full turbo back exhaust, safc2 and wideband, a/f 11.4-11.8 at WOT..... and yes i do hold 22-23lbs over 5500, drops off to about 20 1/2psi around 7k. If you still dont believe me, i'll take a video of my boost gauge at wot for you
Old Jul 27, 2005, 02:36 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1.8t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My car SPIKES 23, holds 22.5psi for a bit and has tapered to 20psi by 7200.
Old Jul 27, 2005, 02:49 PM
  #30  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Derekj03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I run 1.59 bar (23psi) on my car and havent had any trouble... When i asked the same question everyone said it was safe for me and maybe to just get some arp headstuds... Must be cuz i have more mods... or they just want me to blow up my car lol


Quick Reply: Is 23lbs of boost safe for me?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:35 AM.