Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

GT35R Installed!!! OMG... So Much Fun!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #46  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
its not 100% irrelavant. its all about cylinder pressure, not HP. Just the cylinder pressure needed to make over 525whp on a 35r is about the stock motor limit as far as safety is concerned. 32psi is pretty freakin high for the stock motor, unless the timing is retarded quite a bit, near the edge of EGT temps being too high.
so your saying 32psi on a 3076 or stock turbo is gunna cause the same wear and tear on the motor? sure it might be blowing hot air and burning up some of the life of the turbo...but thats about it.. hp is the name of the game.

Last edited by MikeMAN; Mar 6, 2006 at 10:08 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:30 PM
  #47  
moto17's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
First, sweet numbers man, congrats

Originally Posted by Derek888
glad you like your turbo! I may be wrong but at 32 psi you should be well over 500whp?
Two things: 1) 471 on Mustang dyno is f-ing sick. If im not misinformed, mustang dyno's are consistantly ~18% lower than dynojet on similarly modified cars. That means he's around 555whp for dynojet numbers. 2) he's using the stock MAF, and getting over 400whp on stock maf is saying something in my book, no matter what the mods.

my $.02

congrats again
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #48  
Thugline's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Riverside,CA
I am sure if you got a stand alone with a C-16 "Map" and an "aftermarket Intake manifold" you would hit about 520whp and being that your car was on a "Mustang" dyno that is a pretty damn good #. What RPM does your powerband peak @?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #49  
Thugline's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Riverside,CA
Originally Posted by moto17
First, sweet numbers man, congrats



Two things: 1) 471 on Mustang dyno is f-ing sick. If im not misinformed, mustang dyno's are consistantly ~18% lower than dynojet on similarly modified cars. That means he's around 555whp for dynojet numbers. 2) he's using the stock MAF, and getting over 400whp on stock maf is saying something in my book, no matter what the mods.

my $.02

congrats again
I would never like to put my car on a "Dynojet" because I want to see true #'s and not some "Hyped #'s" that are not acurate. I never believe the #'s off the "Dynojet"!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #50  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
Originally Posted by moto17
First, sweet numbers man, congrats



Two things: 1) 471 on Mustang dyno is f-ing sick. If im not misinformed, mustang dyno's are consistantly ~18% lower than dynojet on similarly modified cars. That means he's around 555whp for dynojet numbers. 2) he's using the stock MAF, and getting over 400whp on stock maf is saying something in my book, no matter what the mods.

my $.02

congrats again
myabe I misread his post... didnt know it was on a MD
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:37 PM
  #51  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by moto17
First, sweet numbers man, congrats



Two things: 1) 471 on Mustang dyno is f-ing sick. If im not misinformed, mustang dyno's are consistantly ~18% lower than dynojet on similarly modified cars. That means he's around 555whp for dynojet numbers. 2) he's using the stock MAF, and getting over 400whp on stock maf is saying something in my book, no matter what the mods.

my $.02

congrats again
Mustang dynos can be 1% lower or up to 20%+ lower. However, we cannot determine how this one reads since we dont know of any baselines or inputs like rolling weight and that crap. However, in a post above TTP said it reads 5% lower so if that holds true, then it would be near 500whp on a DynoJet, which I think is damn impressive for a flash.

I keep getting very tempted to do this too.. the whole GT35R on alc/meth, stock motor. Everytime I thought of making my car 500-600whp territory I think of a fully built motor, standalone and turbo kit, alcy kit and the price is already near 10 grand. Now Im just thinking.. TURBO KIT/acly kit and LETS DANCE! (Of course assuming I get a nice clutch in there!)

Congrats on the numbers, I want to be you lol. Stock turbo is boring me
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #52  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
what kinda clutch is holding this power? and is it streetable?

