Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Recently Dynoflashed w/ Alky Kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #16  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Did you happen to have Dave print out a graph of ur boost curve/afr etc..?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #17  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
Originally Posted by fuzzychi
Try going to Start->Run

Type in cmd
Press Ok
then type ipconfig /flushdns
Press Enter

And see if you can see the picture.
still nothing. I cant even clink on links that people post up. Like the link to buschurs dyno development page he just posted??
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #18  
fuzzychi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by justchil
Did you happen to have Dave print out a graph of ur boost curve/afr etc..?
No, I didnt have them print that out but I do remember the boost falling off dramatically due to the leaking stock BOV and also my AFRs were like I think around 10.9.
This was done in case the alky failed so that my engine would still a chance, I think also since I had the older alky kit w/ larger nozzle they couldnt get the AFRs leaner because of the larger nozzle.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #19  
Jon H's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Nice man.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #20  
fuzzychi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
I'm not sure if this could be problem? I actually only have the Injen I/C piping and not the full kit which includes the Intake Pipe and Filter.

Could the way I am routing this be the problem?

Here are some pictures of it:


Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #21  
Ultimate CC's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (122)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,876
Likes: 0
From: Peekskill NY
I doubt the UICP has anything to do with it, I bet the stock BOV has a big part. You won't ever know what kind of power the car is truly making till you bring it to the track.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #22  
EVOfunk's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: Bavaria, Germany
Originally Posted by Ultimate CC
Yea stocker doesn't really hold well past 18psi
23psi with stock BOV...no leaks.

Why would Mitsubishi put a BOV that can't hold 18psi when is supposed to hold 20.3psi in stock form? Don't get me wrong, I dont like that cheap plastic BOV and I'll have to ditch it once I get a AI kit, but for now it works just fine.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #23  
Ultimate CC's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (122)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,876
Likes: 0
From: Peekskill NY
There are several members who have tested it and it begins leaking at 18psi, don't ask me why Mitsu did this. Does anyone wonder why the EVO9 now comes with the JDM MR BOV? Just my .02
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #24  
fuzzychi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Yea I also heard of some people have their stock BOV hold fine past 20ps. I'm not one of them I guess lol.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #25  
chmodlf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Does your EVO really weigh 3625? WOW that seems heavy.

That must have been with the driver???
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:36 PM
  #26  
fuzzychi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Hah I dunno, I think thats just what Buschur puts into the dyno to account for the car and the person inside tuning.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #27  
madpacket's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Spanish Fork, UT
Originally Posted by chmodlf
Does your EVO really weigh 3625? WOW that seems heavy.

That must have been with the driver???
Ever since Buschur got the Mustang dyno it has been showing 3625. I think they just transposed the 6 and 2. When I dynoed on a different MD they listed the weight was 3265 which is much closer to the mitsu-claimed weight.

I wonder if more weight in that column makes the resulting hp/tq numbers lower?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #28  
fuzzychi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Yea it might load up the car differently with a different weight? But I think Buschur has been using this weight consistently so the dyno runs have been consistent.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #29  
keviin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Vacaville, Ca.
mustang dynos are heart breakers!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #30  
fuzzychi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kevin
mustang dynos are heart breakers!!!!
Yea a heart breaker for me until I took a test drive after the tune.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM.