Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Check out my curve, should I switch to alky?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:27 AM
  #16  
matt55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: NC
"20 hp dry shoot thread" =60 hp

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=175339
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #17  
tke_413's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
I believe you and I've also seen that thread. This however has nothing to do with this thread, sorry. Thank you for the info though
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:43 AM
  #18  
Boltz.'s Avatar
Evolved Member
FCOTM Winner
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, IL
^ hes actually using one of those nitrous in a bag kits which are known for having messed up jet sizes. A 20 shot on their system is more like a 40 shot on a normal nitrous system.


Oh and about alchohol, you would prolly only improve torque where it peaks because of higher boost. I'd have a lot of trouble believing that you would make any worthwhile power uptop by switching to alky

Last edited by Boltz.; Mar 15, 2006 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #19  
tke_413's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
K, so it's looking like I would gain minimal hp, but definately gain more torque. I think I might just get the larger cams and gears, install the intercooler and run straight 104 to get my 400WHP...should be good enough for me until getting the TT 50 trim. Thanks for the help guys!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:50 AM
  #20  
FahKen Evo!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boltz.
^ hes actually using one of those nitrous in a bag kits which are known for having messed up jet sizes. A 20 shot on their system is more like a 40 shot on a normal nitrous system.


Oh and about alchohol, you would prolly only improve torque where it peaks because of higher boost. I'd have a lot of trouble believing that you would make any worthwhile power uptop by switching to alky
I say he would pick up atleast 30WHP and 60FP's of torque.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #21  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
what makes you think the power increase wasn't the nitrous going into the intake filter that is directly behind the intercooler?

that is a healthy chart though, extremely good for only 24psi spike. 28psi spike with alky should net you around 400-410whp. thats damn good.

-Jeff-

Originally Posted by tke_413
The top chart is also with the N'tercooler spraying nitrous on the stock intercooler to assist with the cooling. My new race intercooler will hopefully by arriving withing the next couple days and I'll be putting the spraying on that as well. Against what a lot of people say, the intercooler actually does help...my chart went up 25WHP and 5WTQ when spraying. I have easy access to the 104 when I go to the track, but it's like $6-8/gallon.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #22  
Creamo3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by FahKen Evo!
I say he would pick up atleast 30WHP and 60FP's of torque.
No way, not on the stock turbo. He is already reaching the limits at 25 psi and race gas. The only gains that he would probably see is a bigger spike in torque down low due to more boost/timing you are able to run. Other than that the stocker looks to be getting maxed out around the 400whp range (dynojet).
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #23  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Your first graph looks wierd - the HP and TQ did not cross at 5252 RPM. Second one looks good.
Your cams look to run out of steam after about 6600 RPM so I think 272 may help if you like to rev up there.
Yes the alky will help with TQ number a lot (I would guess at least 25 ft.lb over what you have now) if you let it spike a bit higher.
I also think that N'tercooler is a big waste. You can't control the amount being injested through the filter. It DOES happen whether you want to admit it or not.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #24  
FahKen Evo!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Creamo3
No way, not on the stock turbo. He is already reaching the limits at 25 psi and race gas. The only gains that he would probably see is a bigger spike in torque down low due to more boost/timing you are able to run. Other than that the stocker looks to be getting maxed out around the 400whp range (dynojet).
Wait, is his dyno run ON race gas or pump? If it is only on 93 octane, then for certain he will make great gains. On race gas, idk then.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #25  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
dyno is on race gas
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #26  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
at that power level the stock turbo is pretty much maxed out..you might see a slight gain in power and tq.

It would be worth it imo for the convenience of not having to mess with a mix or the price of race gas..
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #27  
tke_413's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
Originally Posted by Creamo3
No way, not on the stock turbo. He is already reaching the limits at 25 psi and race gas. The only gains that he would probably see is a bigger spike in torque down low due to more boost/timing you are able to run. Other than that the stocker looks to be getting maxed out around the 400whp range (dynojet).
I figure right now by adding the race intercooler and running straight race gas and the boost up to around 26 psi I should already be at the 400WHP mark....with the 264's. After switching to the 272's and gears....I guess the only left would be the turbo upgrade??!!!?!!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #28  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
yes, if you dump c16 in the tank you aren't gonna gain anything from alky....maybe a TINY bit.

alky is more suited for an application to run daily. as in, you would have that 390-400whp DAILY instead of at the track when you dump in 11 bucks a gallon worht of c16
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #29  
FahKen Evo!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Yeah really, I am sorry I thought that was a pump gas run, not race gas. Sorry. If you run C16, just run water in your Alky kit to keep things cool I guess, you won't need alky.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #30  
tke_413's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
dyno is on race gas
It's on a mix of 93 and 104
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 AM.