With similar mods, I pulled 322awhp and 331awtq on a mustang. That's normal, right? Or were mine too low, also?

 

Btw, I have these mods Downpipe, Test pipe, Cat Back, Walboro 255, Hallman MBC @ 25 PSI, EcuTek. Intake

I don't have the "just added list", but I do have LICP, which was added AFTER the tune. My torque was pretty good, I was happy. My tuner says the MIVEC has to kick in when the turbo goes to spool, or something. It's not easy to make a good mivec map, he said. But you'll know if you have a good one when you have a lot of torque. Being that 9s are very new it's likely that their isn't really much experimentation with the MIVEC and bigger turbo's. Which probably contributes to your mediocre numbers.

 

Normal.


EVOlutionary

 

At first I thought that looked way low, but then I realized those were graphs of straight pump gas. On pump gas I think that is a very appropriate HP and TQ. Once you start adding bigger turbos and raising your top end powerband HP goes up much faster than TQ.

As others said, on race gas or pump+methanol you will be impressed by the numbers and performance.

EVOlutionary

 

Thought 1st thru 3rd were nearly identical. If it was a 6 speed and the dyno was done in 4th, the mph would read at least 100 to equal 7000 rpms and 110mph for almost 8000rpms. It looks like the dyno was done in 3rd gear based on the mph readings on the graph, so it almost looks as if the turbo is falling off towards redline.

 

Those numbers are bang on, on pump gas I made the same hp but 360 tq, on race I made 490 480.

Scorke

 

Doesnt seem to be falling that bad at all to be honest IMO. I hate how Turbotrix uses the damn MPH instead of RPM. Just use RPM god damn it LOL.

 

AMS just did one.477whp with 50 Trim,JUN 264 cam,reflashed stock ECU with consertive tune.

 

I should have said "on straight pump". Also, that guy has an exhaust cam. I was basically trying to show that an IX with upgraded turbo but without cams wont make the power of an VIII with cams and upgraded turbo.