Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BOV swap has me confused.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2007, 10:38 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
cfdfireman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maf

Originally Posted by hondafan
because he was mentioning leaking air before mass(which i'm assuming he means mass airflow sensor)and after mass. it doesn't really matter before or after, a leak is still unmetered air escaping.
The whole system is post MAF. Both sides of the BOV unless he's VTA and he won't tell us that.
Old Apr 23, 2007, 03:14 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
hondafan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: york, PA
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cfdfireman1
The whole system is post MAF. Both sides of the BOV unless he's VTA and he won't tell us that.
yes, i understand that. some people run blow through MAFS though, OP didn't tell us.
Old Apr 23, 2007, 04:11 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
scottatyamaha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
Last week I did a little experimenting. I plugged the return line on the greddy s BOV and let the BOV dump to atmosphere. I did this to see what would happen to A/F and power if I temporarily ran BOV to atmosphere while I conduct IC testing. One of the results was you could hear the BOV leak during part throttle spool up. Not a small leak but a very audible one. I couldn't hear any leak at WOT and the A/F seemed to not change at all. Power felt good. Drivabitilty on the other hand was complete crap. Stalling all over the place, very rich during light cruise, etc. I was thinking that at part throttle the pressure in upper IC pipe was greater than in the intake manni. Meaning there was no boost on top of BOV to hold the valve on its seat. This valve has the small inner spring removed, and is set to open only 4-5mm or so. It is very easy to push open with thumb. So I decide to try MR BOV which kills your thumb trying to open it. MR installed recirculating. Instantly I noticed the car felt slower. It also stalled more often and ran a good bit richer. I made this swap right after an alternator change. So I was thinking the ECU has to relearn some fuel trims and I shouldn't jump to conclusions. So I drive it for a few days. Power never seems to return. Today I swap back in the S BOV. Well my butt dyno was not lying. The car is a good bit faster with the S in place. A/F is most of the problem I am sure. A/F with S = 10.8, A/F with MR = 10.3. G-tech g's in 4th gear: MR =.52G, S =.62G. This is with 1.8 bar at redline on both valves. Slight spike to 1.9bar.

Now obviously form the A/F change we can easily deduce one of the valves is leaking under WOT. Question is which one? When you have a boost leak and a MAF it is very easy to see the A/F go rich. This is because metered air in not making to the engine so there is access fuel. But does this same rule apply when recirculating?

But why would you have a leaner AFR with the Greddy valve VTA than the MR valve recirculating? If the Greddy valve is leaking under boost while VTA you should have a richer AFR with that than the MR valve recirculating. I am very confused.
Old Apr 23, 2007, 04:39 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by scottatayamaha
But why would you have a leaner AFR with the Greddy valve VTA than the MR valve recirculating? If the Greddy valve is leaking under boost while VTA you should have a richer AFR with that than the MR valve recirculating. I am very confused.
I only ran the S VTA as a test. Thats when I noticed it leaked at part throttle.

The back to back tests are with both valves recirculating. The quoted a/f ratios and g-tech numbers are for both valves recirculating.
Old Apr 23, 2007, 05:36 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
scottatyamaha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
I only ran the S VTA as a test. Thats when I noticed it leaked at part throttle.

The back to back tests are with both valves recirculating. The quoted a/f ratios and g-tech numbers are for both valves recirculating.

Ok i got ya. I am anxious to hear what happens on this because I cannot think of any good answer as to why you think the greddy valve that leaks makes the car faster than the MR valve that did not leak. You got me on that. Maybe I should sell my MR and get the leaky greddy...lol
Old Apr 25, 2007, 01:39 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
cfdfireman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Breather system

Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
I only ran the S VTA as a test. Thats when I noticed it leaked at part throttle.

The back to back tests are with both valves recirculating. The quoted a/f ratios and g-tech numbers are for both valves recirculating.

Is the system open or as stock?
Old Apr 25, 2007, 02:19 PM
  #22  
Evolving Member
 
4G63DSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In front of a Catia screen
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow!

you can't figure out how to hook up a BOV, or reason out the way one works, but you feel justified questioning buschur's little test with a wind speed meter with some questionable math?

hilarious!
Old Apr 26, 2007, 02:31 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by 4G63DSM
Wow!

you can't figure out how to hook up a BOV, or reason out the way one works, but you feel justified questioning buschur's little test with a wind speed meter with some questionable math?

hilarious!
you must have me confused with someone else. I didn't post in burshurs thread on windspeed. but if I did it would have looked like 240twinturbo post. that was the only intelligent post in that thread.

