Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Just Got My Manifold...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #31  
designmanfx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FLorida
Originally posted by value
Here is the front shot turbo is HKS GT3037S. HP over 500
gt30 IS NICE... ME LIKE, BUT NOT THE ONE IM GOING WITH
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #32  
QuantumEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
I thought I might add a few things.
1. Don't get stuck on the FP30; it is a GT30 reengineered to fit on a DSM and it costs more. You'll need a manifold either way so make it fit a straight GT30 and save a bit of money. You can buy those from FP as well with the same setup I am sure.
2. The HKS kit comes in two flavors. GT2835 and GT3037. The 2835 kit accepts T25 flanged turbos. The GT3037 accepts T3 flanged turbos. It would be a waste to put an old-tech turbo onto something like that. The HKS stuff is mismatched a bit compared to straight GT turbos for a bigger compressor side or faster spool; depending on how you look at it.
3. The HKS kits are setup kits. You cannot get just the manifold. They cost around $5k+ new.
4. The RRE manifold will not fit due to space constraints with the DP and possibly WG. It is designed for DSM.
5. It's better to mount the WG on the collected area. HKS knows their stuff.
6. Breakage is from poor build/design, not because it's stainless.

I've built kits to bolt GT turbos to cars before. Namely WRX and working on EVO now.

Mark
www.Quantum-Racing.com
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #33  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (185)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
HKS offers one for the stock turbo as well..the one shown is for the GT series, and is flanged for an external.

One one from Roadrace is the turbonetics maniold....not a bad unit, but won't fit an Evo 4-8 head
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #34  
MrMeaner's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ
Sorry to go OT, but Quantum am I reading correctly? You have an 04' Evo?

I thought all U.S. Evos were all 03'.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 10:29 AM
  #35  
QuantumEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH

According to the VIN code it is an 04 model. <shrug>

Mark
www.Quantum-Racing.com
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2003 | 12:42 PM
  #36  
rogue's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: DC/VA/MD & NJ/NY
Originally posted by QuantumEVO

5. It's better to mount the WG on the collected area. HKS knows their stuff.
Actually, in no way am I trying to be a smart (you know). The optimal placement of a wastegate in on the actual exhaust side of the turbo compressor.

I wish i could scan this picture of what i mean, I will see if i can find one later. If companies actually made these we could have even flow to the turbocharger and excellent boost creep supression.

On an related to the actual thread idea: Are you using an HKS GT-RS turbo, or the new Ballistic series.

daimon
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2003 | 01:46 PM
  #37  
QuantumEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
The exhaust side of the compressor? Those are the two sides.
Ideally, you want to bypass exhaust gasses before it ever gets into the turbine housing. You TH can be far more aerodynamic that way.
I've used Garrett GT turbos, not HKS's modified stuff. They do a pretty good job of making the match a little better but both have their pros and cons.

Mark
www.Quantum-Racing.com
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2003 | 06:39 PM
  #38  
rogue's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: DC/VA/MD & NJ/NY
Here is a bad pic. But I think you will understand better what I mean. The wastegate is on the turbine housing and the gasses are routed from the to its own external pipe. It could be routed back into the original exhaust at around 18" downstream with a smooth transition fron 2 pipes into one.

I got this information from the "Maximum Boost" by corky bell. It is an excellent book worth looking into.

any way both of these ways of bleeding or holding boost are excellent. Integral wastegates interfere with the exhaust gasses exiting the turbo, which is less than Ideal and promotes poor wastegate respones at higher boost levels.


:: The manifold shown in this tread is of good design, the only thing I would do is make sure that the inside of the manifold is smooth and not rough from the weld. Maybe have it "Extrude Hone"(d), then coat it. =)
Attached Images  

Last edited by rogue; Jul 11, 2003 at 07:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 06:07 AM
  #39  
designmanfx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FLorida
Originally posted by rogue
:: The manifold shown in this tread is of good design, the only thing I would do is make sure that the inside of the manifold is smooth and not rough from the weld. Maybe have it "Extrude Hone"(d), then coat it. =)
Actually, thats why I haven't installed it yet.
I'm having it extrude/hone/polished. THen im going to thermal coat it, should be ready soon :-) I'll keep you guys informed
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 06:46 AM
  #40  
QuantumEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
Hmm I don't know how good of an idea it is to extrude hone the newer tech turbo housings, but I guess we'll see. Jet Hot, etc. is certainly handy, though. Especially given how close all that stuff is on the EVO.
The wastegate you show there is mounted on the turbine housing, not the compressor housing. Just a terminology thing. Yes, that one doesn't look too bad. It becomes pretty tought, though to actually mount the WG on the TH like that when you get into close quarters and big WG setups. That looks like a fairly ideal design as well, though. I was mainly trying to convince ppl not to go with a manifold that was mounting the WG on one runner.

Mark
www.Quantum-Racing.com
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 07:42 AM
  #41  
rogue's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: DC/VA/MD & NJ/NY
Mark, i updated the terminology.

Actually I think he is just extrude honing the exhaust manifold. You are right though on newer tech turbo's it would not be worth it to extrude hone unless you are making big (600+ hp).

daimon
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 07:56 AM
  #42  
QuantumEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
Well I think it may not only be not useful but rather negative in effect. The newer stuff seals a lot better/closer. Honing it out may make it a little worse.

Mark
www.Quantum-Racing.com
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 07:58 AM
  #43  
QuantumEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
OTOH, the older stuff may actually spool faster when Extrude Honed.

Mark
www.Quantum-Racing.com
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 11:25 PM
  #44  
thor's hammer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
What's the diameter of the exhaust from the cylinder head? Would be interested in a picture of the head with the exhaust manifold removed, rather than take the manifold off my Evo.
The size of the tubes should match the size of the head.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 PM.