thx....once again, nice #'s!! i bet that thing is a fawkin ROCKET
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 11:11 PM
  #53  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
I dont think hitting 500whp is a problem for me on the stock motor. Its the drivetrain that Im afraid will break. For me to send my drivetrain to shep racing isnt gonna be cheap at all...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #54  
FahKen Evo!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
You may actually be safer with a GT35R in terms of the Drivetrain. You are losing that big torque spike and power is gradually added and doesn't shock the drivtrain. WHP does not kill a tranny but Torque sure will.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 03:47 AM
  #55  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
I just put my kit on myself, and lag is overated. I have a gt3076 and without the car being tuned I am already considering putting a gt35 on. GUYS LISTEN TO ME VERY CLOSELY, BIG TURBO's ARE THE WAY TO GO. Whether its a Buschur 20g or the almighty AMS gt35r, or anything in between thats the only way to go. I am so upset that I have been on the fence about big turbo's so long. I would never go back to a small or stock turbo, BTW if anyone wants my stock turbo set up for $200.00 PM ME.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 07:53 AM
  #56  
denolloyd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
My scanner is acting up. I took pictures of the Dyno Graph with my phone but they appear to be too large to attach. I'll try my scanner again this evening thwn I get home.

Originally Posted by BigLEVO
jus a little off topic but....what clutch are you running on that car? thanks
Stock Clutch. I Doubt it will last very long...

Originally Posted by RnR Racing
Congrats on getting the kit installed and running well. I am just wondering who you got the kit from? Was it a used kit or from one of our vendors? Curious as I don't recognize your screen name. Hopefully you will be taking it to the track soon.
I purchased a used kit off this site in December for a very reasonable price. I will take the car to the track once I change the clutch.

Originally Posted by SLVRNBLK
The GT35R will ultimately be my set-up one day. Congrats! Bring the car out to the Brandon meet on Wednesday's (Sonic in front of SuperWalmart off of 60). We'd love to check it out.
What time? I'll will try my best to make it!

Originally Posted by sho 'um
Hey man, I was down at CFT when you were there(tall skinny kid). I wish I could have stayed longer to see your runs. Damn good numbers, congrats!! And I am definitely going to get a tuned by John next time, very cool guy, knows his stuff..
Thanks man. Yeah, John knows his stuff. Car feels amazing with only a flash...

Originally Posted by moto17
Two things: 1) 471 on Mustang dyno is f-ing sick. If im not misinformed, mustang dyno's are consistantly ~18% lower than dynojet on similarly modified cars. That means he's around 555whp for dynojet numbers. 2) he's using the stock MAF, and getting over 400whp on stock maf is saying something in my book, no matter what the mods.

my $.02

congrats again..
Thanks

Originally Posted by Thugline
I am sure if you got a stand alone with a C-16 "Map" and an "aftermarket Intake manifold" you would hit about 520whp and being that your car was on a "Mustang" dyno that is a pretty damn good #. What RPM does your powerband peak @? ..
7250..

Originally Posted by WrX Kila
I just put my kit on myself, and lag is overated. I have a gt3076 and without the car being tuned I am already considering putting a gt35 on. GUYS LISTEN TO ME VERY CLOSELY, BIG TURBO's ARE THE WAY TO GO. Whether its a Buschur 20g or the almighty AMS gt35r, or anything in between thats the only way to go. I am so upset that I have been on the fence about big turbo's so long. I would never go back to a small or stock turbo, BTW if anyone wants my stock turbo set up for $200.00 PM ME...
Well Said!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #57  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
stock clutch? your probably not getting an accurate dyno reading because your cant put the power to the wheels?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #58  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
Originally Posted by MikeMAN
so your saying 32psi on a 3076 or stock turbo is gunna cause the same wear and tear on the motor? sure it might be blowing hot air and burning up some of the life of the turbo...but thats about it.. hp is the name of the game.
you tell me, which is gonna kill your motor quicker, which has MUCH higher chance of detonation.....

32psi on stock turbo running 425whp OR 22psi on the 35r running 425whp? all else being equal.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #59  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
you tell me, which is gonna kill your motor quicker, which has MUCH higher chance of detonation.....

32psi on stock turbo running 425whp OR 22psi on the 35r running 425whp? all else being equal.
Hmm good ??? I would say the 32psi on stocker. The bigger turbo will flow air better than the stocker any day of the week. I could be wrong.. someone correct me if I am.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #60  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
you tell me, which is gonna kill your motor quicker, which has MUCH higher chance of detonation.....

32psi on stock turbo running 425whp OR 22psi on the 35r running 425whp? all else being equal.
obviously stock turbo with huge EGTs etc....like i said before, psi BY ITSELF....not PSI in general...its insignificant.....properly intercooled....OVERLY INTERCOOLED or whatever, 32psi on a stock turbo is do-able....
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 PM.