Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Quad turbo... Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #76  
SaabTuner's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Davis, California
Originally Posted by o4whtevors
i saw some one state that 2 1000 cfm turbos would generate 2000 cfm. that statement is not correct. if you sit down and do the math ( not just basic 1+1=2 ) you would see that it does not work that way. in fact if you had 2 1000 cfm turbos doing the same amount of work at 20 psi you would only have about 1500 cfm available to you. the equasion is not lenier due to the resitance you are going to encounter. the same is true in pipe line cfm, two 1/2" pipes are not going to supply as much as one 1" will, infact the two 1/2" will be closer to one 3/4".
wtf? Two 1/2" pipes don't have the same cross-sectional area as a 1" pipe. That's why they won't flow as much. It has nothing to do with the CFM limit of a turbocharger.

Two 1,000 cfm turbos should still be able to flow 2,000 cfm if the engine can reach high enough boost levels and/or RPM to swallow that much air.

Last edited by SaabTuner; Feb 9, 2006 at 07:21 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #77  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by SaabTuner
wtf? Two 1/2" pipes don't have the same cross-sectional area as a 1" pipe. That's why they won't flow as much. It has nothing to do with the CFM limit of a turbocharger.

Two 1,000 cfm turbos should still be able to flow 2,000 cfm if the engine can reach high enough boost levels and/or RPM to swallow that much air.

Who the Fuc k cares!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #78  
my91talontsi's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Freehold, NJ
According to one forum with photos of it it's a Vauxhall head.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #79  
bolsen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
Great to see something new! Wish we had more info!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #80  
x838nwy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok
Originally Posted by hel_if_ino
Who the Fuc k cares!
Man, why did you have to post this? Really. What is it you think this would achieve? SaabTuner and I were pointing out something to another member which in no way offends anybody. So why the attitude? It's this sort of thing that cause threads to spiral to **** fights that end up being closed down.

Anyway, just coming back on topic, does anyone know if Owen dev. have put it on to an actual car, or is it still a project engine. - i can't seem to get to their site right now...
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 11:58 PM
  #81  
stiguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, NY
That looks pretty sweet. I wonder how much power that thing puts down.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #82  
Killboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Robbinsville, NC
Originally Posted by stiguy
That looks pretty sweet. I wonder how much power that thing puts down.
I don't think it would be that impressive in numbers, but what probably would be impressive is WHERE it starts putting the power down. They are so small they wouldn't create a ton of boost, even the write-up that was linked previously says they were trying to see if they could just get above atmospheric pressure. But, they probably would produce boost at about 2000rpm...would be nice for tight mountain roads or autocross style tracks.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 08:43 AM
  #83  
4g63IXMR's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #84  
Bezimo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: milwaukee
What the hell is that .

yikes
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #85  
donmeca2020's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood,florida
what on earth kinda set up is that?>
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #86  
Killboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Robbinsville, NC
Originally Posted by donmeca2020
what on earth kinda set up is that?>
It's a quad turbo setup. See, "quad" means four. (4)
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 02:31 AM
  #87  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
Originally Posted by x838nwy
Un-fu*king-believable.

I seem to recall that the mutiple turbo (per cylinder bank) setup's are attempts to reduce the lag caused by a large turbine (on large turbos) while spinning up. So while you _might_ make less power, you stand a much better chance of getting your power earlier and thus broadening your powerband. As far as I am aware, there's no reason why a single turbo should make more power than multiple turbos. Surely it's just a matter of flow and pressure development. If you have two turbos in parallel developing 20psi each flowing 1000cfm then that should be the same as one turbo at 20psi flowing 2000cfm(?). I'm ignoring a number of things (such as plumbing and dynamic effects) but I think that's pretty much the crux of it.

For V12 or even V16 engines, I guess the 4 turbo setup is probably advantageous cos it simplifies your exhaust manifold design....

I think it can only be a good thing jmartinez1170. You can use the time to learn to use punctuations. [monotone voice]You seem to type like Kimi Raikkonen talks yes. Is it intentional i don't know... [/monotone voice]
there is a reason... that reason is those 4 trubos combined cannot outflow a gt35r. a small turbo comes with a small top end flow and even if it is PER cylinder it does not negate the fact that when the mass needs to be flowed the small turbos will not be able to do it. why? because for one, in order for a turbo to be spooled on one cylinder you need to squish the air significantly from the port, otherwise you'll just increase lag, squishing the air from the port means no top end means no flow means this kit is a loser
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 03:10 AM
  #88  
xballsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: ptown OR
Originally Posted by Killboy
It's a quad turbo setup. See, "quad" means four. (4)
would of never guessed
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 08:56 AM
  #89  
chuntington101's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
this looks great but it will be impractical! its more of an example of the enginering work that owen is capable of! it has been widley pubisized over here inthe uk that this is a one off!

and can you imagine the cost of this kit?????? it would be exspensive!

Chris.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sideck
Evo Show / Shine
10
Jan 20, 2011 10:55 PM
raytrix
Evo X Show / Shine
12
Oct 28, 2010 07:10 PM
AWDTerror
Evo X Show / Shine
48
Oct 29, 2009 06:01 PM
haze1995
Northwest Region
19
Sep 7, 2005 03:48 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35 AM.