Evo 9 TME Turbo 6 Blade Dyno #'s
Oct 22, 2006, 04:07 PM
#16
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yeah, that's not a Mustang Dyno (sig) and isn't reading like a Mustang Dyno, but the gains are fairly consistent with going from an 8 to a 9 turbo.
The torque curve looks very, VERY strange. Is there something wrong with the spoolup? I would have expected peak torque about 1000 rpm earlier, but it is cool how the WHP curve flatlines instead of dropping off - that's the TME part, I guess.
Hey, are they really using EcuTek, or did you just forget to change that in your sig?
The torque curve looks very, VERY strange. Is there something wrong with the spoolup? I would have expected peak torque about 1000 rpm earlier, but it is cool how the WHP curve flatlines instead of dropping off - that's the TME part, I guess.
Hey, are they really using EcuTek, or did you just forget to change that in your sig?
Yes I am still using ECUTek. I have been using that ever since I got it from Nick at the wonderful Precision Tuning.
Oct 22, 2006, 04:10 PM
#17
I will attempt to have Mike or Corey from AMStuning to chime in for any of your concerns or questions. I am just here for one to share my great experience that I had once again from AMSTuning and to display my dyno tuning results with a Evo 9 20G TME 6 blade.
Last edited by Evo Police; Oct 22, 2006 at 04:12 PM.
Oct 22, 2006, 04:17 PM
#18
Unfortunately, not all Mustang Dynos read the same anyway. Some read really low (Buschur/Gruppe-S), and others read like Dynojets (CFT). You can't compare the numbers between some other Mustang Dyno and this dyno unfortunately, so we don't have any evidence of gains here. It would probably help if you at least showed the previous dynograph, but we can't do an overaly, unfortunately.
So, you stuck with EcuTek, and AMS-T has the EcuTek software to retune it? I'm surprised they would buy EcuTek flashing software so late in the game now that EcuFlash is out and costs nothing to use, whereas the EcuTek software costs $5k or so? Shrug.
Any plans to get to a track to verify anything? For instance, if this Dynomite thing really reads like a Mustang dyno (e.g. Buschur's), then you would trap 120-122, since your Dynojet-equivalent would be 430-440whp. If it reads like a Dynojet, you'll trap 116-117.
So, you stuck with EcuTek, and AMS-T has the EcuTek software to retune it? I'm surprised they would buy EcuTek flashing software so late in the game now that EcuFlash is out and costs nothing to use, whereas the EcuTek software costs $5k or so? Shrug.
Any plans to get to a track to verify anything? For instance, if this Dynomite thing really reads like a Mustang dyno (e.g. Buschur's), then you would trap 120-122, since your Dynojet-equivalent would be 430-440whp. If it reads like a Dynojet, you'll trap 116-117.
Oct 22, 2006, 04:23 PM
#19
Yes I plan to get to the track sometime. Right now I working 6 days a week with this crime emergency we have going on here in the Nations Capital. If I can't make it to a track, I may end up going over to a place lie Mach 5 and see what kind of number I put up over there.
Oh, yea don't quote me on what flashing software amstuning is using, I was asked a series of questions on what the car was previously flashed with and I told them ECUTek.
I pm'ed mike to respond to the thread to answer some questions I don't want to guess at.
Oh, yea don't quote me on what flashing software amstuning is using, I was asked a series of questions on what the car was previously flashed with and I told them ECUTek.
I pm'ed mike to respond to the thread to answer some questions I don't want to guess at.
Oct 22, 2006, 05:34 PM
#20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: local area man
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They do NOT use Ecutek. I asked directly and was told "no" FWIW. I will have the same setup baseline Dynoed on theirs as well as ISP's dynojet by weeks end and will post results...
Oct 22, 2006, 05:50 PM
#24
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not using EcuTek - EcuFlash'ed.
We use Dynomite AWD Dynamometer; as far as the numbers, a 100% stock 9 MR put out roughly 245 whp, a tuned 9 MR with alot of bolt-ons put out 330whp @ 24psi, I consider the numbers fairly well-represented and consistent.
This particular car had a good map to start out with - I touched up the timing and fuel and stabilized boost, it felt great. These particular runs were made from 2000rpm to 7000rpm.
Mike
We use Dynomite AWD Dynamometer; as far as the numbers, a 100% stock 9 MR put out roughly 245 whp, a tuned 9 MR with alot of bolt-ons put out 330whp @ 24psi, I consider the numbers fairly well-represented and consistent.
This particular car had a good map to start out with - I touched up the timing and fuel and stabilized boost, it felt great. These particular runs were made from 2000rpm to 7000rpm.
Mike
Oct 23, 2006, 02:23 AM
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yeah, that's not a Mustang Dyno (sig) and isn't reading like a Mustang Dyno, but the gains are fairly consistent with going from an 8 to a 9 turbo.
The torque curve looks very, VERY strange. Is there something wrong with the spoolup? I would have expected peak torque about 1000 rpm earlier, but it is cool how the WHP curve flatlines instead of dropping off - that's the TME part, I guess.
Hey, are they really using EcuTek, or did you just forget to change that in your sig?
The torque curve looks very, VERY strange. Is there something wrong with the spoolup? I would have expected peak torque about 1000 rpm earlier, but it is cool how the WHP curve flatlines instead of dropping off - that's the TME part, I guess.
Hey, are they really using EcuTek, or did you just forget to change that in your sig?
The dyno doesn't load the car like a Mustang or DD dyno. Thats why your spool is so late.
Shoulda dyno'd in 5th lol
Oct 23, 2006, 06:37 AM
#28
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ONRAILS
The dyno doesn't load the car like a Mustang or DD dyno. Thats why your spool is so late. Shoulda dyno'd in 5th lol
Shoulda dyno'd in 5th lol
Oct 23, 2006, 07:55 AM
#29
Originally Posted by ONRAILS
The dyno doesn't load the car like a Mustang or DD dyno. Thats why your spool is so late. Shoulda dyno'd in 5th lol
Shoulda dyno'd in 5th lol
Oct 23, 2006, 08:07 AM
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AMSTuning.com
Correction, this is a twin retarder Eddy Break dyno with load capability. However, on these runs the dyno was not being loaded and was used in inertia only mode.