Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

HP, timing vs boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #31  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by SlowCar
Hi Dave, i myself am trying to find the limits of timing too. I had a chance to chat with Dynoflash-Al while he was in phx and was told that the stock ecu will not allow/start pulling timing >11 degrees(i'm on stock ecu w/ ecutek flash). I've seen another person on stock ecu + ecutek with 12 - 14 degrees.
I will get retuned in a few days time. My plan is to set boost @26psi, AFR = 12.5, and start cranking up timing till i see it either plateau/knock then back it off 1%. I'm at 11 degrees now@23psi boost.
No one could give me a definite answer and every car having a different knock threshold, i just have to experiment and see how it goes.
I assume you are running C-16 or equivelent?

Where on the curve are you hitting 11 deg of timing? Is that the minimum you are running on your timing curve, and what RPM is that at for you?

Keith
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 07:30 PM
  #32  
SlowCar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Hi Keith, i'm run straight deionized water@17 v/v% water to fuel ratio. 11 degrees at peak tq somewhere around 4000rpm datalogged on a turboxs tuner.


https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/at...chmentid=78807
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 01:23 AM
  #33  
MR's Avatar
MR
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
newbie question...

how do u know how much advanced timing u need for your car? ixit realistic to keep advancing til you hear pinging/detonation than reduce it..taking into consideration of a fixed efficient boost level...
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 02:31 AM
  #34  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
Originally Posted by strikethree
At what point does timing reduction get stupid?

Using totally unrealistic numbers (divisible by ten):

Let's say that through extensive experimentation on a load bearing dyno that I discover my engine makes max power without boost at 100 degrees advanced timing.

Let's say that my turbo will provide 100 PSI max.

When the turbo starts pushing 70 PSI, the engine starts knocking and I pull back timing to compensate. At 80 PSI, I pull back 50 degrees of timing to stop the knock. at 90 PSI, I have to pull back 100 degrees of timing (which leaves me at 0). At the full 100 PSI, I have to go negative 50 degrees of timing to prevent knock.

At what point (percentage) was the timing absurd? Please fill in more appropriate numbers if it helps. I was merely trying to work it out as percentages with easy to use numbers.

strike (Dave)
i think you got the right idea, negative is pretty absurd yeah? hehe. the thing is on most cars you'll see a timing increase with rpm increase... and i think you don't want to see that increase fall... but i'm not quite 100% on that. so the balance is enough boost such that you can't increase it anymore without curbing your increase in timing as rpm goes up?

Originally Posted by MR
newbie question...

how do u know how much advanced timing u need for your car? ixit realistic to keep advancing til you hear pinging/detonation than reduce it..taking into consideration of a fixed efficient boost level...
i do believe this is a legit way of tuning, and of course you can always add fuel or reduce timing slightly for safety margin. altho this method is legit you prolly woudln't wanna fumble yer *** all day like this hahaha which is why experience or familiarity with different cars and their respective boost, timing and fuel curves is well saught after.

Last edited by trinydex; Jan 4, 2006 at 02:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #35  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
If you split it, pls provide the link. Some interesting reading, to say the least.

l8r)
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #36  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Here is the link to the new thread titled "Combustion discussion"

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=177490

Keith
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #37  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Thanks.

l8r)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nj1266
ECU Flash
875
Jan 25, 2026 01:43 AM
98autogstspyder
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
657
Apr 27, 2022 01:48 PM
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
82
Feb 3, 2009 04:22 AM
EVO8_PR
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
46
Sep 23, 2008 07:29 PM
trinydex
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
26
Oct 13, 2007 01:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.