JUN 272 vs Revolver!!! =D

AMS pushes for JUN's
Buschur Racing pushes for Revolvers
(not comparing company's in ANY way ... just saying that they are two of the more respected and renown names on this forum)


oOoOr JUN 264s on relatively stock car =D
since the Revolver should really be more of a race car cam.. maybe the JUN264's are what we should be looking into next =P



p.s.
thanks for all the intense posting from everyone... i've learned a lot
one of my favorite threads yet

 

What I would really want to find out is if the Jun 264's will net more gains than my HKS 272's. I know that with the Revolvers I will get more torque and better spoolup, now what will the Jun 264's can do for my car.

 

and the world may never know cuz no one has the juns or no one has intalled them and lived to tell the tale on the internet. maybe after you buy them and install them you become too cool for the internet.

 

lol

 

ok rich boys start doing these tests for us poor boys

 

Yeh go find someone with major $$$ Monster Sport is making cams too lets test.

 

why not jun 272's??? there the cams i want. i would love to see a comparo with jun 272 & rovlover & other cam company's

 

yeah i know i am told comp cams are awesome then some say they are the worst same with hks as well and jun and tomei now i am done with opinions i want facts.


so people who have gotten comp jun hks revolver and so on post up your after dynos if you have them and let us see.

 

Im really inclined for the Revolvers, just for the added torque and the spoolup characteristics, that could make my 50trim spool up almost like stock Now for the Jun's 264's (272's are way too agressive for my taste, my car is a daily driver) I received an email saying that they are comparable with the HKS 280's but will get better spoolup and net more power.

 

jun 272's more agressive?? then what. revolver??? i thought revolvor would be more agressive since there ''race cams'' i went though the hole page last nite and read every post. and a few people think the revolvers as a posiblility able to be compared to the hks 280's as well.

i think it should be a test with hks 280, jun 272, revolver. seem to be the most talked about cams on this hole thread

 

The HKS cams are at a disadvantage because their ramp profiles are milder than the JUNs, Revolvers, etc. This is why one can use the stock springs with the HKS cams and not with JUNs, etc. More aggressive ramp profiles can benefit power and spool characteristics, but they put too much stress on the factory valvesprings.

 

I know a car here in PR with JUN 272's and the idle on that car is simply jaw dropping, but thats a race only car, Road Racing, but for me as a daily driver and the problem that I have is I have only reflash, so we'll see, Im sure with proper degree both can idle quite good.

 

Ted, the specs for the JUN 264's are not complete, any idea how we can find them? I've tried everywhere.

 

ok i get what your saying ted. so how about jun 272 vs revolver then. how do you think that will come out?

 

that's what i said! =P

i think that would be an AWESOME set of cams to compare