the buschur does not allow an undertray (which is what i cannot accept)... is this design alil sleeker?

 

This current model does not have the provission to mount the undertray to the crossmember but the undertray will still work and will not sag. The production model might incorporate the mounting points

This will only allow for a solid motor mount any other mount will not work.

These will be available shortly and projected Retail should be about $250.00

Eric

 

Do you plan to make one in the future that will not have a solid motor mount?

Is the weight savings exactly 7lbs or is it 6 something?

Thanks

 

Nice piece as usual... quick question that's a bit specific, do you know if this will work with a Beatrush underpanel?

 

Being that it is a solid mount, would this cause any undue stress on a daily driver?

 

You're kidding right?

 

wow.... it blows the buschur one away....

 

can you ad the toe hook ?

 

Too bad it's not legal for SCCA SoloII STU class. Too mucho metal on the motor mount.

 

Weight loss is always great but what about the stiffness in this area? Will this be acceptable for cars that turn as well as go straight if so Im in, I was looking at a solid or stiffer motor mount anyway.

 

Any upates?

 

As was stated We run this piece on our time attack car. Stiffness is not sacrificed on bit. If anything it increases it due to the solid mounted front engine mount

These are close to being done with assembly and powder coating we are looking at two weeks.

Eric

 

Excellent, I'll be waiting, thanks!!!!

 

Looks really good nice job!

 

solid mount FTL.......

seems like a dedicated racecar piece.


how long has this been on the racecar? seems like the likelyhood of stress fractures would be greatly increased