carbonetics carbon twin plate failure + pics
Not even close. The picture shows no excessive heat whatsoever. The condition of the floater shows the clutch was babied.
__________________
__________________
Not saying the clutch is crap. I think this floater cracking is an extremely rare event. The pic is clear enough to show there was no exessive heat in the floater. Its not hard to tell when metal surfaces get hot in a clutch. I would send the clucth to ATS and ask them to fix for free. I bet they would if you ask nicely.
It is going to be difficult to know if it got hot since the floaters are phosphate coated (not sure if that is the exact coating they use). They are not going to show the pretty colors if they were overheated like bare steel does. Carbon doesn't tend to tear up the surfaces like cerametallic materials do when overheated.
So, you spoke to Exedy and OS Giken (in Japanese I presume), DB and Tilton and this is what they told you? I don't mean to flame, but you can't be serious. Tilton told you their carbon clutches are for drag racing only? Uhh, I don't think so. If anything, their clutches (and most carbon clutches) were most specifically for road racing, and not really meant for drag racing.
Actually I was at PRI in Orlando in December and spoke to Exedy, O.S. Giken, and Titon in ENGLISH since we were in AMERICA and that's what we do here. And yes, that's what all three of them recommended. And way back when I bought my Exedy twin cerametallic from DB, he told me something similar, though for different reasons. He said carbon wasn't good for a street application, plus I didn't need a carbon clutch at my power levels.
Maybe the US employees of these companies are all a bunch of ***-clowns, but they all agreed, so I thought maybe they knew something. But I guess they could be wrong. Perhaps they all got together at an ***-clown convention and came up with the same stupid story to tell us Americans so we DON'T but their more expensive products. I must admit, I expected a little more from you since John Shepherd and Brent Rau both run your clutches.
Thanks for being a condescending pr!ck. Way to represent your company. 
Actually I was at PRI in Orlando in December and spoke to Exedy, O.S. Giken, and Titon in ENGLISH since we were in AMERICA and that's what we do here. And yes, that's what all three of them recommended. And way back when I bought my Exedy twin cerametallic from DB, he told me something similar, though for different reasons. He said carbon wasn't good for a street application, plus I didn't need a carbon clutch at my power levels.
Maybe the US employees of these companies are all a bunch of ***-clowns, but they all agreed, so I thought maybe they knew something. But I guess they could be wrong. Perhaps they all got together at an ***-clown convention and came up with the same stupid story to tell us Americans so we DON'T but their more expensive products. I must admit, I expected a little more from you since John Shepherd and Brent Rau both run your clutches.
Actually I was at PRI in Orlando in December and spoke to Exedy, O.S. Giken, and Titon in ENGLISH since we were in AMERICA and that's what we do here. And yes, that's what all three of them recommended. And way back when I bought my Exedy twin cerametallic from DB, he told me something similar, though for different reasons. He said carbon wasn't good for a street application, plus I didn't need a carbon clutch at my power levels.
Maybe the US employees of these companies are all a bunch of ***-clowns, but they all agreed, so I thought maybe they knew something. But I guess they could be wrong. Perhaps they all got together at an ***-clown convention and came up with the same stupid story to tell us Americans so we DON'T but their more expensive products. I must admit, I expected a little more from you since John Shepherd and Brent Rau both run your clutches.
Our experience with carbon also doesn't seem to agree with your assessment.
From our own testing on a 9 second Camaro we were able to hold over 600hp with a 240mm single disc carbon on carbon with only 2200lbs of clamp load, hot or cold. In other words the clutch tested about the same clamp load and size and number of discs as the stock EVO, except we were using carbon on carbon and was holding over 600hp. In that particular case the carbon was very aggressive so the coefficient of friction was very high. And the rapid wear that you spoke of wasn't there either. Before using 2200lbs we tried 1650lbs and it slipped like mad. After a couple aborted passes, we heated it up real good and went for broke and the clutch still slipped all the way down the track and of course this cooked the clutch. This would normally destroy a clutch but to our amazement when we took it apart the materials were fine and only worn a few thousanths of an inch. The material definitely gets grabbier hot of course. We verified this during various dyno tests, etc.
If the right carbon material is selected, some of carbon's best traits are that it is light, relatively strong, won't warp, and heat capacity is tremendous. The worst traits are that the coefficient of friction is inconsistent and the cost is insanely high. I don't consider the heat up to be a requirement in most cases as you suggest, with the right material and clamp load. My personal experience is with carbon on carbon so I am not sure about carbon on steel clutches.
IMO the problem that some are finding is that while the carbon performs very good, on carbon on steel designs it out-performs the steel that it is running against. They will probably perform well until you exceed the heat capacity of the steel and the steel warps and tries to transfer material, etc. You are not able to take full advantage of the carbon for it's heat capacity, and also for it's light weight (using steel floaters). This of course is not true with the Tilton which runs carbon against carbon.
Keep in mind that a twin disc carbon/carbon takes five layers of expensive carbon vesus the two layers required for a carbon on steel twin disc. The benefits of carbon against steel is of course cost savings. The other tradeoff that I mentioned is the inconsistent friction. What I mean by that is that you can't really consider it a viable material for a drag racing slipper clutch. In that case you are looking for a material that has a consistent coefficient of friction no matter what (hot or cold for instance), ideally. Being able to tune the static and centrifigal loads to get the perfect amount of slip is not possible if the friction is not consistent. To take that reasoning to an extreme, top fuel and funny car teams buy a production run of about 1000 discs just so they can get the same characteristics on all the part they are expecting to run during the season.
I hope that makes sense to you. I would be glad to share more via email if you are interested. Once again, my humble apologies for coming off like an a$$.
http://carbonetic.net/tech/index.html
If you have any questions or concerns, i would suggest that you call Carbonetic directly. Yasu is quite technical and he might be of assistance.
cheers.
mike @ mynes
i just had one installed on friday so far im breaking it in....i really hope this clutch is not that fragile.....the clutch itself before the install was beautiful ( compared to the clutchmaster stage 4).
I went to the Carbonetics page and read their warranty, or lack thereof. It concerns me that they say there is NO warranty once it is installed. I can't quite understand what their trying to say, but here's a direct quote,
"Once our CARBONETIC Products are installed or used in anyway, there will not be any warranty. If the installation is impossible due to defective or broken parts, the proper parts will be supplied by ACROSS ."
I guess they will replace any broken and/or defective parts? Is it me, or is their grammer throwing me off? If I'm going to pay top dollar for a "top of the line" clutch, someone better be willing to stand behind it, otherwise, why not go with something @ half the cost? Anyone have any answers? I'm supposed to be getting this clutch this week.
"Once our CARBONETIC Products are installed or used in anyway, there will not be any warranty. If the installation is impossible due to defective or broken parts, the proper parts will be supplied by ACROSS ."
I guess they will replace any broken and/or defective parts? Is it me, or is their grammer throwing me off? If I'm going to pay top dollar for a "top of the line" clutch, someone better be willing to stand behind it, otherwise, why not go with something @ half the cost? Anyone have any answers? I'm supposed to be getting this clutch this week.
Last edited by cnoevo8; Jan 21, 2007 at 04:36 PM.
the mod required are to remove the stock throw out bearing and use a toyota bearing with mating peice that holds it to the clutch fork which is reversed. from there, the slave cylinder is flipped over, and the lines going to it with the bleeder are swapped. last, there is a bracket that connects the slave cylinder to the clutch fork which converts it from a pull to a push type clutch(although the slave cylinder really pulls now instead of pushing on the clutch fork).






