Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Buschur Lower IC Pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #31  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Str8Ryda
Thanks Trinydex,

But what I'm confused about is having it produced by a CNC. The purpose of CNC production is to increase precision and accuracy. There are many other types of mandrel benders that are considered "manual" (still hydraulic machines without the computer control) which can preform equally to produce this pipe.

Basically, once the 1pc CNC production pipe is cut it is no different from one being produced on a manual bender.. from the quality stand point they are almost identical because now there is a person assembling (rotating, cutting, evaluating/determining the length, welding, etc.) the pipe not the machine.

At this point biggest difference between the CNC and manual mandrel bender is the $$$$. Since the CNC's cost alot more than a manual bender the $$$$ get passed along to us.

So where I'm coming from is... if this pipe can not be 1pc CNC... wouldn't it be nicer if we can all save a little $$$$.
Sorry Bro, Don't take this the wrong way, but I think you are backwards here. Have you ever SEEN or WORKED with a mandrel bender? A piece made on an automated bending machine and then cut and welded is SUPERIOR and CHEAPER to a piece bent by hand and then cut and welded.

1 - as YOU said, the CNC is more accurate, so the only point of error is the manual cutting and welding.

2 - both a manually bent and CNC bent piece would need to be cut and welded to acheive the shape of the Buschur part. Mandrel benders have dies for each size of pipe that bends them at certain radii. You can only go so small of radii for a particular size pipe. For example, it is IMPOSSIBLE to bend a 3" pipe at a 180 degree 2.5" radius. The radius needed for the EVO lower IC pipe must be too small to produce as a single solid piece. Therefore, the need for cutting and welding.

3 - To produce 100 identical pieces via CNC bender is MUCH cheaper than the same on a manual bender.

Ring . . . Ring . . That's it. Class over for today.

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #32  
Str8Ryda's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
Sorry Bro, Don't take this the wrong way, but I think you are backwards here. Have you ever SEEN or WORKED with a mandrel bender? A piece made on an automated bending machine and then cut and welded is SUPERIOR and CHEAPER to a piece bent by hand and then cut and welded.

1 - as YOU said, the CNC is more accurate, so the only point of error is the manual cutting and welding.

2 - both a manually bent and CNC bent piece would need to be cut and welded to acheive the shape of the Buschur part. Mandrel benders have dies for each size of pipe that bends them at certain radii. You can only go so small of radii for a particular size pipe. For example, it is IMPOSSIBLE to bend a 3" pipe at a 180 degree 2.5" radius. The radius needed for the EVO lower IC pipe must be too small to produce as a single solid piece. Therefore, the need for cutting and welding.

3 - To produce 100 identical pieces via CNC bender is MUCH cheaper than the same on a manual bender.

Ring . . . Ring . . That's it. Class over for today.

EVOlutionary
Evolutionary,

I think a more appropriate question is Have you every worked one? I don't question the accuracy of a automated bender, when it comes to degree of bend. I do dis-agree with your statement about "manual" being superior. I agree with it being cheaper.

The CNC mandrel bender (for those who don't know) is a Computer Numerical Controlled machine. Short version, basically what you do is plot your coordinates (essentially you are just setting the distance, degree of bend, rotation for basic's). Once these coordinates are set basically you load a pipe and hit the "GO" button. Machine does all the work.

Back to the "manual" bender, those manual machines use many different control systems (dial a bend or digital controllers, and serveral older unit which I hope are retired by now). Which are just as accurate when it comes to "degree of bend" So, what I was trying say is: If you have to cut up a piece that "WAS CNC" then "WHY" would you want to take the accuracy out of it? Why do CNC in the first place when it just costs more $$$$ to own/operate/maintain a machine like that? The extra cost involved with a CNC making a part is eventually going to be passed on to us "the endusers".

Now, regarding your 3" pipe bending at 2.5" radius. Yes, with my experience I would have to say it would take a very experienced opperator with every single advantage, tooling, material, and a machine that is capable of doing the near impossible to pull that one off. As for me personally, no I do not believe with the equipment I've worked with could not have pulled that one off. The tightest bend I've personally produced would have been 1D at about 75-80% of the bend dies capability.

Your point #2 regarding the shape of BR's pipe. Agreed!!! Judging by the looks of it it can not be done without having compound tooling which most people do not have.

Point #3 - In the bending world serveral thousand bends per day would justify the cost of a CNC mandrel bender. 100 just won't cut it.

Evolutionary, I believe we are almost on the same page here. My whole point of bring this up was simply:

Why make it from CNC when it's extremely expensive to produce a small quantity?

If it starts out as a CNC piece, and you end up cutting it... whats the point of paying more for something your going to end up cutting and welding?

Basically, all I'm saying is it will cost me more to buy one if it's CNC, and there is nothing CNC about it other than the bend angle. I don't mind paying CNC prices when I know it has CNC accuracy behind it.

Lastly, Evolutionary, yes I do bend tubing for a living, I work with Stainless, Alumimun, Mild Steel, and was fortunate to have bent Inconel for a minute.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #33  
hueman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
haha

this is getting way too technical
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #34  
marksae's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
It's good info. Keep it comin'!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #35  
timzcat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 4
I think the thing both of them fail to realize is Buschur doesn't bend the pipe he has pipes bent for him by a bender. The bender is probably a smaller shop and only has a CNC bender and since he is going to bend say 100 at once it is to his advantage to just do it on the CNC. Probably not more then a couple of guys in the whole shop.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 11:48 PM
  #36  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
but you all gotta admit... for this piece everyone is payin' primo dollar.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 01:05 AM
  #37  
PnutButterWolf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Nice pipes, but too bad its not aluminum.


FACT - aluminum disspates heat faster than s.s.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 01:12 AM
  #38  
eling99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
would i be able to use this for the arc intercooler???
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #39  
PnutButterWolf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by eling99
would i be able to use this for the arc intercooler???
I doubt it.. but why do you need pipings for ARC intercooler? Don't they come w/ aluminum pipings to go w/ it?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 01:56 AM
  #40  
eling99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by PnutButterWolf
I doubt it.. but why do you need pipings for ARC intercooler? Don't they come w/ aluminum pipings to go w/ it?

do they? i didnt know!!! i thought i would buy some aftermarket intercooler pipes and then up grade to the arc!!!
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 02:26 AM
  #41  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by PnutButterWolf
Nice pipes, but too bad its not aluminum.


FACT - aluminum disspates heat faster than s.s.

But your not trying to dissapete heat from the lower IC pipe, your tying to retain the cool air.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 05:25 AM
  #42  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
either way it is a good piece, and you get what you pay for....good work dosent come cheap.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 05:27 AM
  #43  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
I would get this piece but I am waiting on the lower pipe for the race fmic to be completed...
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #44  
hueman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
Originally Posted by eling99
do they? i didnt know!!! i thought i would buy some aftermarket intercooler pipes and then up grade to the arc!!!
i don't think they come with pipes
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 09:15 PM
  #45  
marksae's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
Originally Posted by gonzo
But your not trying to dissapete heat from the lower IC pipe, your tying to retain the cool air.
Air exiting the turbo is most likely hotter than its' surrounding environment. Air entering the intercooler could use a little help with heat dissipation. So aluminum is more ideal for that application. SS would be a better material choice after the intercooler since you want to prevent heat from being transferred from the engine bay into the intake stream.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:17 AM.