I dont have a problem hooking up a BOV. Only asked a simple question which I thought was common knowledge but the responses in this thread suggest everyone is clueless as to why I am getting the results I am. The only post attempting to help was TTP post on possible hz disturbance being the cause

I guess you are sore at me because I insulted your lack of intelligence in thermodynamics. So now you have nothing better to do but make useless posts furthur showing us your lack of intelligence. Thanks for you input, or LACK thereof.
Old Apr 26, 2007, 06:20 AM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
PVD04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What intake pipe are you running (MAF to turbo)? If not stock, does the recirc port direct air towards the MAF or towards the turbo (the stock pipe directs air towards the turbo)? With a pipe that directs air towards the turbo or perpendicular to flow, it is even more likely that TTP's explanation is possible. Another possiblity is that one of the valves has an atmospheric leak, which is the only way that metered air could escape. By atmospheric leak, I mean a leak out of the BOV that does not follow normal airflow through one of the two ports. The situation does seem very strange.

-Paul
Old Apr 26, 2007, 06:45 AM
  #25  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Posts: 3,043
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
the oem style bov's take uicp pressure & apply it to the bottom side of the diaphram. that is 1 reason why you loose boost reponse in part throttle conditons compared to the type s, as you have all this pressure within the uicp/under the bov diaphram & no boost pressure on top it the diaphram holding the bov closed, since your boost source for the top of the bov comes from he plenum, which has no boost.

this pressure source is there to provide a type of damping effect when the bov opens & closes, it should produce less car bucking/jerking when the bov is doing its thing during part throttle.

this is also why there is so much more seat pressure applied to the oem bov valve when you try to push it open with your finger.

i have no idea for the strange afr's....i havent given it any thought.
Old Apr 26, 2007, 06:46 AM
  #26  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by PVD04
What intake pipe are you running (MAF to turbo)? If not stock, does the recirc port direct air towards the MAF or towards the turbo (the stock pipe directs air towards the turbo)? With a pipe that directs air towards the turbo or perpendicular to flow, it is even more likely that TTP's explanation is possible. Another possiblity is that one of the valves has an atmospheric leak, which is the only way that metered air could escape. By atmospheric leak, I mean a leak out of the BOV that does not follow normal airflow through one of the two ports. The situation does seem very strange.

-Paul
The intake pipe is part aluminum part rubber. 3 inch al with return tube welded at 90 degrees. So air is not directed at mass. The return is closer to turbo side but does disrupt mass air reading during return event. Evident by stumbling idle. The al piece can be flipped to make the return pipe closer to mass. It was like this at first and I flipped it to try and reduce amount of disturbance. It didn't make any difference where the return tube was.

I am tempted to remove my hood and try rubber glove trick to see whats going on. I would have to put a check valve inline to keep vac from sucking valve open. Then I could see how much leakage there is during boost.
Old Apr 26, 2007, 01:09 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
trinydex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by cfdfireman1
94AWDcoupe,
I don't think you have the concept yet.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ad.php?t=24611
worst thread ever, stop talkin' now
Old Apr 26, 2007, 01:12 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
trinydex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
There are three things that hold valve closed. First is the spring pressure. Second is boost on top of spring pressure. Boost at manifold should be the same as boost in the IC pipe.
why would this ever be true? the manifold pressure should always be less than the pipe pressure. otherwise you'll never have any flow going to the manifold.

there is a vaccum at the manifold... this will decrease the pressure observed.

the ic pipe is hwere you're supposed to source your bov pressure source, it is explicitly stated in the dejon tools leak stop kit instructions which should hold universal due to the things i've stated above.
Old Apr 26, 2007, 01:16 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
trinydex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
So there is suction at 150psi and suction at 5psi. Anyone want to guess if there is suction at 25psi? I am quite certain the answer is yes.

So while that whole 16 page thread about BOV testing was nice, he completely left out the real world testing. real world testing includes suction on the valve.
if there is suction on the valve why would you ever need a sprung gate to keep the bov shut? there's presssure and the valves do blow open
Old Apr 26, 2007, 01:17 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
trinydex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by cfdfireman1
The suction you mention is called the venturi effect. You didn’t mention the other thing that holds the valve closed and that is the differential between the surface area on top and bottom of the valve. Five PSI is equal to ten PSI if the surface area is doubled. Example 1 PSI on top of a thumbtack equals 100 PSI on the bottom.
dude... 5 psi is 5 psi no matter what...

5 psi on 1 square inch is FIVE POUNDS. 5 psi on 2 inches squared is TEN.


Quick Reply: BOV swap has me confused.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:42 AM.