New Pulstar Plugs replacing spark plugs
ATTENTION EVOM MEMEBERS DO NOT i REPEAT DO NOT USE PULSTAR PLUGS im at work right now but once i get home ill tell you all about it with pictures.. its costing me a NEW HEAD yup a new head because of my ignorance and not keeping it OEM. and YES I HAD THE CORRECT size of plugs 1.04"
ATTENTION EVOM MEMEBERS DO NOT i REPEAT DO NOT USE PULSTAR PLUGS im at work right now but once i get home ill tell you all about it with pictures.. its costing me a NEW HEAD yup a new head because of my ignorance and not keeping it OEM. and YES I HAD THE CORRECT size of plugs 1.04"
^^funny how you have these yet you told me to use USE OEM?!?!? on the thread i posted awhile ago because i had the short plugs thats kind of being a hypocrit isnt it?!?! ( is that the right word) but besides the point ill give ya guys the review later today
Last edited by Evo9"Miss Rose"; Feb 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM.
^^i got them before i saw the ad and before the D-sport review mag came out but from my experience
just because it looks sick doesnt mean anything, i too thought it was a good choice since they did a review BUT i WAS SOO WRONG about that
but as a right now PULSTAR=
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...94#post5268994 made own thread to talk about this later today
?
tia
Looks like several other threads on these plugs missed the part about VIII and IX and the different reach??
Interesting findings:
Taken from EFI-101
++++++++++++++
My first test in the CO-2 chamber (eight plug) showed an increase in photon emission with the Pulstar vs the NGK sparkplug.
My guess is that the energy is released in a shorter time, which is what they state.
This would be similar to increasing the spark advance, this could result in a power increase.
The pressure inside the chamber was increased to 300 PSI using 100 PSI steps. The Pulstar started to NOT produce an even spark,
then as the pressure was increased to 400 PSI NO spark. The NTK's continued to spark evenly. The pressure was reduced to 100 PSI,
the Pulstar would NOT produce an even spark, very little firing if any.
What was found :
The Pulstar plug was damaged by high voltage required to fire into a chamber (cylinder) when the enviroment would be similar to a high compression or "boosted" engine.
I spoke to Lou, the inventor, he agreed, then stated that there was a problem with the construction of the insulator material.
He stated that he had a new design and would send me the new design Pulstars.
Taken from EFI-101
++++++++++++++
My first test in the CO-2 chamber (eight plug) showed an increase in photon emission with the Pulstar vs the NGK sparkplug.
My guess is that the energy is released in a shorter time, which is what they state.
This would be similar to increasing the spark advance, this could result in a power increase.
The pressure inside the chamber was increased to 300 PSI using 100 PSI steps. The Pulstar started to NOT produce an even spark,
then as the pressure was increased to 400 PSI NO spark. The NTK's continued to spark evenly. The pressure was reduced to 100 PSI,
the Pulstar would NOT produce an even spark, very little firing if any.
What was found :
The Pulstar plug was damaged by high voltage required to fire into a chamber (cylinder) when the enviroment would be similar to a high compression or "boosted" engine.
I spoke to Lou, the inventor, he agreed, then stated that there was a problem with the construction of the insulator material.
He stated that he had a new design and would send me the new design Pulstars.
Interesting findings:
Taken from EFI-101
++++++++++++++
My first test in the CO-2 chamber (eight plug) showed an increase in photon emission with the Pulstar vs the NGK sparkplug.
My guess is that the energy is released in a shorter time, which is what they state.
This would be similar to increasing the spark advance, this could result in a power increase.
The pressure inside the chamber was increased to 300 PSI using 100 PSI steps. The Pulstar started to NOT produce an even spark,
then as the pressure was increased to 400 PSI NO spark. The NTK's continued to spark evenly. The pressure was reduced to 100 PSI,
the Pulstar would NOT produce an even spark, very little firing if any.
What was found :
The Pulstar plug was damaged by high voltage required to fire into a chamber (cylinder) when the enviroment would be similar to a high compression or "boosted" engine.
I spoke to Lou, the inventor, he agreed, then stated that there was a problem with the construction of the insulator material.
He stated that he had a new design and would send me the new design Pulstars.
Taken from EFI-101
++++++++++++++
My first test in the CO-2 chamber (eight plug) showed an increase in photon emission with the Pulstar vs the NGK sparkplug.
My guess is that the energy is released in a shorter time, which is what they state.
This would be similar to increasing the spark advance, this could result in a power increase.
The pressure inside the chamber was increased to 300 PSI using 100 PSI steps. The Pulstar started to NOT produce an even spark,
then as the pressure was increased to 400 PSI NO spark. The NTK's continued to spark evenly. The pressure was reduced to 100 PSI,
the Pulstar would NOT produce an even spark, very little firing if any.
What was found :
The Pulstar plug was damaged by high voltage required to fire into a chamber (cylinder) when the enviroment would be similar to a high compression or "boosted" engine.
I spoke to Lou, the inventor, he agreed, then stated that there was a problem with the construction of the insulator material.
He stated that he had a new design and would send me the new design Pulstars.
Interesting findings:
Taken from EFI-101
++++++++++++++
My first test in the CO-2 chamber (eight plug) showed an increase in photon emission with the Pulstar vs the NGK sparkplug.
My guess is that the energy is released in a shorter time, which is what they state.
This would be similar to increasing the spark advance, this could result in a power increase.
The pressure inside the chamber was increased to 300 PSI using 100 PSI steps. The Pulstar started to NOT produce an even spark,
then as the pressure was increased to 400 PSI NO spark. The NTK's continued to spark evenly. The pressure was reduced to 100 PSI,
the Pulstar would NOT produce an even spark, very little firing if any.
What was found :
The Pulstar plug was damaged by high voltage required to fire into a chamber (cylinder) when the enviroment would be similar to a high compression or "boosted" engine.
I spoke to Lou, the inventor, he agreed, then stated that there was a problem with the construction of the insulator material.
He stated that he had a new design and would send me the new design Pulstars.
Taken from EFI-101
++++++++++++++
My first test in the CO-2 chamber (eight plug) showed an increase in photon emission with the Pulstar vs the NGK sparkplug.
My guess is that the energy is released in a shorter time, which is what they state.
This would be similar to increasing the spark advance, this could result in a power increase.
The pressure inside the chamber was increased to 300 PSI using 100 PSI steps. The Pulstar started to NOT produce an even spark,
then as the pressure was increased to 400 PSI NO spark. The NTK's continued to spark evenly. The pressure was reduced to 100 PSI,
the Pulstar would NOT produce an even spark, very little firing if any.
What was found :
The Pulstar plug was damaged by high voltage required to fire into a chamber (cylinder) when the enviroment would be similar to a high compression or "boosted" engine.
I spoke to Lou, the inventor, he agreed, then stated that there was a problem with the construction of the insulator material.
He stated that he had a new design and would send me the new design Pulstars.



