Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

1st MOST POWERFUL 9???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 02:43 PM
  #16  
SKILMATIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: in a jet
bump gotta few pics of the setup
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #17  
Guerillah's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Looks good, time to go to the track! Dyno chart would be cool too...
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #18  
SKILMATIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: in a jet
Originally Posted by Guerillah
Looks good, time to go to the track! Dyno chart would be cool too...
Yes I know I am waiting on alfred from tuning tech to post it up for me. But my stats are in my sig. So there ya go.

Also I got kicked off the track at 1/8 mile qualcomm for going too fast w/ a passenger. Thats right too fast. On a bogged launch on the stock tires with the street map(which is around 380whp on 91oct) I went 7.7 @ 94.8mph. Now the time isnt all that impressive IMHO due to qualcomm being a really shabby track but the trap is.

Last edited by SKILMATIC; Oct 1, 2006 at 03:01 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 03:08 PM
  #19  
KOEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Wow man, cool. The engine bay looks so good, i am impressed.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #20  
SKILMATIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: in a jet
Originally Posted by KOEvo
Wow man, cool. The engine bay looks so good, i am impressed.
Hey thanks bro. Rnr did a great job. I was hesitant at first but they sure impressed me.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #21  
SmokinJoe's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Not bad at all.

I made 416whp, 342wtq at 22.5psi on pump pee. No mods except for the exh cam - so basically like your car.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #22  
SKILMATIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: in a jet
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
Not bad at all.

I made 416whp, 342wtq at 22.5psi on pump pee. No mods except for the exh cam - so basically like your car.
Thanks dude. Your setup will probably see faster spool due to your turbo being ball bearing. But pretty close turbos. However, what kind fo tuning did you do and what was your fuel system like? The cam makes a huge difference I hear for the 9's.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #23  
Deepseadiver's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: GUAM, USA
"The cam makes a huge difference I hear for the 9's."

What have you been hearing? I thought that adding the cam was not much of difference. I could be wrong.

BTW: Nice numbers on the IX, I hope to hit 400+ with the new 20G-LT turbo and alky when it becomes available next month.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #24  
SKILMATIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: in a jet
Originally Posted by Deepseadiver
"The cam makes a huge difference I hear for the 9's."

What have you been hearing? I thought that adding the cam was not much of difference. I could be wrong.

BTW: Nice numbers on the IX, I hope to hit 400+ with the new 20G-LT turbo and alky when it becomes available next month.
Well from different sources such as this guy. Cause if we do infact have close to identical setups then by just adding the cam he made a little over 20wheel on pump than I made on the same boost level. Our turbos are very similar the housing differences are within .1-.3. So I know its not just the turbo. However, I think liek you in the realm that one cam is nto conducive to the stock intake came. Cause I would definitely assume there must be some valve overlap with such a setup. Not to mention the only cams out for the 9 I heard were regrinds. This from TT and HKS. No one makes a specific core for the 9. So like I said I dont knwo for fact yet just stating what I heard. I cant conclude yet on factual evidence
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #25  
LancerevoIX2006's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Illinois!
i dont think this is the most powerful one... mine will have a GT4*R so we will see .. being built again by DEVO TUning
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #26  
SKILMATIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: in a jet
Originally Posted by LancerevoIX2006
i dont think this is the most powerful one... mine will have a GT4*R so we will see .. being built again by DEVO TUning
Well I prolly shoulda been more exculsive in the thread title. I wanted to know is this the first 9 that has reached over 500whp on the stock ecu? But thats too much for a title. However, I know there will eventually be much more powerful 9's than mine but at least I was one of the pioneers haha . O btw, be prepared to wait for spooling at around 6500-6800rpms.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #27  
LancerevoIX2006's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Illinois!
Originally Posted by SKILMATIC
Well I prolly shoulda been more exculsive in the thread title. I wanted to know is this the first 9 that has reached over 500whp on the stock ecu? But thats too much for a title. However, I know there will eventually be much more powerful 9's than mine but at least I was one of the pioneers haha . O btw, be prepared to wait for spooling at around 6500-6800rpms.

i had my GT35R pushing 30 PSI on Stock ECU and i kno that was over 500 WHP and full boost by 4000... It was one quik evo and this turbo we think full boost by 6500 =]
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #28  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
I would be worried about a 255LPH and that much whp. I love the RNR manifold, it is the only reason I take that company seriously.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #29  
nicka117's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Had to throw a word in for Alfred at TT--he is absolutely the best! He really took care of me and still does. My car is running perfect.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 05:28 AM
  #30  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
I am a little confused by your thread, how come you state you made 510WHP, but in your signature it says 575WHP?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 PM.