Few months ago....I didnt realize. I cruise the vendors sites often enough but not enough to notice that.

 

Those are some weaksauce numbers unless that was on Buschur's dyno.

 

you think this guy is going to spend all that money and not upgrade the turbo comeon

 

I think the OP is on cracks. This list doesn't make sense.

 

i totally agree, unless he's runninc crap cali fuel and like 16psi boost he should be making more power

 

Brup, scammer online?

On this thread sorry but those numbers in my point of view seem too low for all those mods, and whats up with The Cosworth head it comes up ready to rock and roll and you changed the springs? Anyways good luck with the car.

Honestly thats like $10,000 or maybe more in parts

 

Very low numbers, you want to max out the stock turbo? Go trap 127MPH.

 

Stock turbo
stock intercooler
stock injectors
stock engine with cams

at 19 psi 331whp 297wtq Mustang Dyno

 

seriously I have 272 whp and about 290 wtq on just exhaust and a reflash with a drop in and lower incooler pipe.

 

Is this something new ?

I didnt think/know it was 3" .

The pic's of it look like the ebay one .

 

#'s seem low for all those mods. hhmmmm.......

 

you sould make more power. much more

 

While I did miss the AMS intake manifold, this doesnt quite add up. Its like saying that adding cams (thusly adding more air to the engine) reduces power cause the turbo cant keep up. Psi might drop off, but cfm would still be a constant. If anything a bigger plenum with tuned runners should be laggy, but not down on power.

 

WOW, all those mods and little power. Their is DEFINITELY something wrong with your #'s. Also the Cosworth springs can take 10k with no problems. My friend Juan made More power than you on the same dyno with 1/10th of the money you put into your car.

 

The AMS intake manifold is not causing the low power. It works really well on the stock turbo. I hit 370 horsepower on AMS's dyno with it! 93 oct./meth 25psi